Guidelines for Coastal Provinces Delimitation in Sovereignty of Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Thailand has claimed maritime zones starting from coastal line to the sea orderly. There are historic water, sea province for internal the Gulf of Thai, straight baselines, the width of territorial sea, the width of contiguous zone, continental shelf and exclusive economic zone (EEZ). These maritime zones can be recognized by sovereignty and sovereign right. Sovereignties are internal water and territorial sea while sovereign rights are contiguous zone, continental shelf and exclusive economic zone. Internal water is from straight baseline toward the mainland, the territorial sea is from baseline toward the sea not exceeding 12 nautical miles. Law enforcement in internal water and territorial sea is as same as law enforcement on the mainland of the coastal States. Presently, only provinces around the historic water have been designated to have own sea area. The reason for designating the sea provinces is to be manageable. Lacking of sea province for other coastal provinces causes the unfulfilled law enforcement in the sovereignty sea area such as the government officer not sure about the maritime zone in which the suspects breach the law. The most important circumstance is the method to delineate sea province different from the method to demark land demarcation. Land demarcation practically is defined by river channel or valley which cannot be used in the sea. For sea province delimitation guideline, the method will be from case studies from judgement. Already sea area will be reserved, but the lines between sea provinces will be extended to territorial sea. The objective for the delimitation line will be equitable solution as definition in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS 1982). The sea provinces will not only ensure the law enforcement in Thai Water but also can be single base map for other purposes such as search & rescue and fishery.
Article Details
The author has the sole responsibility for the material published in RTNA Journal of Science and Technology, which the editorial board may not agree on that material.
RTNA Journal of Science and Technology owns the copyright of the text, the illustration, or other material published in the journal. No parts or the whole of the material published may be disseminated or used in any form without first obtaining written permission from the academy.
References
กรมสนธิสัญญาและกฎหมาย กระทรวงการต่างประเทศ, อนุสัญญาสหประชาชาติว่าด้วยกฎหมายทะเล ค.ศ.1982. กรุงเทพฯ
วิรงรอง ทิมดี, สมาน ได้รายรัมย์. แนวทางการขยายเขตพื้นที่ที่รับผิดชอบของคณะกรรมการประมงประจำจังหวัดในเขตทะเลชายฝั่งระยะ 12 ไมล์ทะเล. เอกสารวิชาการฉบับที่ 7/2560. ราชการบริหารส่วนกลาง กรมประมง. กรุงเทพฯ
International Court of Justice (ICJ). (Judgment of 20 February 1969). North Sea Continental Shelf Cases, Federal Republic of Germany; Denmark; Netherlands. Hague.
International Court of Justice (ICJ). (Judgment of 3 February 2009). Maritime Delimitation in Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine). Hague.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS). (Judgment of 14 March 2012). Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal. Hamburg.
International Court of Justice (ICJ). (Judgment of 27 January 2014). Case concerning maritime dispute (Peru v. Chile). Hague.
International Court of Justice (ICJ). (Judgment of 13 December 2007). Territorial and maritime dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia). Hague.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS). (Judgment of 23 September 2017). Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Cote D’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean. Hamburg.
สมาน ได้รายรัมย์, (2557). The Equi-Area/Ratio The new method for maritime delimitation. United Nations, New York & National Oceanography Centre, Southampton.