Building Risk Assessment Model after Earthquake Using Rapid Assessment Method
Keywords:
Rapid Visual Screening, Earthquake, Seismic Risk Assessment, Collapse Probability, Structural VulnerabilityAbstract
This study proposes a seismic risk assessment model for reinforced concrete buildings following an earthquake by applying the Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) method, adapted to suit Thailand’s urban and geotechnical context. The assessment process combines standardized scoring from FEMA P-154 with field-surveyed physical indicators such as building height, number of stories, plan irregularities, presence of shear walls, and visible damage. These factors are converted into a Final RVS Score through basic scoring and adjustment factors (Score Modifiers). A logistic regression model is then employed to estimate the collapse probability based on the Final RVS Score. Field surveys were conducted on five buildings located in Bangkok, an area characterized by soft soil and moderate seismic risk. The analysis revealed a moderate negative correlation between building height and RVS score (ρ = -0.625), and a moderate positive correlation between building height and collapse probability (ρ = +0.675). One of the case study buildings, a 15-story structure with structural deterioration and irregular features, showed a high collapse probability of 73.11%. The adapted model demonstrated its effectiveness for rapid, cost-efficient screening without requiring detailed structural drawings or in-depth engineering analysis. It allows for prioritized decision-making in post-earthquake building inspections, potentially reducing unnecessary demolitions and supporting sustainable urban resilience. However, further enhancement incorporating dynamic structural behavior and digital inspection tools such as point cloud data is recommended to improve accuracy.
References
P. Chaimahawan and A. Pimanmas, “Assessment of seismic deficiency of existing reinforced concrete buildings in Bangkok,” Engineering Journal (Thailand), vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 20–24, 2007.
Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning, “Standard for seismic-resistant design of buildings (DPT 1301-50),” Ministry of Interior, Thailand, 2007.
ACI Committee 562, “Code requirements for assessment, repair, and rehabilitation of existing concrete structures and commentary,” American Concrete Institute, 2016.
Applied Technology Council, “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (ATC-40),” Redwood City, CA, USA: Applied Technology Council, 1996.
FEMA, “Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: A Handbook (FEMA P-154),” 3rd ed. Washington, DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2015.
T. Rahayu, Z. Nasution, Roesyanto, et al., “Regional zonation based on seismic vulnerability using local site effect analysis and potential damage to the City of Medan (North Sumatra, Indonesia) due to earthquake,” Geoenvironmental Disasters, vol. 9, p. 26, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40677-022-00227-0.
M. Mishra, R. Puneeth, and G. V. Ramana, “Seismic vulnerability assessment of old churches in the Twin Cities of Bhubaneswar and Cuttack using the macroelements approach,” Frontiers in Built Environment, vol. 8, Art. no. 1018922, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2022.1018922.
N. Bektaş and O. Kegyes-Brassai, “Conventional RVS methods for seismic risk assessment for estimating the current situation of existing buildings: A state-of-the-art review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 2583, 2022. doi: 10.3390/su14052583.
M. M. Kassem et al., “Assessment of seismic building vulnerability using rapid visual screening method through web-based application for Malaysia,” Buildings, vol. 11, pp. 485, 2021, doi: 10.3390/buildings11100485.
M. Kulariya, Y. Aggarwal, H. Kashyap, and S. K. Saha, “Rapid visual screening methodology for multi-hazard vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in hilly region,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10518-024-02056-y.
V. Cardinali, E. Di Rienzo, M. Tanganelli, and M. De Stefano, “Compoundbased approach for large scale seismic vulnerability assessment: Application to the Garfagnana area in Tuscany,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 23, pp. 1969–1997, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10518-025-02113-0.
F. Pomponi and A. Moncaster, “Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment – What does the evidence say?,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 181, pp. 687–700, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036.
A. Rauf, “Reducing life cycle embodied energy of residential buildings: Importance of building and material service life,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1821, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12111821.
M. A. Samuel, E. Xiong, M. Haris, B. C. Lekeufack, Y. Xie, and Y. Han, “Assessing seismic vulnerability methods for RC-frame buildings preand post-earthquake,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 23, pp. 10392, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su162310392.
H. Derakhshan, “Rapid visual screening and seismic vulnerability assessment of Queensland’s vintage unreinforced masonry buildings,” in Proc. Australian Earthquake Engineering Society Conference, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://aees.org.au/wpcontent/uploads/2023/11/32.-Hossein-Derakhshan.pdf
A. A. Raoufy, A. Kheyroddin, and H. Naderpour, “Comparative study of rapid visual screening methods in determining the seismic vulnerability of existing reinforced concrete hospital buildings,” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering, vol. 48, pp. 2263–2277, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40996-023-01288-3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Faculty of Industrial Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของคณะเทคโนโลยีอุตสาหกรรม มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว

