Technical Aspects by Equal-Circumstances for Delimitation between Thailand – Cambodia above Latitude 11 N.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Thailand and Cambodia have claimed continental shelf unilaterally in Gulf of Thailand resulting overlapping claim area. Negotiation between Thailand and Cambodia is contiguous. Presently, the still agreement is the Memorandum of Understanding between the Royal Government of Cambodia and the Royal Thai Government regarding the Area of their Overlapping Maritime Claims to the Continental Shelf, named as Overlapping Claims Area (OCA), done on 18 June B.E. 2554 (MOU 2544). This research aims at finding solution for maritime delimitation between Thailand and Cambodia based on MOU 2544 that the delimitation is above latitude 11 north. The research begins with case study from International Court of Justice (ICJ) and International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS). Geographic Information System (GIS) is the tool for analysis the input data which are topographic information such as general direction of the coast, relevant coastline for finding the relevant area. The overlapping area to be delimited is from the relevant area. The overlapping area stemmed from the relevant area is to lower the different aspects for defining overlapping independently. The maritime area from the research is equitable because the input data, topographic information, is subjective. This research strengthens the equitable solution for delimitation in UNCLOS 1982. The research is from author’s analysis based on geographic circumstances. The other circumstances such as historic title and socialites are none for analysis. The results is the author’s opinion only.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author has the sole responsibility for the material published in RTNA Journal of Science and Technology, which the editorial board may not agree on that material.
RTNA Journal of Science and Technology owns the copyright of the text, the illustration, or other material published in the journal. No parts or the whole of the material published may be disseminated or used in any form without first obtaining written permission from the academy.
References
United Nations, Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, Office of Legal Affairs. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. United Nations; 2001 [cited 4 Jul 2023]. Available from: https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
International Court of Justice. Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine). Judgment; 2009 Feb 3.
International Court of Justice. Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia). Judgment; 2012 Nov 19.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal. Judgment; 2012 Mar 14. Hamburg: International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.
International Hydrographic Organization. A MANUAL ON TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA – 1982 (TALOS). Edition 6.0.0 [Internet]. International Hydrographic Organization; 2020 [cited 25 Dec 2023]. Available from: https://iho.int/uploads/user/pubs/cb/c-51/C_51_Ed600_052020.pdf
International Court of Justice. Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras) [Internet]. International Court of Justice; [date unknown] [cited 15 Nov 2023]. Available from: https://www.icj-cij.org/case/120
กำหนดไหล่ทวีปของประเทศไทยด้านอ่าวไทย. ราชกิจจานุเบกษา 28 พ.ค. 2516; 90(60):1-4.
Memorandum of Understanding between the Royal Government of Cambodia and the Royal Thai Government regarding the Area of their Overlapping Maritime Claims to the Continental Shelf [Internet]. 2001 Jun 18 [cited 4 Jul 2023]. Available from: https://cwcicambodia.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/mou-2001-between-cambodia-thailand.pdf