Information For Authors
We recommend that you review the About the Journal page for the journal's section policies, as well as the Author Guidelines. Authors need to register with the journal prior to submitting or, if already registered, can simply log in and begin the Submission Process. Please note that the journal only accepts online submissions through its website.
1. Evaluation by the Editor-in-Chief
The Editor-in-Chief will determine whether the article's topic and theme are appropriate and consistent with the Journal's stated objectives and format. Plagiarism and benefits relating to theory and business contributions will also be investigated. This process takes 1 week. If the aforementioned criteria are not met, the submitted paper may be returned to the author for preliminary revisions or rejected.
2. Evaluation by Reviewer
All submitted manuscripts must be reviewed by at least three expert reviewers in the related fields. The selected reviewers must also be from a different institution from the authors and each other. Reviewers will evaluate the quality of the submitted article for publication via the double-blinded review system; the peer review process takes 6 weeks.
The authors must make changes and improvements to the article in accordance with the reviewers’ comments. The editorial team will then evaluate the revised article unless the reviewers request to do so themselves. The language check and editing service may be provided if absolutely necessary. The process of the revision step until the final result announcement takes 6 weeks.
4. Evaluates the Reviews
The Editor-in-Chief makes decisions about article publication based on the feedback of external readers. The decision is either to accept or to reject the article for publication, including resending it to the author for further elaboration and revision. The editorial team makes the final evaluation decision. There are 4 possible outcomes that the authors can be notified of as follows:
4.1 Acceptance and Payment
4.2 Revisions Required
4.3 Resubmit for Review
1. Title in English (Gulliver 12 bold)
Author1*, Author1,2 and Author2 (Gulliver 10 bold)
1Department, Faculty, University, Full Address (Gulliver 9)
2Department, Faculty, University, Full Address (Gulliver 9)
*Corresponding author: e-mail address (Gulliver 9)
The abstract should be concise and contain only the main findings of the research. No longer than 300 words. (Gulliver 10)
Keywords: keyword1, keyword2, keyword3 (Provide a maximum of 5 keywords but not less than 3 words.)
3. INTRODUCTION (Gulliver 11)
Introduction should describe finding from pioneer work, importance of research and relevance to the current work and background information about the topic, stating the purpose of the work in the form of the research problem supported by a hypothesis or a set of questions, briefly explaining the methodological approach used to examine the research problem, highlighting the potential outcomes your study can reveal, and outlining the remaining structure of the paper. Introduction should be supported by sufficient and reasonable references.
Within this framework, using 10-point Gulliver in 2 columns for all contents in manuscript.
4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Describes the materials and tools, experimental designs in a research study. Provide sufficient details about the preparations of solutions, chemicals, data collection and the instrumentation to allow the work to be reproduced by an independent researcher. The make the numbers and the model of the instruments should be mentioned. The method for statistical analysis and the level of significance chosen shall be clearly stated. Methods that are already published should be summarized and indicated by a reference.
5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Results should be clear and concise and guide the reader through your results stressing the key results which provide the answers to the question(s) investigated. A major function of the text is to provide clarifying information. You must refer to each Table and/or Figure individually and in sequence, and clearly indicate for the reader the key results that each conveys. Key results depend on your questions, they might include obvious trends, important differences, similarities, correlations, maximums, minimums, etc.
In writing the Discussion, researchers should focus on interpreting the results in light of the research questions.
A strong Discussion section notes areas of consensus with and divergence from previous work. New authors should make particular efforts to attend to connections with existing literature. Such attunement strengthens the communicative function of the research article within the framework of the broader scientific literature.
Please submit math equations as editable text and not as images. Deﬁne all symbols the ﬁrst time they are used. All equation symbols must be defined in a clear and understandable way. Including symbols and equations in the text, the variable name and style must be consistent with those in the equations. Present simple formulae in line with normal text where possible and use the solidus (/) instead of a horizontal line for small fractional terms, e.g., X/Y.
Equations should be indented at the left margin and numbered at the right margin, equation number is enclosed with open and close round bracket (). Number consecutively any equations that have to be displayed separately from the text (if referred to explicitly in the text).
A+B = 2C (1)
Ensure that each illustration has a caption. Supply captions separately, not attached to the figure. A caption should comprise a brief title (not on the figure itself) and a description of the illustration. Keep text in the illustrations themselves to a minimum but explain all symbols and abbreviations used in caption.
Place figures as close as possible to the text they refer to and aligned center. Photos, graphs, charts or diagram must be labeled Figure (do not abbreviate) in bolded. The label and title should be in line with the figure number (e.g. Figure 1 and 2). However, it is recommended that figures are not sized less than column width unless when necessary. The text of the figure should be set in Arial with a 10-point font size.
Please submit tables as editable text and not as images. Each Table or Figure must include a brief description of the results being presented and other necessary information in a legend. Number tables consecutively in accordance with their appearance in the text and place any table notes below the table body. Be sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in them do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article. Please avoid using vertical rules and shading in table cells. Figures can be sized between column and page widths if the author chooses, however it is recommended that figures are not sized less than column width unless when necessary. When texts are typed in completely, authors can perform text formatting. Style name are summarized and tabulated below.
All table must be labeled Table (e.g. Table1 Sample), no vertical line, no boldface type except the topic.
Figure 1 Sample
(TIFF or JPEG: Color or grayscale photographs (halftones), keep to a minimum of 300 dpi. The picture should include Arial 10 font size.)
A conclusion section is not required. Although a conclusion may review the main points of the paper, do not replicate the abstract as the conclusion. A conclusion might elaborate on the importance of the work or suggest applications and extensions.
The acknowledgement should be concise and must be written about the original supporters of the work and funding agency.
References are cited in the text just by square brackets . Two or more references at a time may be put in one set of brackets [3, 4]. The references are to be numbered in the order in which they are cited in the text and are to be listed at the end of the contribution under the heading References, see our example below.
Reference: Using the Vancouver reference style
Recently, the health sciences community has reduced the bias and imprecision of traditional literature summaries through the development of rigorous criteria for both literature overviews [1-3] and practice guidelines [4, 5].
- Shao Y, Xu F, Sun X, Bao J,Beta T. Identification and quantification of phenolicacids and anthocyanins as antioxidants in bran, embryo and endosperm of white, red and black rice kernels (Oryza sativa L.).J Cereal Sci. 2014;59(2):211-8.
*All the journal names must be in the abbreviation form; see information at: https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/J_abrvjt.html
- Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Krettek C, Anderson PA. Skeletal trauma: basic science, management, and reconstruction. Vol. 2. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020.
Chapter in a Book :
- Teixidor F, Viñas C, Planas JG, Romero I, Núñez R. Chapter One - Advances in the catalytic and photocatalytic behavior of carborane derived metal complexes. In: Diéguez M, Núñez R, editors. Advances in Catalysis. 71: Academic Press; 2022. p. 1-45.
Conference Paper :
- Christensen S, Oppacher F. An analysis of Koza's computational effort statistic for genetic programming. In: Foster JA, Lutton E, Miller J, Ryan C, Tettamanzi AG, editors. Genetic programming. EuroGP 2002: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Genetic Programming; 2002 Apr 3-5; Kinsdale, Ireland. Berlin: Springer; 2002. p. 182-9.
Thesis / Dissertation :
- Sue-eng S. Preparation of polymethacrylic acid-block-polystyrene particles by self-assembly mechanism in emulsion polymerization [dissertation]. Faculty of Science and Technology: Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi; 2018.
- assignee. Polymerizable dental barrier material 2007.