Influence of Fineness Modulus Values, Polypropylene Fibers Contents, and Air Foam Contents on Dry Unit Weight and Strengths of Lightweight Geopolymer Reinforced Polypropylene Fibers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/rmutlengj.2024.14Keywords:
Lightweight concrete, geopolymer, fineness modulus, polypropylene fibersAbstract
This paper investigated the influence of fineness modulus on dry weight, compressive strength and flexural strength of lightweight geopolymer reinforced polypropylene fibers. Geopolymer fly ash was used as a cementitious material. The fineness modulus of sand was determined at 1.6, 1.45, and 1.3, polypropylene fibers contents of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3% by weight of fly ash, air foam contents (AF) of 0, 1, and 2% by weight of binder, fly ash to sand ratio was 1, the alkaline solution to binder ratio was 0.55, and the sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) to sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH) was 50:50. The results showed that the dry weight decreased with increasing polypropylene fiber contents and air foam contents. The lowest dry weight was found at a fineness modulus of 1.6, a polypropylene fiber content of 3% by weight of fly ash, and an air foam content of 2% by weight of binder. The maximum compressive strength and flexural strength were found at a fineness modulus of 1.45. The flexural strength increased by the enhancement of polypropylene fiber content due to fiber-controlling cracks and reduced crack width. The flexural strength decreased by increasing the polypropylene fiber contents up to 3% by weight of fly ash because the excess fibers induced the friction in sample. The dry weight and compressive strength of lightweight geopolymer reinforced polypropylene fibers was by the Thai Industrial Standards (TIS 2601-2013). The dry weight was between 701-1,600 kg/m3 and the compressive strength was more than 5.0 MPa (51.0 kg/cm2).
References
Masoule MS, Bahrami N, Karimzadeh M, Mohasanati B, Shoaei P, Ameri F, et al. Lightweight geopolymer concrete: A critical review on the feasibility, mixture design, durability properties, and microstructure. Ceram Int. 2022; 48(8):10347-71.
Yoosuk P, Suksiripattanapong C, Sukontasukkul P, Chindaprasirt P. Properties of polypropylene fiber reinforced cellular lightweight high calcium fly ash geopolymer mortar. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2021; 15:e00730.
Akers DJ, Gruber RD, Ramme BW, Boyle MJ, Grygar JG, Rowe SK, et al. Guide for structural lightweight-aggregate concrete. ACI 213R-03. American Concrete Institute (ACI), Michigan. 2003.
Zebua WS. The influence of PET plastic waste gradations as coarse aggregate towards compressive strength of light concrete. Procedia Eng. 2017; 171:614-9.
Chaitongrat C, Siwadamrongpong S. Recycling of melamine formaldehyde waste as fine aggregate in lightweight concrete. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol. 2018; 40(1).
Alsalman A, Assi LN, Kareem RS, Carter K, Ziehl P. Energy and CO2 emission assessments of alkali-activated concrete and Ordinary Portland Cement concrete: A comparative analysis of different grades of concrete. Cleaner Environ Syst. 2021; 3:100047.
Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, van Deventer JS. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mater Sci. 2007; 42:2917-33.
Davidovits J. Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1991; 37(8):1633-56.
Tchakouté HK, Rüscher CH, Kong S, Kamseu E, Leonelli C. Geopolymer binders from metakaolin using sodium waterglass from waste glass and rice husk ash as alternative activators: A comparative study. Constr Build Mater. 2016; 114:276-89.
Guo X, Xiong G. Resistance of fiber-reinforced fly ash-steel slag based geopolymer mortar to sulfate attack and drying-wetting cycles. Constr Build Mater. 2021; 269:121326.
ASTM International. ASTM C618-19, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2019.
Xin CL, Wang ZZ, Zhou JM, Gao B. Shaking table tests on seismic behavior of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete tunnel lining. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. 2019; 88:1-5.
Das CS, Dey T, Dandapat R, Mukharjee BB, Kumar J. Performance evaluation of polypropylene fibre reinforced recycled aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2018; 189:649-59.
ASTM International. ASTM C33-18, Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2023.
Thai Industrial Standards Institute (TISI). TIS no. 2601-2556, Cellular lightweight concrete blocks using preformed foam. TIS; 2013. Thai.
Rattanasak U. Geopolymer. Thailand Concrete Association; 2019. Thai.
Standard AS. C138: Standard Test Method for Density (Unit Weight), Yield, and Air-Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. 2013.
ASTM International. ASTM C109/109M-20, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2020.
ASTM International. ASTM C348-21, Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2021.
Bellum RR. Influence of steel and PP fibers on mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash-GGBFS based geopolymer composites. Ceram Int. 2022; 48(5):6808-18.
Wongkvanklom A, Posi P, Kasemsiri P, Sata V, Cao T, Chindaprasirt P. Strength, thermal conductivity and sound absorption of cellular lightweight high calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Eng Appl Sci Res. 2021; 48(4).
Wang Y, Zheng T, Zheng X, Liu Y, Darkwa J, Zhou G. Thermo-mechanical and moisture absorption properties of fly ash-based lightweight geopolymer concrete reinforced by polypropylene fibers. Constr Build Mater. 2020; 251:118960.
Chung SY, Abd Elrahman M, Kim JS, Han TS, Stephan D, Sikora P. Comparison of lightweight aggregate and foamed concrete with the same density level using image-based characterizations. Constr Build Mater. 2019; 211:988-99.
Ranjbar N, Talebian S, Mehrali M, Kuenzel C, Metselaar HS, Jumaat MZ. Mechanisms of interfacial bond in steel and polypropylene fiber reinforced geopolymer composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2016; 122:73-81.
Al-Mashhadani MM, Canpolat O, Aygörmez Y, Uysal M, Erdem S. Mechanical and microstructural characterization of fiber reinforced fly ash based geopolymer composites. Constr Build Mater. 2018; 167:505-13.
Suksiripattanapong C, Krosoongnern K, Thumrongvut J, Sukontasukkul P, Horpibulsuk S, Chindaprasirt P. Properties of cellular lightweight high calcium bottom ash-portland cement geopolymer mortar. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2020; 12:e00337.
Song Y, Lange D. Influence of fine inclusions on the morphology and mechanical performance of lightweight foam concrete. Cem Concr Compos. 2021; 124:104264.
Mohseni E. Assessment of Na2SiO3 to NaOH ratio impact on the performance of polypropylene fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites. Constr Build Mater. 2018; 186:904-11.
Ammari MZ, Fowler R. Grading of fine crushed stone and its effect on concrete properties used in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Civ Eng Technol. 2017; 8:259-67.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.