Leveraging blockchain for enhancing electronic data interoperability in Thailand's port community system: Barriers and strategic enablers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Thailand's port logistics sector faces significant challenges in achieving secure and interoperable electronic data exchange across stakeholders. Although a standardized Port Community System (PCS) has been promoted, persistent issues-including fragmented digital platforms, security vulnerabilities, and institutional mistrust-impede Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) effectiveness. This study investigates the key barriers (BAR) to EDI implementation and examines how blockchain technology can be a foundational solution to overcome (OVB) them. A structured survey of 350 PCS service users and providers was administered. The data were examined using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to check the different parts of the study and Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) to look at the relationships between seven identified barrier factors (like infrastructure, legal issues, and budget) and seven strategies to overcome them (such as technology acceptance, organizational readiness, and management support). The first canonical function showed a strong relationship, with a correlation coefficient of 0.652 (p < 0.01), meaning that certain organizational actions are closely linked to reducing important barriers. This research is the first empirical study in Thailand to apply multivariate statistical modeling to blockchain-enabled PCS adoption. It contributes methodological rigor through validated measurement models, structural analysis, and practical insight for policymakers, port administrators, and logistics managers. The findings suggest blockchain can enhance transparency, trust, and secure data integration in national logistics infrastructures.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ollivier PRG, Sahu SP, Saragiotis P. Port Community Systems: Lessons from Global Experience [Internet]. Washington (DC): World Bank Group; 2024 [cited 2025 May 29]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/9c4r7zx9.
Tijan E, Jardas M, Aksentijevic S, Hadzic AP. Integrating Maritime National Single Window with Port Community System-Case study Croatia. In: Proceedings of the 31st Bled Conference; 2018 Jun 17–20; Bled, Slovenia. p. 41. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/2t46hnha.
Tijan E, Agatić A, Jović M, Aksentijević S. Maritime National Single Window-A prerequisite for sustainable seaport business. Sustainability. 2019;11(17):4570. doi: 10.3390/su11174570.
Pengman H, Kettapan K. The development of a single window integrated with transportation management in ASEAN. Veridian E-J Silpakorn Univ (Humanities Soc Sci Arts) [Internet]. 2018;11(4):879-88. Availablefrom: https://tinyurl.com/2p8v5bcc.
Thoppae C, Praneetpolgrang P. Analyzing a blockchain enabled e government Document Interchange Architecture (DIA) in Thailand. TEM J. 2021;10(3):1220-27. doi: 10.18421/TEM103-28.
Zainuddin N, Hasim NA, Rosman NA, Deraman N. A review on development challenges for an inland port at Malaysia-Thailand border. Quantum J Soc Sci Humanit. 2021;2(6):113-25. doi: 10.55197/qjssh.v2i6.114.
Iida J, Watanabe D. Focal points for the development and operation of port community System-A case study of development history in Japan. Asian Transp Stud. 2023;9:100116.
Fonseka M, Indraratna K. National Single Window: paving the way for paperless trade [Internet]. 2022 Jan 8 [cited 2025 Apr 18]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/mry7pxyv.
Pamulapati N. Single window legal framework for cross-border trade: 10 case studies [Internet]. Bangkok: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UN ESCAP); 2021 [cited 2025 May 28]. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12870/663.
Bodhibandhu S, Socatiyanuruk M. Development of Thailand's National Single Window: Current Status and Improvements. RMUTT Glob Bus Econ Rev. 2024;19(1):111-33. doi: 10.60101/rmuttgber.2024.275251.
Tsen JTT. Single Windows and Supply Chains in the Next Decade: Ten years of Single Window implementation: lessons learned for the future [Internet]. Global Trade Facilitation Conference; 2011 Oct; Geneva, Switzerland. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/hc55cwp7.
Irannezhad E. The architectural design requirements of a blockchain-based port community system. Logistics [Internet]. 2020;4(4):30. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/4/4/30.
Serra P, Fancello G, Tonelli R, Marchesi L. Application prospects of blockchain technology to support the development of interport communities. Computers. 2022;11(5):60. doi: 10.3390/computers11050060.
Jović M. Digital transformation of Croatian seaports. In: 32nd Bled eConference: Humanizing Technology for a Sustainable Society Conference proceedings/Doctoral Consortium; 2019 Jun; Bled, Slovenia. p. 1147-64.
Thumburu SKR. Integrating Blockchain Technology into EDI for Enhanced Data Security and Transparency. MZ Comput J [Internet]. 2021;2(1). Available from: https://tinyurl.com/mryfck9z.
Caldwell S. Empirical decision-making tools in the Industry 4.0 paradigm: Application to seaports [dissertation]. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University; 2024.
El Fellah K, El Azami I, El Makrani A. Original Research Article A comparative analysis of blockchain and Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) in supply chain: Identifying strengths, weaknesses, and synergies. J Auton Intell [Internet]. 2024;7(5). Available from: https://tinyurl.com/4cd97tfj.
Mulaji SM. Technological, organisational, and environmental factors affecting the adoption of blockchain-based distributed identity management in organisations [master's thesis]. Cape Town (South Africa): University of Cape Town; 2023. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38087.
Sherry A, Henson RK. Conducting and Interpreting Canonical Correlation Analysis in Personality Research: A User-Friendly Primer. J Pers Assess. 2005;84(1):37-48. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_09.
Baigy E, Pan X. Innovation adoption case study and the potential of blockchain on Trade Single Window: Identification of adoption challenges and suggestions for Pakistan Single Window [master's thesis]. Uppsala (Sweden): Uppsala University; 2022. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/mr2deskk.
Rodon J, Ramis Pujol J. Exploring the intricacies of integrating with a port community system. In: 19th Bled eConference eValues; 2006 Jun 5-7; Bled, Slovenia. p. 1-15.
UNECE. The evolution of the concept [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Apr 18]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/4h24ezx6
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC). Thailand's Logistics Report 2023 [Internet]. Bangkok: NESDC; 2023 [cited 2025 Apr 18]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/2s2ces7e.
Radulovic A. Development of human centred model of single window on the example of Port of Bar, Montenegro. Proc Inst Civ Eng Smart Infrastruct Constr. 2022;1-13. doi: 10.1680/jsmic.22.00013.
Khaslavskaya A, Roso V. Outcome driven supply chain perspective on dry ports. Sustainability. 2019;11(5):1492. doi: 10.3390/su11051492.
Peynirci E. The rise of emerging technologies: A quantitative based research on maritime single window in Turkey. Res Transp Bus Manag. 2021;100770. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100770.
Remali MZH, Harun M. Malaysia National Single Window: the enforcement Royal Malaysia Custom and Miti liabilities on trade system and logistic sector. Adv Transp Logist Res [Internet]. 2018;1:935-47. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/pya7nphj.
Torlak I, Tijan E, Aksentijević S, Oblak R. Analysis of Port Community System Introduction in Croatian Seaports-Case Study Split. Trans Marit Sci. 2020;9(2):331-41. doi: 10.7225/toms.v09.n02.015.
Onag G. Thailand confident on achieving industry 4.0 ambition [Internet]. Future IoT. 2021 Aug 2 [cited 2025 Apr 18]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/akrjezxt.
IPCSA. PCS/Port community systems-IPCSA International [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Apr 8]. Available from: https://ipcsa.international/pcs/pcs-general/.
Baran P. On distributed communications: I. Introduction to distributed communications networks [report]. Santa Monica (CA): RAND Corporation; 1964. Report No.: RM 3420 PR. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/2h358s4x.
De Filippi P, Mannan M, Reijers W. Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance. Technol Soc. 2020;62:101284. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284.
Kamble S, Gunasekaran A, Arha H. Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context. Int J Prod Res. 2019;57(7):2009-33. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1518610.
Tran TT, Do QH. Critical factors affecting the choice of logistics service provider: an empirical study in Vietnam. J Asian Financ Econ Bus. 2021;8(4):145-50. doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0145.
Malik MS. Factors affecting the organisational adoption of blockchain technology in Australia: A mixed-methods approach [dissertation]. Ballarat (Australia): Federation University; 2022. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/572923378.pdf.
Clohessy T, Acton T. Investigating the influence of organizational factors on blockchain adoption: An innovation theory perspective. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2019;119(7):1457-91. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0365.
Tian M, Deng P, Wu B. Culture and innovation in the international context: A literature overview. Innovation. 2021;34(4):426-53. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2020.1783644.
El Khatib M, Mohamad H. Digital Transformation and SMART: The Trust Factor. Int J Theory Organ Pract. 2023;3(2):137-55. doi: 10.54489/ijtop.v3i2.311.
