ผลกระทบของแถบเส้นชะลอความเร็วรูปแบบต่าง ๆ ต่อการตื่นรู้ของผู้ขับขี่สำหรับประยุกต์ใช้บริเวณจุดตัดทางรถไฟ

Authors

  • อาทิตยา นิ่มอนงค์ อาจารย์, คณะวิศวกรรมศาสตร์และสถาปัตยกรรมศาสตร์, มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลตะวันออก วิทยาเขตอุเทนถวาย, 225 ถ.พญาไท แขวงปทุมวัน เขตปทุมวัน กทม. 10330
  • พรณรงค์ เลื่อนเพ็ชร อาจารย์, คณะวิศวกรรมศาสตร์, มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลพระนคร, 1381 ถนนประชาราษฎร์ 1 แขวงวงศ์สว่าง เขตบางซื่อ กทม. 10800

Keywords:

Rumble Strip, Noise Level, Vibration Level, Appropriate Design

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the noise and vibration level in the vehicle cockpit, while moving through the designed rumble strip. The motorcycle, passenger car, pick-up truck and heavy truck are selected as test vehicles. In order to assess the impact of driver awareness, it is considered the difference in noise and vibrations level within the cockpit while moving through the rumble strip. The results concluded that the noise level inside a cockpit, while the vehicle is moving through a rumble strip, increases according to the speed of the vehicle. On the other hand, the vibration level inside a cockpit tends to decrease, corresponding to the movement velocity. Taking into account the appropriate design for the rumble strip, each vehicle type is inconsistent. We found that the most appropriate rumble strip design for motorcycles is 10 cm wide and 0.3 cm thick, with 25 cm spacing between the stripes. Passenger cars are also 10 cm wide but 0.6 cm thick, and the spacing between the stripes remains 25 cm. The appropriate rumble strip design for pick-up trucks is the same as for passenger cars, but the spacing between the stripes is 50 cm. In the case of heavy trucks, the design is higher than others, with a width of 20 cm, a thickness of 0.6 cm, and a spacing of 50 cm between the stripes. The outcome enhances the advancement of knowledge in order to improve design requirements for ensuring safety at railway crossings, mitigating the likelihood of accidents, and optimizing the efficiency of the railway system.

References

Roywiratana S. Teaching documents for the seminar on the railway network of Thailand and the region. Bangkok, Thailand: Infrastructure engineering and management, Kasetsart university; 2017. (In Thai)

Operation control division, State railway of Thailand. Statistics on train accidents for fiscal years 2011-2021. Bangkok, Thailand: State railway of Thailand; 2022. (In Thai)

Department of rail transport. Master plan for improving future railway intersections. Study project to reduce accidents at road and railway intersections. Bangkok, Thailand: Department of rail transport; 2022. (In Thai)

Vadeby A, Anund A. Effectiveness and acceptability of milled rumble strips on rural two-lane roads in Sweden. European transport research review 2017;9;29. doi: 10.1007/s12544-017-0244-x.

Hossain A, Sun X, Rahman A, Khanal S. Safety evaluation of centerline rumble strips on rural two-lane undivided highways: Application of intervention time series analysis. IATSS Research 2023;47(2):286-98. doi: 10.1016/j.iatssr.2023.05.001.

Satthayamalee S. Research to determine the standard for using rumble strips to reduce traffic speed. Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand: Suranaree university of technology; 2010. (In Thai)

Walton S, Meyer E. The effect of rumble strip configuration on sound and vibration levels. ITE Journal 2002;72(12):28-32.

Montella A, Aria M, D’Ambrosio A, Galante F, Mauriello F, Pernetti M. Simulator evaluation of drivers’ speed, deceleration and lateral position at rural intersections in relation to different perceptual cues. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2011;43(6):2072-84. doi: 10.1016/j.aap. 2011.05.030.

Karkle DE, Rys MJ, Russell ER. Centerline rumble strips usage in the united states. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum 2011;50(1): 101-17. doi: 10.5399/osu/jtrf.50.1.2676.

Miles JD, Finley MD. Factors that influence the effectiveness of rumble strip design. Transportation Research Record 2007;2030(1):1-9. doi: 10.3141/2030-01.

Wilson Ihrig & Associates, Inc. Central area guideway ground borne noise and vibration report and northern area Berryessa extension. VTA Capital expressway light rail project; 2008.

Houix O, Bonnot S, Vienne F, Vericel B, Pardo LF, Misdariis N, Susini P. Perceptual influence of the vibratory component on the audio component of alarms produced by rumble strips, by measuring reaction times. Proceedings of the Acoustics 2012 Nantes Conference; 2012 Apr 23-27; Nantes, France. p.1083-8.

Pimentel RL, de Melo RA, Rolim IA. Estimation of increases in noise levels due to installation of transverse rumble strips on urban roads. Applied Acoustics. 2014;76:453-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.09.014.

Kasess CH, Maly T, Majdak P, Waubke H. Effects of rumble strip parameters on acoustics, vibration, and perception. Acta Acustica 2021;5:54. doi: 10.1051/aacus/2021047.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. 7th ed. Washington, D.C., USA: AASHTO; 2018.

Spring GS. Rumble strips in Missouri. Rolla, USA: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Missouri-Rolla; 2003.

ATS Consulting. Noise and vibration study: AC transit. Oakland, California, USA: ATS Consulting; 2005.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-25

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย (Research Article)