The Locating Suitable Anchoring Sites in Sattahip Bay, Thailand by Using GIS and Logistic Regression Model.

Main Article Content

สัณหณัฐ อิสมาแอล

บทคัดย่อ

     Sattahip Bay is one of the important maritime regions in Thailand since 3 main harbors (Laem Thian Naval Base, Chuk Samet Naval Base, and Sattahip Commercial Port) located in this bay. Consequently, tons of ships port-in and port-out in this area including some ships also anchor in the bay as well. However, selecting a wrong anchoring location led to unexpected incidents such as getting ground on the rock, ship collision, etc. In order to mitigate those issues, the aim of this project is to use Geographic Information System (GIS) and Logistic Regression Model to generate suitable an anchoring site model in Sattahip Bay with 5 main factors, which are water depth, seafloor type, current speed, the availability of communication signal, and clearance from dangerous object. The results from the model imply that the middle area of Sattahip Bay is the most suitable for anchoring since all criteria is met that are neither too deep and too shallow water depth, proper holding force from sand and clay, low current speed, average accessibility of communication signal, and no dangerous object. This model is useful to serve as a cross check tool for navigators to mitigate man errors in anchoring. 


 

Article Details

บท
บทความวิจัย

References

Hydrographic Department of Royal Thai Navy. Thailand 1: 40000 Nautical Chart Number 115 Ao Sattahip. Bangkok: Hydrographic Department of Royal Thai Navy; 2006.

House, D. Ship Handling. London: Routledge; 2007.

Ministry of Defence (Navy). Admiralty Manual of Seamanship. [place unknown]: [publisher unknown]; 1995.

Royal Thai Navy. Seamanship. Bangkok: Royal Thai Navy; 2013.

Parker BB, Huff LC. Modern Under-Keel Clearance Management. International Hydrographic Review [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2023 Jan 16]; LXXV (2):145-6. Available from:https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/ihr/article/view/22959

Galor W. Optimization of under-keel clearance during ship's maneuvering in port water areas. 2007 Jan; 3:2681-8.

Svetak J. Ship Squat. Promet - Traffic –Traffico [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2023 Jan 23];13(4):247-51. Available from: https://www.scribd.com/doc/254552086/ship-squat

Schatz Energy Research Center. California North Coast Offshore Wind Studies: Anchoring Technology Risk Assessment. Humboldt. CA: Schatz Energy Research Center; 2020.

Intertanko. Anchoring Guidelines: A Risk-Based Approach [Internet]. [place unknown]: [publisher unknown]; 2019 [cited 2023 Jan 30]. Available from:https://www.maritimecyprus.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2019Intertanko_Anchoring_guidelines_a_risk-based-approach.pdf

Grabe J, Wu L. Coupled-Eulerian-Lagrangian simulation of the penetration and braking behavior of ship anchors in clay. Geotechnik. 2016 Mar;39(3): n/a-n/a.

Osthoff D, Heins E, Grabe J. Impact on submarine cables due to ship anchor – soil interaction. Geotechnik. 2017 May;40(4):265-70.

Richards JA. Radio Wave Propagation: An Introduction for the Non-Specialist [Internet]. Heidelberg: Springer; 2008 [cited 2023 Feb 13]. Available from: http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/12332/1/270.pdf

Pereira JMC, Itami RM. GIS-based habitat modeling using logistic multiple regression: a study of the Mt. Graham Red Squirrel. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 1991 Jan;57(11):1475-86.

Li X, Hou Z, Lu J, Yang D, He Z, Cao Z, et al. Research on calculation model of penetration depth when anchor touches Seabed. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021 Aug;2006(1):012015.

Davis AR, Broad A, Gullett W, Reveley J, Steele C, Schofield C. Anchors away? The impacts of anchor scour by ocean-going vessels and potential response options. Mar Policy. 2016 Nov; 73:1-7.

Rasool AM, Ibrahim YE, Qureshi MU, Mahmood Z. Analysis of communication tower with

different heights subjected to wind loads using TIA-222-G and TIA-222-H standards. Journal

of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2022 Nov;22(4).