DEVELOPMENT OF ADVANCED THINKING SKILLS FOR LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS WHO WERE RECEIVED ACTIVE LEARNING MANAGEMENT AT MAE THA DISTRICT, LAMPANG PROVIENCE
This research aimed to 1) study advanced thinking skills of lower secondary school students who were received active learning management, 2) compare advanced thinking skills of lower secondary school students, and 3) study the mental characteristics. Target groups were 154 lower secondary school students of Mae Tha district, Lampang province, came from 51 students of Ban Mae Tha school, 54 students Pa Tan Wittaya school, and 49 students of Thong Phit Witthaya school by purposive sampling. The tools were used in this research: 1) activities for developing advanced thinking skills, 2) learning management plans of active teaching activities management, 3) behavior observation pattern about advanced thinking skills and 4) questionnaires about opinions about mental characteristics of students who participated. All tools have been checked for quality tools that given consistency index was from 0.50-1.00. Result were analyzed by using statistical analysis of quantitative data using descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation. The research found that
1) Advanced thinking skills of lower secondary school students who were received active learning management. The overall picture was 4.24 (0.66) at the highest level.
2) Comparing result of advanced thinking skills of lower secondary school students who were received active learning management. The overall picture was 4.52 (0.59) at the highest level.
3) Psychological characteristics of lower secondary school students who were received active learning management. The overall picture was 4.52 (0.59) at the highest level.
 Tisana Khaemanee. 2016. Science of teaching: knowledge for effective learning process management. 20th edition, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing.
 Kanchana Boonphak. 2014. Learning Management for Professional Teachers. Bangkok: Meanservice Dupply.
 Pimpan Dechakoop and Payao Yindeesuk. 2015. Learning Management in 21st Century. 2nd Edition. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House.
 Nattaya Latoontheerakool. 2016. Transfrom Learning into results Thailand4.0: Guidelines for the Refrom of The Education. Online Document.
 Kanchana Boonphak and Papaikan Innoi. 2018. Learning Management in Thailand 4.0 : Active Learning. Journal of Industrial Education, 17(2), 1-6.
 Fink,L.Dee. 2003. Creating significant learning experiences: an integrated approach to designing college coursese. John Wiley and Sons.
 Sukon Sinthapanon. 2018. New generation teachers and learning management to study 4.0. Bangkok: 9119 Techniques Printing Ltd. Partnership.
 Prapansiri Susaorat. 2013. Development of thinking. 5th edition. Bangkok: 9119 Technical Printing Partnership.
 Ekgapoom Jantarakantee. 2016. Science Instruction for Promoting Creative Thinking Skills. Journal of Research and Development Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University,8(1), 205-217.
 Banjong Amorncheevin. 2011. Thinking School teach to thing. Bangkok: Picture Print.
 Vicharn Panit. 2012. The way to create learning for the disciple in 21st Century. Bangkok: Sodsri-Saridwongso Foundation.
 Sukon Sinthapanon. Et al. 2009. Develop thinking skill ... Conquer teaching. 4th edition, Bangkok: Liang Chiang Printing House
 Songsaen, S. et al. 2014. The development of critical thinking for early childhood education students through mapleinstructional modle. Journal of Graduate studies ValayaLongron Rajabhat University, 8(2), 110-129.
 Sakulrattanakulchai, S. 2017.The Effect of Active Learning Method on Students’ Self-learning Capacity. Journal of Research Methodology, 30(2), 229-251.
 Chaimongkol, S.et al. 2014. Strategies for develop competency active learning of elementary teachers on highland. SWU Educational Administration Journal, 10(18), 1-12.
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Industrial Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
"The opinions and contents including the words in papers are responsibility by the authors."
"ข้อคิดเห็น เนื้อหา รวมทั้งการใช้ภาษาในบทความถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน"