ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION IN THE AI ERA: INTEGRATING KNOWLEDGE, TECHNOLOGY, AND COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT FOR FUTURE DESIGNERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55003/JIE.25201Keywords:
Architecture studies, Artificial intelligence, Design studies, Technology integration, Designer competenciesAbstract
This review aims to synthesize knowledge and trends in architectural education in the era of artificial intelligence, linking four key pillars: architectural knowledge, designer development, artificial intelligence, and digital technology integration. The review employs an integrated literature review approach, drawing from research, academic articles, books, and relevant documents both domestically and internationally. The synthesis reveals that architectural knowledge remains a crucial foundation for developing analytical, synthetic, and design decision-making skills. Studio learning should shift from focusing on project outcomes to developing critical thinking, questioning, problem-solving, and reflection. The emergence of generative AI enables learners to quickly explore, generate ideas, and develop alternatives, but this must be coupled with critical thinking, ethics, and validation. Furthermore, integrating AI with BIM, GIS, VR/AR, simulation, parametric design, and digital fabrication creates an efficient learning ecosystem that connects data, design, and evaluation. Based on this synthesis, a framework of Knowledge–Design–AI–Technology–Human is proposed to develop the competencies of future designers: architectural knowledge, creativity, systems thinking, AI literacy, digital competence, AI collaboration, sustainability, and ethical responsibility. Future architectural education should focus on creating designers who can utilize technology to expand human potential. While still maintaining the values of human-centered design.
References
Abdelsattar, A., Labib, W., Abdelalim, M., & Abowardah, E. (2026). Factors influencing teacher's perception and acceptance of generative AI in architecture education—a cross-sectional study. In Frontiers in Education. (Vol. 11,1-23). Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc. 2026.1763439.
Alamasi, R., & Asfour, O. S. (2026). Applications of generative AI in architectural design education: A systematic review and future insights. Digital, 6(1), 1-24.
Alshahrani, A., & Mostafa, A. M. (2025). Enhancing the use of artificial intelligence in architectural education–case study Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11, 1-11. https://doi.org/10. 3389/fbuil.2025.1610709.
Brozovsky, J., Labonnote, N., & Vigren, O. (2024). Digital technologies in architecture, engineering, and construction. Automation in Construction, 158, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105212.
Chaokromthong, K. (2025). A framework for enhancing BIM implementation in small construction projects: Integrating policy and architectural design strategies. Journal of Architecture, Design and Construction, 7(3), 68-76. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Jadc/article/view/279289/186258. (in Thai)
Cheewakriangkrai, M., & Sriaroon, P. (2016). The application of problem-based learning for architectural design studio. Journal of Environmental Design Innovation, 3(1), 45-67. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jed/article/view/68564/63013. (in Thai)
Danaci, H. M. (2015). Creativity and knowledge in architectural education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1309-1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.752.
Fang, X., Ng, D. T. K., Li, D. X., Tao, Y. Y., Wu, H. K., & CHU, S. K. W. (2025). GenAI-supported digital multimodal composing: facilitating EFL students’ GenAI literacy, writing engagement, motivation, and abilities. AI, Brain and Child, 1(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44436-025-00020-4.
Hettithanthri, U., & Hansen, P. (2022). Design studio practice in the context of architectural education: A narrative literature review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 2343-2364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09694-2.
Hikmet, Ş., & Ozay, N. (2026). Human–AI collaboration in architectural design education: towards a conceptual framework. Buildings, 16(6), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061097.
Kara, L. (2015). A critical look at the digital technologies in architectural education: when, where, and how?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 526-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2015.01.506.
Kitprasert, S., & Ussavadilokrit, M. (2025). Acceptance of mixed reality technology for construction project inspection. Journal of Architecture, Design and Construction, 7(2), 136-148. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Jadc/article/view/273111/185096. (in Thai)
Klaichom, S., Loomeng, A., Phuangpinyo, N., Tanjaichon, S., & Panklum, K. (2022). The development potential for teaching management in architecture design by project-based learning. Buabundit Educational Administration Journal, 22(2), 15-24. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/BUAJEAD/article/view/250603/176032. (in Thai)
International Program in Design and Architecture. (2026). About INDA. Faculty of Architecture, Chulalongkorn University. https://cuinda.com/about-us.
Lee, J. H., Ostwald, M. J., & Arasteh, S. (2026). Rethinking architectural design education and practice with AI: A cognitive–social–technical perspective. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-026-10080-z.
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16). CHI2020 Paper. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727.
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research.
Oxman, R. (2008). Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: Theory, knowledge, models and medium. Design Studies, 29(2), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.003.
Nakbure, N., & Leknoi, U. (2025). Ethical use of generative AI in research and academic writing for publication of graduate students in Bangkok based on AI literacy concept. The Journal of Research and Academics, 8(5), 319-340. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jra/article/ download/281053/191014/1266764. (in Thai)
Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., & Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119287568.
Salama, A. M. (2015). Spatial design education: New directions for pedagogy in architecture and beyond. Routledge.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Sinousy, M. A. A., Shafik, Z., & Morgan, S. R. (2026). Impact of generative AI on studio-based learning in rchitectural education: insights from a case study in Cairo University. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2025-0481.
Suksantilap, P., Thatreenaranont, N., Limyotin, A. and Galajak, P. (2026). comparison of learning achievement between traditional learning and active learning in using generative AI for design. Academic Journal Bangkokthonburi University, 15(1), pp. 120–134. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/ index.php/bkkthon/article/view/285072. (in Thai)
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Author. https://www.unesco. org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research.
Wongsom, P. (2018). The application of geo-social concept for architectural design course of area based development. Phranakhon Rajabhat Research Journal (Humanities and Social Sciences), 13(1), 201–217. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PNRU_JHSS/article/view/109877. (in Thai)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Industrial Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
"The opinions and contents including the words in papers are responsibility by the authors."
"ข้อคิดเห็น เนื้อหา รวมทั้งการใช้ภาษาในบทความถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน"
