การจำแนกสารอินทรีย์ระเหยจากหน้ากากอนามัยแบบใช้ครั้งเดียว

Authors

  • ทับทิม ชาติสุวรรณ์ อาจารย์, คณะวิศวกรรมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลอีสาน วิทยาเขตขอนแก่น 150 ถนนศรีจันทร์ อำเภอเมือง จังหวัดขอนแก่น 40000
  • มณีรัตน์ องค์วรรณดี อาจารย์, วิทยาลัยพัฒนามหานคร มหาวิทยาลัยนวมินทราธิราช กรุงเทพฯ อาคารนวมินทร์ 1 198 ซอยสามเสน 13 ถนนสามเสน แขวงวชิรพยาบาล เขตดุสิต กรุงเทพฯ 10300

Keywords:

volatile organic compounds, face masks, SPME-GCMS technique

Abstract

Nowadays hygiene face masks, personal protective equipment, are widely used for protection against airborne transmission diseases and particulate matter. However, hygiene face masks made of polymer can emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which is harmful to wearers. This study aimed to measure VOCs quantitatively and qualitatively from four brands of single-use medical face masks and four brands of non-medical face masks. Each face mask was tested by cutting into a 1 x 5 cm² piece, placing it into a 20 mL glass sample vial, and sealing it tightly. The sample was then shaken at 30 oC for 24 hours. In-vial VOCs were sampled using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber for 3 minutes, then analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Results show alkanes were major emitted compounds from all tested face masks due to their production of using polypropylene fibers. Additionally, ketone, aromatic, and alcohol compounds were detected, which are presumed to be additives in the manufacturing process. The total VOC emission rates were 0.03-0.14 µg/m²h-1. The statistical analysis using the linear regression method indicated that the number of days and type of face mask had no statistically significant effect (p-value > 0.05) on the quantity of TVOC emitted from the face masks. A simple method of air-drying face masks for 3 days was found to reduce TVOC by two to five times. Furthermore, VOC emission standards for single-use face masks are thought to assist protecting consumers.

References

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. The situation of COVID-19 [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 May 30]. Available from: https://ddc.moph.go.th/uploads/ckeditor2//files/Alert_covid_04.26.2568.pdf. (In thai)

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. The situation of influenza [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 May 30]. Available from: https://ddc.moph.go.th/doe/pagecontent.php?page=607&dept=doe. (In thai)

BBC News. PM2.5: More than 10 million people in Thailand will be sick from “air pollution” in 2023 [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 May 30]. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/thai/articles/c723508nx22o. (In thai)

Unicef Thailand. Air pollution accounted for 8.1 million deaths globally in 2021, becoming the second leading risk factor for death, including for children under five years [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2024 Oct30]. Available from: https://shorturl.asia/3ki60. (In thai)

World Health Organization‎. Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance, 5 June 2020 [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2024 Oct 30]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/045f4cc8-f9a2-4792-b3a6-bb2e22b42ea4/content.

Grandwang NonWoven. Non-woven production process [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2024 Oct 2]. Available from: https://www.grandwangnonwoven.com/content/26707/Non-woven production process. (In thai)

Techasatian L, Lebsing S, Uppala R, Thaowandee W, Chaiyarit J, Supakunpinyo C, et al. The effects of the face mask on the skin underneath: A prospective survey during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 2020;11. doi: 10.1177/2150132720966167.

Park S, Han J, Yeon YM, Kang NY, Kim E, Suh BF. Effects of one year of daily face mask wearing on the skin during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Skin Research and Technology 2022;28(5):729-39. doi: 10.1111/srt.13193.

Taleb R, Jad R, Salem R, Lababidi N, Awassa N, Atchan H, et al. The effect of frequently wearing face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic on the development of acne in adults: a crosssectional descriptive study. BAU Journal - Health and Wellbeing 2022;4(2):4. doi: 10.54729/MXTG6413.

Scheid JL, Lupien SP, Ford GS, West SL. Commentary: physiological and psychological impact of face mask usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(18):6655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186655.

Park S, Han J, Yeon YM, Kang NY, Kim E. Effect of face mask on skin characteristics changes during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Skin Research and Technology 2020;27(4): 554-9.

Park S, Han J, Yeon YM, Kang NY, Kim E, SUH BF. Long-term effects of face masks on skin characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Skin Research and Technology. 2022;28(1):153-61. doi: 10.1111/srt.13107.

Szepietowski JC, Matusiak Ł, Szepietowska M, Krajewski P, Białynicki‐Birula R. Face mask-induced itch: a self-questionnaire study of 2,315 responders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Dermato-Venereologica. 2020;100(10):1-5. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3536.

Plastics Institute of Thailand. Medical face mask products [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jan 2]. Available from: https://rmuti.me/gkGBxAQ6Q. (In thai)

ASTM International. ASTM F2100-21. Standard specification for performance of materials used in medical face masks. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2021

European Committee for Standardization. EN 14683:2019+AC:2019. Medical face masks - requirements and test methods [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Jan 30]. Available from: http://www.shanghaijifa.com/uploadfile/file/20200318/1584515148111951.pdf.

Chatsuvan T, Homwuttiwong S, Morris J, Ongwandee M. Volatile organic compounds from unexpected sources: fabric softener-initiated emissions. EnvironmentAsia 2022; 15(1):131-41. doi: 10.14456/ea.2022.12.

Vas G, Vékey K. Solid-phase microextraction: a powerful sample preparation tool prior to mass spectrometric analysis. Journal of Mass Spectrometry 2004;39(3):233-54. doi: 10.1002/jms.606.

Goss KU, Schwarzenbach RP. Linear free energy relationships used to evaluate equilibrium partitioning of organic compounds. Environmental Science & Technology 2001;35(1):1-9. doi: 10.1021/es000996d.

Cabanes A, Valdés F, Fullana A. A review on VOCs from recycled plastics. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 2020;25:e00179. doi: 10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00179.

National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem compound summary for CID 31261, Acetylacetone [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Feb 3]. Available from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/%20%09acetylacetone.

National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem compound summary for CID 1140, Toluene [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Feb 3]. Available from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Toluene.

Ren Y, Guan X, Peng Y, Gong A, Xie H, Chen S, et al. Characterization of VOC emissions and health risk assessment in the plastic manufacturing industry. Journal of Environmental Management 2024;357:120730. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120730.

Mckee RH, Adenuga MD, Carrillo JC. Characterization of the toxicological hazards of hydrocarbon solvents. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 2015;45(4):273-365. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2015.1016216.

Maskell D, da Silva CF, Mower K, Rana C, Dengel A, Ball RJ, et al. Properties of bio-based insulation materials and their potential impact on indoor air quality. Academic Journal of Civil Engineering 2015;33(2):156-63. doi: 10.26168/icbbm2015.24.

de Kort JMA, Gauvin F, Loomans MGLC, Brouwers HJH. Emission rates of bio-based building materials, a method description for qualifying and quantifying VOC emissions. Science of the Total Environment 2023;905:167158. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167158.

Saengphet T, Yimprayoon C. A comparative study of TVOC and HCHO emissions from various multilayer built-in furniture components based on ISO 16000-9:2006 emission test chamber methods. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning 2022;21(1):205. doi: 10.54028/NJ202221205.

Fan C, Huang Y, Lin J, Li J. Microplastic constituent identification from admixtures by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy: the use of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and nylon (NY) as the model constituents. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2021;23:101798. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101798.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย (Research Article)