Optimization of Swine Farm Wastewater Treatment Using Mixed Microalgae: Statistical Modeling and Performance Evaluation via Response Surface Methodology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/rmutlengj.2026.3Keywords:
Mixed microalgae, Swine farm wastewater, COD removal, Phosphorus removal, Response Surface Methodology (RSM)Abstract
Swine farm wastewater contains high concentrations of organic matter and nutrients, requiring treatment approaches that are both effective and economically feasible. This study evaluated the performance of mixed indigenous microalgae for the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total phosphorus (TP) from swine farm wastewater and optimized the effects of initial pH and algal concentration using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with a Central Composite Design (CCD). Thirteen experimental runs were conducted under outdoor conditions to reflect field applicability. COD and TP removal efficiencies ranged from 74.30–83.85% and 75.17–83.58%, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that pH significantly influenced both COD and TP removal, whereas algal concentration exerted a stronger effect on COD removal but a comparatively weak influence on TP, in agreement with ANOVA results. The quadratic model demonstrated strong predictive performance for COD (R² = 0.9879; predicted R² = 0.9245), while the TP model displayed limited predictive capability, suggesting that additional unmeasured factors may govern phosphorus reduction. Numerical optimization identified pH 7.69 and algal concentration (A600) 2.072 as the optimal conditions, yielding predicted removals of 78.21% COD and 82.00% TP. Although TP levels approached regulatory thresholds, COD remained above discharge limits, highlighting the need for a polishing step prior to release. Overall, the results demonstrate that mixed indigenous microalgae offer a robust, low-cost treatment strategy for swine wastewater and provide optimized operational conditions to support practical implementation.
References
Li X, Wu S, Yang C, Zeng G. Microalgal and duckweed based constructed wetlands for swine wastewater treatment: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2020;318:123858.
Wang Z, Hu G, Hong Y. Strong alliance of microalgae and bacteria: the state-of-the-art review and future prospects of utilizing microalgae-bacteria consortia for comprehensive treatment of swine wastewater. Curr Pollut Rep. 2024;10(4):744-764.
Calatrava V, Gonzalez-Ballester D, Dubini A. Microalgae for bioremediation: advances, challenges, and public perception on genetic engineering. BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1): 1261.
Ethiraj S, Samuel MS, Iyyappan SM. A comprehensive review of the challenges and opportunities in microalgae-based wastewater treatment for eliminating organic, inorganic, and emerging pollutants. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2024;60:103316.
Dey I, Mondal A, Pal R. Algae-based systems for removal of emerging pollutant from sewage sludge. In: Dey S, Shah MP, editors. Biotechnological removal of emerging pollutants from wastewater systems [Internet]. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2025 p.109-133. Available from: https://link. springer.com/10.1007/978-981-96-3945-8_5.(Accessed 24 Oct 2025).
Rawat I, Ranjith Kumar R, Mutanda T, Bux F. Dual role of microalgae: phycoremediation of domestic wastewater and biomass production for sustainable biofuels production. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(1):3411-3424.
Ferreira A, Figueiredo D, Cardeiras R, Nabais R, Ferreira F, Ribeiro B, et al. Exploring different pretreatment methodologies for allowing microalgae growth in undiluted piggery wastewater. Agronomy. 2022;12 (3):1-17.
Mohsenpour SF, Hennige S, Willoughby N, Adeloye A, Gutierrez T. Integrating microalgae into wastewater treatment: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2021;752:142168.
Liu XY, Hong Y, Zhao GP, Zhang HK, Zhai QY, Wang Q. Microalgae-based swine wastewater treatment: strain screening, conditions optimization, physiological activity and biomass potential. Sci Total Environ. 2022;807:151008.
He Z, Zhou X, Qu L, Jin W, Li X, Liu H, et al. Integrating electrochemical pretreatment with microalgae treatment for nitrogen and
phosphorus removal and resource recovery from swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2024;414:131559.
Guo G, Cao W, Sun S, Zhao Y, Hu C. Nutrient removal and biogas upgrading by integrating fungal-microalgal cultivation
with anaerobically digested swine wastewater treatment. J Appl Phycol. 2017;29(6):2857-2866.
Reza A, Chen L, Mao X. Response surface methodology for process optimization in livestock wastewater treatment: a review.
Heliyon [Internet]. 2024;10(9):e30326. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.heliyon. 2024. e30326(Accessed 24 Oct 2025.
American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 23rd ed. Washington
(DC): American Public Health Association; 2017.
Cheng DL, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Kumar SM. Microalgae biomass from swine wastewater and its
conversion to bioenergy. Bioresour Technol. 2019; 275: 109-122: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.biortech.2018.12.019.
Beltrán-Rocha JC, Guajardo-Barbosa C,
Barceló-Quintal ID, Reyna-Martínez G,
Fariz-Salinas E, Ramírez-Castillo A, et al.
Effect of natural increase of pH and
microalgae cyclical re-cultivation on
biomass production and polishing of
municipal secondary effluent. Desalin Water
Treat. 2024;317:100103.
Shi S, Zhang Y, Lin S, Zhang M, Zou W,
Zhou J, et al. Deciphering the promotion and
inhibition of bicarbonate fertilization on
microalgal activity and nutrient uptake from
wastewater. J Environ Manage. 2025;
:124810.
Abadi FS, Shokrkar H, Nedaei L. Efficiency
of mixed algae in nitrate and phosphate
removal from wastewater: optimization of
environmental conditions and kinetic
analysis. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin
Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ bbb.70064. [Accessed 11 Dec 2025].
Mao Y, Xiong R, Gao X, Jiang L, Peng Y,
Xue Y. Analysis of the status and
improvement of microalgal phosphorus
removal from municipal wastewater.
Processes. 2021;9(9):1486.
Bezerra SS, Fontana L, Arantes CC, de Jesus
TA. Phosphorus removal from wastewater
by microalgal cultivation in
photobioreactors: a systematic literature
review and multivariate analysis. Environ
Monit Assess. 2025; 197 (11):1182.
Popa MD, Simionov IA, Petrea SM,
Georgescu PL, Ifrim GA, Iticescu C.
Efficiency of microalgae employment in
nutrient removal (nitrogen and phosphorus)
from municipal wastewater. Water.
;17(2):260.
Abdoli S, Asgari Lajayer B, Dehghanian Z,
Bagheri N, Vafaei AH, Chamani M, et al. A
review of the efficiency of phosphorus
removal and recovery from wastewater by
physicochemical and biological processes:
challenges and opportunities. Water.
;16(17):2507.
Wang J, Lei Z, Tian C, Liu S, Wang Q,
Shimizu K, et al. Ionic response of algal-
bacterial granular sludge system during
biological phosphorus removal from
wastewater. Chemosphere. 2021; 264:
Suthakaran V. Phosphorus removal using
novel carbon adsorbents derived from waste
algae: an industrial ecology approach to
mitigate algal blooms [dissertation]. Florida
(US): Florida Atlantic University; 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



