Optimization of Swine Farm Wastewater Treatment Using Mixed Microalgae: Statistical Modeling and Performance Evaluation via Response Surface Methodology

Authors

  • Chanida Phaophanplaek Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University
  • Ketmani Rachpanya Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University
  • Supatpong Mattaraj Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University
  • Wipada Dechapanya Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University
  • Tiammanee Rattanaweerapan Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University
  • Sompop Sanongraj Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University
  • Karnika Ratanapongleka Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/rmutlengj.2026.3

Keywords:

Mixed microalgae, Swine farm wastewater, COD removal, Phosphorus removal, Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

Abstract

Swine farm wastewater contains high concentrations of organic matter and nutrients, requiring treatment approaches that are both effective and economically feasible. This study evaluated the performance of mixed indigenous microalgae for the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total phosphorus (TP) from swine farm wastewater and optimized the effects of initial pH and algal concentration using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with a Central Composite Design (CCD). Thirteen experimental runs were conducted under outdoor conditions to reflect field applicability. COD and TP removal efficiencies ranged from 74.30–83.85% and 75.17–83.58%, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that pH significantly influenced both COD and TP removal, whereas algal concentration exerted a stronger effect on COD removal but a comparatively weak influence on TP, in agreement with ANOVA results. The quadratic model demonstrated strong predictive performance for COD (R² = 0.9879; predicted R² = 0.9245), while the TP model displayed limited predictive capability, suggesting that additional unmeasured factors may govern phosphorus reduction. Numerical optimization identified pH 7.69 and algal concentration (A600) 2.072 as the optimal conditions, yielding predicted removals of 78.21% COD and 82.00% TP. Although TP levels approached regulatory thresholds, COD remained above discharge limits, highlighting the need for a polishing step prior to release. Overall, the results demonstrate that mixed indigenous microalgae offer a robust, low-cost treatment strategy for swine wastewater and provide optimized operational conditions to support practical implementation.

References

Li X, Wu S, Yang C, Zeng G. Microalgal and duckweed based constructed wetlands for swine wastewater treatment: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2020;318:123858.

Wang Z, Hu G, Hong Y. Strong alliance of microalgae and bacteria: the state-of-the-art review and future prospects of utilizing microalgae-bacteria consortia for comprehensive treatment of swine wastewater. Curr Pollut Rep. 2024;10(4):744-764.

Calatrava V, Gonzalez-Ballester D, Dubini A. Microalgae for bioremediation: advances, challenges, and public perception on genetic engineering. BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1): 1261.

Ethiraj S, Samuel MS, Iyyappan SM. A comprehensive review of the challenges and opportunities in microalgae-based wastewater treatment for eliminating organic, inorganic, and emerging pollutants. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2024;60:103316.

Dey I, Mondal A, Pal R. Algae-based systems for removal of emerging pollutant from sewage sludge. In: Dey S, Shah MP, editors. Biotechnological removal of emerging pollutants from wastewater systems [Internet]. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2025 p.109-133. Available from: https://link. springer.com/10.1007/978-981-96-3945-8_5.(Accessed 24 Oct 2025).

Rawat I, Ranjith Kumar R, Mutanda T, Bux F. Dual role of microalgae: phycoremediation of domestic wastewater and biomass production for sustainable biofuels production. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(1):3411-3424.

Ferreira A, Figueiredo D, Cardeiras R, Nabais R, Ferreira F, Ribeiro B, et al. Exploring different pretreatment methodologies for allowing microalgae growth in undiluted piggery wastewater. Agronomy. 2022;12 (3):1-17.

Mohsenpour SF, Hennige S, Willoughby N, Adeloye A, Gutierrez T. Integrating microalgae into wastewater treatment: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2021;752:142168.

Liu XY, Hong Y, Zhao GP, Zhang HK, Zhai QY, Wang Q. Microalgae-based swine wastewater treatment: strain screening, conditions optimization, physiological activity and biomass potential. Sci Total Environ. 2022;807:151008.

He Z, Zhou X, Qu L, Jin W, Li X, Liu H, et al. Integrating electrochemical pretreatment with microalgae treatment for nitrogen and

phosphorus removal and resource recovery from swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2024;414:131559.

Guo G, Cao W, Sun S, Zhao Y, Hu C. Nutrient removal and biogas upgrading by integrating fungal-microalgal cultivation

with anaerobically digested swine wastewater treatment. J Appl Phycol. 2017;29(6):2857-2866.

Reza A, Chen L, Mao X. Response surface methodology for process optimization in livestock wastewater treatment: a review.

Heliyon [Internet]. 2024;10(9):e30326. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.heliyon. 2024. e30326(Accessed 24 Oct 2025.

American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 23rd ed. Washington

(DC): American Public Health Association; 2017.

Cheng DL, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Kumar SM. Microalgae biomass from swine wastewater and its

conversion to bioenergy. Bioresour Technol. 2019; 275: 109-122: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.biortech.2018.12.019.

Beltrán-Rocha JC, Guajardo-Barbosa C,

Barceló-Quintal ID, Reyna-Martínez G,

Fariz-Salinas E, Ramírez-Castillo A, et al.

Effect of natural increase of pH and

microalgae cyclical re-cultivation on

biomass production and polishing of

municipal secondary effluent. Desalin Water

Treat. 2024;317:100103.

Shi S, Zhang Y, Lin S, Zhang M, Zou W,

Zhou J, et al. Deciphering the promotion and

inhibition of bicarbonate fertilization on

microalgal activity and nutrient uptake from

wastewater. J Environ Manage. 2025;

:124810.

Abadi FS, Shokrkar H, Nedaei L. Efficiency

of mixed algae in nitrate and phosphate

removal from wastewater: optimization of

environmental conditions and kinetic

analysis. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin

Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ bbb.70064. [Accessed 11 Dec 2025].

Mao Y, Xiong R, Gao X, Jiang L, Peng Y,

Xue Y. Analysis of the status and

improvement of microalgal phosphorus

removal from municipal wastewater.

Processes. 2021;9(9):1486.

Bezerra SS, Fontana L, Arantes CC, de Jesus

TA. Phosphorus removal from wastewater

by microalgal cultivation in

photobioreactors: a systematic literature

review and multivariate analysis. Environ

Monit Assess. 2025; 197 (11):1182.

Popa MD, Simionov IA, Petrea SM,

Georgescu PL, Ifrim GA, Iticescu C.

Efficiency of microalgae employment in

nutrient removal (nitrogen and phosphorus)

from municipal wastewater. Water.

;17(2):260.

Abdoli S, Asgari Lajayer B, Dehghanian Z,

Bagheri N, Vafaei AH, Chamani M, et al. A

review of the efficiency of phosphorus

removal and recovery from wastewater by

physicochemical and biological processes:

challenges and opportunities. Water.

;16(17):2507.

Wang J, Lei Z, Tian C, Liu S, Wang Q,

Shimizu K, et al. Ionic response of algal-

bacterial granular sludge system during

biological phosphorus removal from

wastewater. Chemosphere. 2021; 264:

Suthakaran V. Phosphorus removal using

novel carbon adsorbents derived from waste

algae: an industrial ecology approach to

mitigate algal blooms [dissertation]. Florida

(US): Florida Atlantic University; 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-28

How to Cite

Phaophanplaek, C. ., Rachpanya, K. ., Mattaraj, S. ., Dechapanya, W. ., Rattanaweerapan, T. ., Sanongraj, S. ., & Ratanapongleka, K. . (2026). Optimization of Swine Farm Wastewater Treatment Using Mixed Microalgae: Statistical Modeling and Performance Evaluation via Response Surface Methodology. RMUTL Engineering Journal, 11(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.14456/rmutlengj.2026.3

Issue

Section

Research Article