Comparison of High-Order WENO and TENO schemes for Shock Wave Capturing in Compressible-Fluid Simulation

Main Article Content

M. Parnichprapa
P. Tunkeaw
W. Rojanaratanangkule

Abstract

In this paper, the performance of high-order numerical schemes for capturing small-scale flow structures and shock waves is evaluated. The chosen schemes are a fifth-order WENO scheme of Jiang and Shu (1996) (WENO-JS), a sixth-order WENO with localized dissipative interpolation (CWENO6-CULD) of Wong and Lele (2017), and a sixth-order TENO scheme with adaptive dissipation of Fu, Hu, and Adams (2019). The results indicate that the CWENO6-CULD scheme offers reduced computational time than TENO6-A to 5%, while the TENO6-A scheme excels in capturing both small-scale flow features and shock waves with greater accuracy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Parnichprapa, M., Tunkeaw, P., & Rojanaratanangkule, W. (2025). Comparison of High-Order WENO and TENO schemes for Shock Wave Capturing in Compressible-Fluid Simulation. Journal of Research and Applications in Mechanical Engineering, 13(3), JRAME–25. retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jrame/article/view/258478
Section
RESEARCH ARTICLES

References

Pirozzoli S. Numerical methods for high-speed flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 2011;43:163–194.

Harten A, Engquist B, Osher S. Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes I. Journal of Computational Physics. 1987;71:231–303.

Liu X-D, Osher S, Chan T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. Journal of Computational Physics. 1994;115:200–212.

Jiang G-S, Shu C-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. Journal of Computational Physics. 1996;126:202–228.

Henrick AK, Aslam TD, Powers JM. Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes achieving optimal order near critical points. Journal of Computational Physics. 2005;207:542–567.

Borges R, Carmona M, Costa B, Don WS. An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics. 2008;227:3191–3211.

Hu XY, Wang Q, Adams NA. An adaptive central-upwind weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme. Journal of Computational Physics. 2010;229:8952–8965.

Wong ML, Lele SK. High-order localized dissipation weighted compact nonlinear scheme for shock-and interface-capturing in compressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics. 2017;339:179–209.

Fu L, Hu XY, Adams NA. A family of high-order targeted ENO schemes for compressible-fluid simulations. Journal of Computational Physics. 2016;305:333–359.

Fu L, Hu XY, Adams NA. Improved five-and six-point targeted essentially nonoscillatory schemes with adaptive dissipation. AIAA Journal. 2019;57(3):1143–1158.

Fu L, Hu XY, Adams NA. A targeted ENO scheme as implicit model for turbulent and genuine subgrid scales. Communications in Computational Physics. 2019;26(2):311–345.

Pirozzoli S. On the spectral properties of shock-capturing schemes. Journal of Computational Physics. 2006;219:489–497.

Yamaleev NK, Carpenter MH. A systematic methodology for constructing high-order energy stable WENO schemes. Journal of Computational Physics. 2009;228(11):4248–4272.

Domingues MO, Gomes SM, Roussel O, Schneider K. An adaptive multiresolution scheme with local time stepping for evolutionary PDEs. Journal of Computational Physics. 2008;227:3758–3780.

Sod GA. A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics. 1978;27:1–31.

Shu C, Osher WS. Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock-capturing schemes, II. Journal of Computational Physics. 1989;83:32–78.

Titarev VA, Toro EF. Finite-volume WENO schemes for three-dimensional conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics. 2004;210:238–260.

Tunkeaw J. Direct numerical simulation of compressible two-species mixing layer. Chiang Mai University; 2023.