รูปแบบการประเมินสภาผู้นำชุมชนจัดการตนเองเพื่อชุมชนน่าอยู่

Abstract

This study had 3 significant objectives; 1)To study working condition and the methods of community leader council evaluation, 2) To develop community leader council evaluation model in terms of self-management for livable community, and 3)To try out community leader council evaluation model in terms of self-management for livable community. This research was divided in to 3 phases. The first phase was the study of working condition as well as the methods of community leader council evaluation by studying related document and research, interviewing, and meeting in order to brainstorm the ideas. The 69 key informants were the community leaders living in 14 Northern Thai provinces. The second phrase was conducted by developing evaluation model of community leader council in self-management for livable community. The Delphi method was applied in this phrase by using 17 experts. Then, the third phrase, trying out community leader council evaluation model in terms of self-management for livable community, was conducted in 2 villages by 2 groups of 20 assessors. The data were analyzed by using median and interquartile range.

          The findings revealed as follows.1)Community leader council could work according to their roles and were succeed in village management. Furthermore, the community members had appropriate behavior in terms of health care. They had also life safety and better environment. However, there was no obvious evaluation model. Therefore, the evaluation model should be developed in order to get more information relating to administration for supporting the community leader council operation. 2)The development of community leader council         in terms of self-management for livable community consisted of 9 elements; 1)The definition of evaluation, 2)The objective of evaluation, 3)The 4 aspects of evaluation consisted of community leader council management, input, and operational processes. Also, the operation outcome consisted of 16 indicators were evaluation 4)processes, 5)assessors, 6)evaluation instruments, 7)evaluation judgment, 8)evaluation results’ report, and 9)the usage of evaluation results. The experts considered the evaluation model appropriate and possible in terms of its factors (Mdn › 3.50, IQR ≤ 1.50). 3)Trying out the evaluation model of community leader council in self-management for livable community in 2 villages, the results confirmed that the evaluation results, according to each factor and indicator, were at the highest level. Besides, the assessors’ group considered the evaluation model possible. Its validity, propriety, and utility were at the highest level (x̄ = 4.70, S.D. = 0.45).