• Pawitchaya Phuengkhoksung Master Student, The Cluster of Logistics and Rail Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University
  • Siradol Siridhara Lecturer, The Cluster of Logistics and Rail Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University
  • Somsiri Siewwuttanagul Lecturer, The Cluster of Logistics and Rail Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University


Accessibility, Geographic Information System, Light Rail Transit, Spatial Analysis, Nakhon Ratchasima


Nakhon Ratchasima Municipality has planned to develop and reform the basic infrastructure and transportation by constructing the Light Rail Transit (LRT) as an alternative public transport system. Moreover, are development to facilitate for public transport connections and the walkway safety are also included in the development plan. This present research aimed to identify catchment areas around LRT stations by referring to acceptable walking distances to LRT stations as follows - 324 meters, 400 meters, 500 meters, 648 meters, 800 meters, and 960 meters. These walking distances were used with Circular Buffer and Network Analyst Service Area techniques in order to calculate for the proportions of LRT accessibility. Employing ArcGIS 10.4 program for desktop to analyze spatial data, this research found that the areas around LRT stations in the urban area of Nakhon Ratchasima had higher accessibility level than the suburbs. The data indicated that the areas around the stations located in the urban area were suitable for pedestrian network development. In order to develop mass transit system within the area of Nakhon Ratchasima Municipality, it was suggested that feeder system in the suburbs should also be developed with less proportion of LRT accessibility than the urban area for users’ convenience. It was expected that the more accessible the LRT stations was, the more job opportunities and residential space would be available.


Download data is not yet available.


Office of Transport and traffic policy and planning. The study of traffic management and public transport development master plan in Nakhon Ratchasima urban areas 2017. (In Thai)

Calthorpe P, Poticha S. The next American metropolis ecology, community, and the American dream. New York, USA: Princeton Architectural Press; 1993.

Carlton I. Histories of transit-oriented development perspectives on the development of the TOD concept real estate and transit, urban and social movements, concept protagonist [Working paper]. California, United States; 2009.

Transit oriented development institute [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jan 20]. Available from:

TOD standard. Institute for transportation & development policy [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 20]. Available from:

Forkenbrock DJ, Benshoff S, Weisbrod GE. Assessing the social and economic effects of transportation projects. Transportation research board 2001.

Belzer D, Autler G, Espinosa J, Feigon S, Ohland G. The transit-oriented development drama and its actors. The new transit town best practices in transit-oriented development. Transportation research board 2004;43.

Bertolini L. Spatial development patterns and public transport the application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Planning practice and research 1999;14(2):199-210.

Higgins CD, Kanaroglou PS. A latent class method for classifying and evaluating the performance of station area transit-oriented development in the Toronto region. Journal of transport geography 2016;52:61-72.

Su S, Zhang H, Wang M, Weng M, Kang M. Transit-oriented development (TOD) typologies around metro station areas in urban China: a comparative analysis of five typical megacities for planning implications. Journal of transport geography 2021;90:102939.

Miller EJ. Accessibility measurement and application in transportation planning. Taylor & Francis Journals 2018;38(5):551-5.

Rodrigue JP. The geography of transport systems. 5th ed. London, UK: Routledge Taylor & Francis; 2020.

Khwanfai W. Classifying skytrain stations by building use and accessibility a case study of Sukhumvit line and Silom line. Academic journal of architecture 2019;69:33-46. (In Thai)

Geurs KT, Wee BV. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies review and research directions. Journal of transport geography 2004;12(2):127-40.

Sarkar PP, Mallikarjuna C. Effect of land use on travel behaviour a case study of Agartala city. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2013;104:533-42.

Yenisetty PT, Bahadure P. Spatial accessibility measures to educational facilities from public transit: a case of Indian cities. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. 2021;10(2):258-73.

Yenisetty PT, Bahadure P. Measuring Accessibility to Various ASFs from Public Transit using Spatial Distance Measures in Indian Cities. ISPRS International journal of geo-information 2020;9(7):446.

Meeder M. Detour factors in pedestrian networks [Master thesis spatial development and infrastructure systems]. Zurich, Switzerland: ETH Zurich; 2015.

Levinson D, El-Geneidy A. The minimum circuity frontier and the journey to work. Regional science and urban economics 2009;39(6):732-38.

Landex A, Hansen S. Examining the potential travellers in catchment areas for public transport. in ESRI user conference; 2006.

Gabriele DO, Marco M. A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments. Journal of Transport Geography 2020;82:102555.

O'Neill W, Ramsey D, Chou J. Analysis of transit service areas using geographic information systems. Transportation research record. Journal of the transportation research board 1992;1364:131-9.

Sangsila S. The pedestrain behavior of community around mass rapid transit station [independent study]. Bangkok, Thailand: Silpakorn University; 2012. (In Thai)

Sakdasak P. Development alternatives for Bang Yai District affected by the rail mass transit system [independent study]. Bangkok, Thailand: Silpakorn University; 2014. (In Thai)

Kho-oomklang S. A study of acceptable walking distance to access public transport [thesis]. Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand: Suranaree university of technology; 2017. (In Thai)

Duncan DT, Aldstadt J, Whalen J, Melly SJ. Validation of walk scores and transit scores for estimating neighborhood walkability and transit availability a small-area analysis. Geojournal 2013;78(2):407-16.

Carr LJ, Dunsiger SI, Marcus BH. Validation of walk score for estimating access to walkable amenities. British journal of sports medicine 2011;45(14):1144-8.

Transport for London. The planning for walking toolkit, tools to support the development of public realm design briefs in London; 2020.

School of remote sensing. Institute of science Suranaree university of technology; 2016.

Jirakajohnkool S. ArcGIS desktop 10.5. Bangkok, Thailand: A.P. graphic design and print; 2017.

Apparicio P, Abdelmajid M, Riva M, Shearmur R. Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues. International journal of health geographics. 2008;7(1):1-14.

Suber BA. Public transportation accessibility impacts of the Tucson modern streetcar [thesis]. California, USA: University of Southern California; 2016.

Apparicio P, Gelb J, Dubé A-S, Kingham S, Gauvin L, Robitaille É. The approaches to measuring the potential spatial access to urban health services revisited: distance types and aggregation-error issues. International journal of health geographics. 2017;16(1):1-24.






บทความวิจัย (Research Article)