Compost production from areca palm leaf sheath residues using a non-turning composting method: A case study of the Ban Tha Di Mee community enterprise in Loei province

Authors

  • Kanda Pumsin Environmental Science, Science and Technology Faculty, Loei Rajabhat University, Loei, 42000, Thailand
  • Sirirat Jangkon Environmental Science, Science and Technology Faculty, Loei Rajabhat University, Loei, 42000, Thailand
  • Narumol Sota Agriculture, Science and Technology Faculty, Loei Rajabhat University, Loei, 42000, Thailand
  • Phasita Toonsiri Agronomy and Horticulture, Agriculture Faculty, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani, 34190, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55674/cs.v19i1.268248

Keywords:

Compost, Areca palm leaf sheath residues, Non-turning composting method, Plant nutrients

Abstract

 

This study aimed to evaluate the physicochemical properties of compost produced from areca palm (Areca catechu L.) leaf sheath residues using a non-turning composting method with different agricultural residues. The study was conducted at the Ban Tha Di Mee Community Enterprise in Loei Province. Areca palm leaf sheath residues from plate production were used as the main raw material and combined with sugarcane leaves, rubber tree leaves, or rice straw, together with cow manure at a ratio of 4:1:1. The experiment was arranged in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with three treatments and three replicates (n = 3).
T1 consisted of areca palm leaf sheaths, sugarcane leaves, and cow manure; T2 consisted of areca palm leaf sheaths, rubber tree leaves, and cow manure; and T3 consisted of areca palm leaf sheaths, rice straw, and cow manure. Composting was conducted for 60 days using the Maejo Engineering Maejo 1 non-turning composting method. Data were analyzed using
one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a significance level of 0.05. All treatments produced compost with a dark color, earthy odor, and crumbly texture. The pH ranged from 6.23 to 6.72, and electrical conductivity (EC) ranged from 0.14 to 0.29 dS/m. Significant differences among treatments were found in pH, EC, organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), and total potassium (TK) (p < 0.05), whereas total phosphorus (TP) did not differ significantly (p = 0.143). OM, TN, and TP (P2O5) ranged from 10.56–13.48%, 0.38–0.48%, and 0.053–0.093%, respectively, below the cited Department of Agriculture criteria.
In contrast, TK (K₂O) ranged from 1.30–1.66%, exceeding the cited criterion of ≥0.5%.
The non-turning method is practical for community-level residue management, but further improvement of OM, TN, and TP is needed to meet organic fertilizer criteria.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

submission_268248_37832_coverImage_en_US.jpg

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Production of Organic Fertilizer Using the Maejo Engineering No-Turning Composting Maejo 1
  • Organic Fertilizer Standards of the Department of Agriculture
  • Compost Quality

References

Chen, J., Li, C., Ristovski, Z., Milic, A., Gu, Y., Islam, M. S., Wang, S., Hao, J., Zhang, H., He, C., Guo, H., Fu, H., Miljevic, B., Morawska, L., Thai, P. K., Lam, Y. F., Pereira, G., Ding, A., Huang, X., & Dumka, U. C. (2017). A review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China. Science of the Total Environment, 579, 1000–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025

Mehmood, K., Bao, Y., Bibi, S., Dahlawi, S. M., Yaseen, M., Abrar, M. M., Srivastava, P., Fahad, S., & Faraj, T. K. (2022). Contributions of open biomass burning and crop straw burning to air quality: Current research paradigm and future outlooks. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 852492. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.852492

Li, B., Xu, Z., Liu, B., Zhang, Z., Qiu, W., & Wang, W. (2024). Development of a finer-resolution multi-year emission inventory for open biomass burning in Heilongjiang Province, China. Scientific Reports, 14, 28147. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81092-9

Ryals, R., Hartman, M., Parton, W., DeLonge, M., & Silver, W. (2015). Long-term climate change mitigation potential with organic matter management on grasslands. Ecological Applications, 25(2), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-2126.1

Waqas, M., Hashim, S., Humphries, U., Ahmad, S., Noor, R., Shoaib, M., Naseem, A., Hlaing, P. T., & Lin, H. A. (2023). Composting processes for agricultural waste management: A comprehensive review. Processes, 11(3), 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030731

Coulibaly, T. P., Du, J., & Diakité, D. (2021). Sustainable agricultural practices adoption. Agriculture, 67(4), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.2478/agri-2021-0015

Diatta, A. A., Kanfany, G., Camara, B., Bassene, C., Manga, A. G. B., Seleiman, M., Mbow, C., & Schillaci, C. (2024). Compost as an alternative to inorganic fertilizers in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) production. Legume Science, 6, e247. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.247

Lhaj, M. O., Moussadek, R., Mouhir, L., Sanad, H., Manhou, K., Halima, O. I., Yachou, H., Zouahri, A., & Alaoui, M. M. (2025). Application of compost as an organic amendment for enhancing soil quality and sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) growth: Agronomic and ecotoxicological evaluation. Agronomy, 15(5), 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051045

Hayat, M., Sáez-Sandino, T., Wang, J., Li, J., Zhou, G., & Singh, B. (2026). Compost-based organic amendments and synthetic fertilisers enhance soil health and crop yield worldwide. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, 5(2), e70157. https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.70157

Finore, I., Feola, A., Russo, L., Cattaneo, A., Di Donato, P., Nicolaus, B., Poli, A., & Romano, I. (2023). Thermophilic bacteria and their thermozymes in composting processes: A review. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 10, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00381-z

Kaufman, A., & Watanasak, S. (2011). Farmers and fertilizers: A socio-ecological exploration of the alternative agriculture movement in Northeastern Thailand. Environment and Natural Resources Journal, 9(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14456/ennrj.2011.10

Popradit, A., Wiangnon, J., Jitrabiab, P., & Pakvilai, N. (2022). Organic fertilizer application using leaf waste according to Maejo engineering method 1. Thai Environmental Engineering Journal, 36(3), 47–54.

Department of Agriculture. (2026, March 6). Notification of the Department of Agriculture on organic fertilizer standards B.E. 2557 (2014). https://www.doa.go.th/ard/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/FEDOA11.pdf

Land Development Department. (2026, March 6). Organic fertilizer standards (compost and high-quality organic fertilizer). http://www1.ldd.go.th/ldd/Fertilizer/Organic_Fertilizer.pdf

AOAC International. (2019). Official method 955.04: Nitrogen (total) in fertilizers: Kjeldahl method. In G. W. Latimer, Jr. (Ed), Official methods of analysis of AOAC International.

Department of Agriculture. (2026, March 6). The criteria for organic fertilizer according to the notification of the Department of Agriculture B.E. 2555 (2012). https://www.doa.go.th/ard/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/FEDOA5.pdf

Guo, R., Li, G., Jiang, T., Schuchardt, F., Chen, T., Zhao, Y., & Shen, Y. (2012). Effect of aeration rate, C/N ratio and moisture content on the stability and maturity of compost. Bioresource Technology, 112, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.099

Makan, A., Assobhei, O., & Mountadar, M. (2013). Effect of initial moisture content on the in-vessel composting under air pressure of organic fraction of municipal solid waste in Morocco. Iranian journal of environmental health science & engineering, 10(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-3

Gurusamy, N. N., Puffer, N., De Jongh, C., Rodriguez Gil, C., & Aspray, T. J. (2021). Effect of initial moisture content and sample storage duration on compost stability using the ORG0020 dynamic respiration test. Waste Management, 125, 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.048

Huang, D., Gao, L., Cheng, M., Yan, M., Zhang, G., Chen, S., Du, L., Wang, G., Li, R., Tao, J., Zhou, W., & Yin, L. (2022). Carbon and N conservation during composting: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 840, 156355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156355

Ye, P., Fang, L., Song, D., Zhang, M., Li, R., Awasthi, M. K., Zhang, Z., Xiao, R., & Chen, X. (2023). Insights into carbon loss reduction during aerobic composting of organic solid waste: A meta-analysis and comprehensive literature review. Science of the Total Environment, 862, 160787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160787

Chaichan, W., Chujam, N., & Chuaymoo, A. (2017). Feasibility of compost production from coffee ground mixed with decanter cake in foam box. RMUTK Research Journal, 11(2), 53–61.

Loss, A., Couto, R. da R., Brunetto, G., Veiga, M. da, Toselli, M., & Baldi, E. (2019). Animal manure as fertilizer: Changes in soil attributes, productivity and food composition. International Journal of Research - GRANTHAALAYAH, 7(9), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i9.2019.615

Rayne, N., & Aula, L. (2020). Livestock manure and the impacts on soil health: A review. Soil Systems, 4(4), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4040064

Wilton, M. (2026, April 20). The basics and acids of composting. Actium Resources. https://actiumresources.com/2023/03/the-basics-and-acids-of-composting

Oueld Lhaj, M., Moussadek, R., Mouhir, L., Mdarhri Alaoui, M., Sanad, H., Iben Halima, O., & Zouahri, A. (2024). Assessing the evolution of stability and maturity in co-composting sheep manure with green waste using physico-chemical and biological properties and statistical analyses: A case study of Botanique Garden in Rabat, Morocco. Agronomy, 14(7), 1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071573

Carmo, D. L. do, Lima, L. B. de, & Silva, C. A. (2016). Soil fertility and electrical conductivity affected by organic waste rates and nutrient inputs. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 40, e0150152. https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20150152

Wattanapornchai, S., Pakwilai, N., Jeentham, S., & Phochanjan, P. (2025). Production of organic fertilizer from herbal medicine residues and agricultural waste materials. Journal of Environmental Education Medical and Health, 10(1), 189–198.

Ruayruen, W., Khammanee, N., & Nopparat, P. (2022). Production and properties study of compost from waste materials in agroforestry systems. Science, Technology, and Social Sciences Procedia, 2022(4), 1–7.

Thammayod, A., Roschat, W., Leelatam, T., Phewphong, S., Maneerat, B., Leelatam, N., Thangthong, A., Moonsin, P., & Promarak, V. (2024). Development of high-quality organic fertilizer from biomass waste and the application of biochar in local areas of Sakon Nakhon Province, Northeastern Thailand. Trends in Sciences, 22(2), 9105. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2025.9105

Pongthornpruek, S. (2019). Participatory action research for composting biomass waste in agroforestry systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 15(2), 78–87.

Buachum, S., & Towattana, P. (2026, April 20). Compost and growing media production from aquatic weeds and agricultural waste materials in the Pak Phanang Basin, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. In A. Sooksomchitra (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th National and International Research Conference (pp. 546–556). Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University. http://journalgrad.ssru.ac.th/index.php/5-01/article/view/319/282

Downloads

Published

2026-10-05

How to Cite

Pumsin, K., Jangkon, S., Sota, N., & Toonsiri , P. (2026). Compost production from areca palm leaf sheath residues using a non-turning composting method: A case study of the Ban Tha Di Mee community enterprise in Loei province. Creative Science, 19(1), 268248. https://doi.org/10.55674/cs.v19i1.268248

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2027): Creative Science (January - March) (Upcoming Issue)

Section

Research Article

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2026 : Kanda Pumsin, Sirirat Jangkon, Narumol Sota, Phasita Toonsiri

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.