Evaluate of correlation coefficient technique for automated stitching appendicular skeleton x-ray image
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/rmutlengj.2018.12Keywords:
stitching images, 2 dimensional correlation coefficient, window techniqueAbstract
This article presents the X-ray image stitching algorithm for appendicular skeleton diagnosis based on correlation coefficients. The X-ray images samples were obtained from phantom models. The proposed technique decreased processing time by filtering and reducing image size, in contrast to the old technique which used all pixel points for finding correlation coefficient. Moreover, the proposed method reduced processing time by creating rectangular frames around connected points to identify the image reference for finding correlation coefficient. The accuracy results of the correlation between radiography of upper limb and lower scapula were 97.60 and 98.22 percent.
References
1. ข้อมูลสถิติจำนวนผู้สูงอายุประเทศไทยประจำปี 2559. Available from: https://www.dop.go.th/th/Know /1/51 [Accessed 20th November 2017].
2. Fan Y, Yan H, Zhen ZD, Ang Y. Improvement of automated image stitching system for dr x-ray images. Comput Biol Med. 2016;71: 108-14.
3. Patil VP, Gohaatre UB. Performance comparison of image stitching methods under different illumination conditions. Int J Eng Technol Sci Res. 2017;4(9):249-59.
4. Rankov V, Locke RJ, Edens RJ, Barber PR, Vojnovic B. An algorithm for image stitching and blending. In: Conchello JA, Cogswell CJ, Wilson T, editors.Three-dimensional and multidimen-sional microscopy: Image acquisition and pro-cessing 12; 2005 Mar, p. 190-99.
5. Paudel K. Stitching of x-ray image. thesis. Uppsala university; 2012.
6. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt JR EM, Boone JM. X-ray production x-ray tubes and x-ray generators. In: Mitchell CW, editor. The essential physics of medical imaging. China: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins:2012: p. 171-206.
7. Sreegadha GS. Image Interpolation Based On Multi Scale Gradients. In: procedia. comput. sci. j. 2016; 85:713-24.
8. Fadnavis S. Image interpolation techniques in digital image processing: an overview. Int J Eng Res App. 2014;4(10):70-3.
9. Bracewell RB. Two-dimensional convolution. In: Oppenheim AV, editor. Two-dimensional imag-ing. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall;1995. p. 179-87.
2. Fan Y, Yan H, Zhen ZD, Ang Y. Improvement of automated image stitching system for dr x-ray images. Comput Biol Med. 2016;71: 108-14.
3. Patil VP, Gohaatre UB. Performance comparison of image stitching methods under different illumination conditions. Int J Eng Technol Sci Res. 2017;4(9):249-59.
4. Rankov V, Locke RJ, Edens RJ, Barber PR, Vojnovic B. An algorithm for image stitching and blending. In: Conchello JA, Cogswell CJ, Wilson T, editors.Three-dimensional and multidimen-sional microscopy: Image acquisition and pro-cessing 12; 2005 Mar, p. 190-99.
5. Paudel K. Stitching of x-ray image. thesis. Uppsala university; 2012.
6. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt JR EM, Boone JM. X-ray production x-ray tubes and x-ray generators. In: Mitchell CW, editor. The essential physics of medical imaging. China: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins:2012: p. 171-206.
7. Sreegadha GS. Image Interpolation Based On Multi Scale Gradients. In: procedia. comput. sci. j. 2016; 85:713-24.
8. Fadnavis S. Image interpolation techniques in digital image processing: an overview. Int J Eng Res App. 2014;4(10):70-3.
9. Bracewell RB. Two-dimensional convolution. In: Oppenheim AV, editor. Two-dimensional imag-ing. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall;1995. p. 179-87.
Downloads
Published
2019-02-21
How to Cite
โรจนอัมพวัน ถ., พฤกษ์ภัทรานนต์ พ., ตัณฑนุช ส., อินา น., & ชีวกุล จ. (2019). Evaluate of correlation coefficient technique for automated stitching appendicular skeleton x-ray image. RMUTL Engineering Journal, 3(2), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.14456/rmutlengj.2018.12
Issue
Section
Research Article
For Author
