APPLICATION OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION INTERACTION (LUTI) MODEL FOR TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD): THE CASE STUDY OF CITY AND ACTIVITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE MRT PINK LINE CORRIDOR, BANGKOK METROPOLITAN REGION
Keywords:
Transit-Oriented Development (TOD), Land Use and Transportation Interaction (LUTI), TRANUS, MRT Pink Line, Floor Area Ratio, Bangkok Metropolitan RegionAbstract
Bangkok Metropolitan Region continues to face severe traffic congestion and high dependence on private vehicles, while major investment in rail transit has been promoted as a mechanism to support more sustainable urban development. This paper applies a Land Use and Transportation Interaction (LUTI) model using TRANUS to assess Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) along the MRT Pink Line corridor, focusing on two contrasting activity areas: Chaeng Watthana Government Center (CWG) and Muang Thong Thani (MTT). The study's contribution is a corridor-scale framework that translates TOD concepts into model outputs, including density, diversity, accessibility, consumer surplus, land consumption, and travel demand. The model was developed using population, employment, land use, land price, traffic network, public transport, travel behavior, and traffic count data, and was validated against survey observations in the base year. Scenario testing indicates that the MRT Pink Line, feeder services, and pedestrian improvements reduce private-car trips from 466,611 trips/day in BAU2030 to 396,799 trips/day in Scenario A and 390,175 trips/day in Scenario B, representing reductions of 15.0% and 16.4%, respectively. Walking trips increase by 43.2%-47.3%, and bus trips increase by 25.1%-59.2%, indicating improved access to public transport. However, transport infrastructure alone generates only limited land-use restructuring. When the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) policy is added in TOD target areas, residential floor area increases from 1.42 to 2.11 million square meters in MTT and from 0.19 to 0.56 million square meters in CWG. The findings show that TOD implementation requires integrated rail infrastructure, feeder systems, pedestrian facilities, mixed-use zoning, and FAR-based planning controls.
References
Iamtrakul P, Padon A, and Klaylee J. Measuring spatializing inequalities of transport accessibility and urban development patterns: focus on megacity urbanization, Thailand. Journal of Regional and City Planning 2022;33(3):345-66. doi: 10.5614/jpwk.2022.33.3.4.
Kii M, Vichiensan V, Llorca C, Moreno A, Moeckel R, Hayashi Y. Impact of decentralization and rail network extension on future traffic in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Sustainability 2021;13(23):13196. doi: 10.3390/su132313196.
Ayaragarnchanakul E, Creutzig F. Bangkok’s locked-in traffic jam: price congestion or regulate parking. Case Studies on Transport Policy 2022;10(1):365-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.12.016.
Department of Rail Transport. Mass Rapid Transit master plan in Bangkok Metropolitan Region 2 [internet]. Bangkok: Department of Rail Transport; 2024 [cited 2024 Aug 7]. Available from: https://www.otp.go.th/post/view/1657.
Ahmadzai F. Analyses and modeling of urban land use and road network interactions using spatial-based disaggregate accessibility to land use. Journal of Urban Management 2020;9(3):298-315. doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2020.06.003.
Salas-Olmedo MH, Wang Y, Alonso A. Assessing accessibility with local coefficients for the LUTI model MARS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2017;64:194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.02.004.
Zhong S, Wang S, Jiang Y, Yu B, Zhang W. Distinguishing the land use effects of road pricing based on urban form attributes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2015;74:44-58. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.009.
Furlan R, Petruccioli A, Major MD, Zaina S, Zaina S, Al Saeed M, et al. The urban regeneration of west-bay business district of Doha (State of Qatar): a transit-oriented development enhancing livability. Journal of Urban Management 2019;8(1):126-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2018.10.001.
Thomas R, Bertolini L. Defining critical success factors in TOD implementation using rough set analysis. Journal of Transport and Land Use 2017;10(1):139-54. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.2015.513.
Cervero R, Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 1997;2(3):199-219. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.
Kamruzzaman M, Shatu FM, Hine J, Turrell G. Commuting mode choice in transit oriented development: disentangling the effects of competitive neighbourhoods, travel attitudes, and self-selection. Transport Policy 2015;42:187-96. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.06.003.
Lo Feudo F. How to build an alternative to sprawl and auto-centric development model through a TOD scenario for the North-Pas-de-Calais region: lessons from an integrated transportation-land use modelling. Transportation Research Procedia 2014;4:154-77. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.013.
Vichiensan V. Integrated approach to analyze land-use transport and environment in Bangkok: case studies of railway impact and TRANUS application [internet]. 2006. [cited 2023 Feb 4] Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Integrated-Approach-to-Analyze-Land-Use-Transport-%3A- vichiensan/6077305b6fb2bd7fab1fa1a1b60dc011537275f5.
Vale DS, Viana CM, Pereira M. The extended node-place model at the local scale: evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon’s subway network. Journal of Transport Geography 2018;69:282-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.004.
Abdullah J, Mazlan MH. Characteristics of and quality of life in a transit oriented development (TOD) of Bandar Sri Permaisuri, Kuala Lumpur. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2016;234:498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.268.
Zhou J, Yang Y, Gu P, Yin L, Zhang F, Zhang F, et al. Can TODness improve expected performances of TODs? An exploration facilitated by non-traditional data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2019;74:28-47. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.008.
Renne J, Voorhees A, Bloustein E, Jenks C. Transit-oriented development: developing a strategy to measure success. Washington (DC): National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; 2005.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kasem Bundit University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
*Copyright
The article has been published in Kasem Bundit Engineering Journal (KBEJ) is the copyright of the Kasem Bundit University. Do not bring all of the messages or republished except permission from the university.
* Responsibility
If the article is published as an article that infringes the copyright or has the wrong content the author of article must be responsible.