Mobile random text-based voice authentication for older adults: A pilot study

Main Article Content

Jedsada Boonsiri
Thippaya Chintakovid
Nalinpat Bhumpenpein

Abstract

Thai older adults often struggle to use existing smartphone authentication systems due to age-related problems. Random text-based voice authentication, which resists Replay attacks and reduces the need to memorize information, is a suitable alternative. Nevertheless, past studies have insufficiently focused on usability, leading this research effort to improve the usability of voice authentication for older adults. As part of the research, this study seeks to develop a random text-based voice authentication suitable for older adults. The prototype was implemented as a mobile application, VAuth, with Voice User Interface (VUI) as a primary interaction method. Formative Usability Testing was conducted iteratively and incrementally to evaluate and refine VAuth. The first version of VAuth was well-received despite initial problems, which were resolved subsequently. Overall results indicated that VAuth is usable for older adults. Participants could complete all given tasks (enrollment and verification) through VUIs. They responded favorably to VUIs in general and acknowledged their advantages. Moreover, the results from the SEQ and SUS questionnaires aligned with participants' positive opinions. The dialogue design was adequate, and older adults could correctly pronounce Thai-word passphrases in most cases. While the accuracy of Thai speech recognition remains an issue, progress in voice recognition may eventually overcome it. Despite these encouraging results, this study still has limitations. While the test helped determine if VAuth is a viable solution, it did not confirm whether VAuth remains usable when deployed in larger, different contexts, such as a noisy environment or public places. Thus, further studies are needed to compare VAuth with existing authentication methods with an enlarged sample size in multiple usage scenarios.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Boonsiri J, Chintakovid T, Bhumpenpein N. Mobile random text-based voice authentication for older adults: A pilot study. J Appl Res Sci Tech [Internet]. 2024 Aug. 13 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];23(2):255839. Available from: https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rmutt-journal/article/view/255839
Section
Research Articles

References

Fisk AD, Rogers WA, Charness N, Czaja SJ, Sharit J. Chapter 2 Characteristics of Older Adult Users. In: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, Second Edition (Human Factors & Aging). 2nd ed. CRC Press; 2009. p. 13-27.

Hundal JK, Hamde ST. Some feature extraction techniques for voice based authentication system. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering; 2017. p. 419-21.

Bella, Hendryli J, Herwindiati DE. Voice Authentication Model for One-time Password Using Deep Learning Models. In: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Big Data Engineering and Technology. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2020. p. 35-9.

Blue L, Abdullah H, Vargas L, Traynor P. 2MA: Verifying Voice Commands via Two Microphone Authentication. In: Proceedings of the 2018 on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2018. p. 89-100.

Yan Z, Zhao S. A Usable Authentication System Based on Personal Voice Challenge. In: 2016 International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data (CBD); 2016. p. 194-9.

Rehman UU, Lee S. Natural Language Voice Based Authentication Mechanism for Smartphones (Poster). In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2019. p. 600-1.

Babkin S, Epishkina A. Authentication Protocols Based on One-Time Passwords. In: 2019 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus); 2019. p. 1794-8.

Wu Z, Gao S, Cling ES, Li H. A study on replay attack and anti-spoofing for text-dependent speaker verification. In: Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference, 2014 Asia-Pacific. 2014. p. 1-5.

Gollan TH, Goldrick M. Aging deficits in naturalistic speech production and monitoring revealed through reading aloud. Psychol Aging. 2019;34(1):25-42.

Dodd C, Athauda R, Adam M. Designing User Interfaces for the Elderly: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Australasian Conference on Information Systems; 2017 May 5; Hobart, Australia: 2017.

Wong CY, Ibrahim R, Hamid TA, Mansor EI. Usability and Design Issues of Smartphone User Interface and Mobile Apps for Older Adults. In: Abdullah N, Wan Adnan WA, Foth M, editors. User Science and Engineering. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 93-104.

Ziman R, Walsh G. Factors Affecting Seniors' Perceptions of Voice-enabled User Interfaces. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2018. p. LBW591:1-LBW591:6.

Kowalski J, Jaskulska A, Skorupska K, Abramczuk K, Biele C, Kopeć W, et al. Older Adults and Voice Interaction: A Pilot Study with Google Home. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2019. p. 1-6.

Kim S, Choudhury A. Exploring older adults' perception and use of smart speaker-based voice assistants: A longitudinal study. Comput Hum Behav. 2021;124:106914.

Stigall B, Waycott J, Baker S, Caine K. Older Adults' Perception and Use of Voice User Interfaces: A Preliminary Review of the Computing Literature. In: Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2019. p. 423-7.

Schlögl S, Chollet G, Garschall M, Tscheligi M, Legouverneur G. Exploring Voice User Interfaces for Seniors. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2013. p. 52:1-52:2.

Chang YT, Dupuis MJ. My Voiceprint Is My Authenticator: A Two-Layer Authentication Approach Using Voiceprint for Voice Assistants. In: 2019 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence Computing, Advanced Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing Communications, Cloud Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI). Leicester, UK; 2019. p. 1318-25.

Harris RA. Chapter 14 - Scripting. In: Harris RA, editor. Voice Interaction Design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann; 2005. p. 423-72.

Johnson J. Chapter 7 - Our Attention is Limited; Our Memory is Imperfect. In: Johnson J, editor. Designing with the Mind in Mind (Third Edition). Morgan Kaufmann; 2021. p. 103-24.

Eric-urban. What is the Speech service? - Azure Cognitive Services [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 8]. Available from: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/speech-service/overview.

Lazar J, Feng JH, Hochheiser H. Chapter 10 - Usability testing. In: Lazar J, Feng JH, Hochheiser H, editors. Research Methods in Human Computer Interaction (Second Edition). Boston: Morgan Kaufmann; 2017. p. 263-98.

Sauro J, Lewis JR. Chapter 8 - Standardized usability questionnaires. In: Sauro J, Lewis JR, editors. Quantifying the User Experience (Second Edition). Boston: Morgan Kaufmann; 2016. p. 185-248.

Brooke J. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval Ind. 1995;189.

Lewis JR, Sauro J. Can I leave this one out? the effect of dropping an item from the SUS. J Usability Stud. 2017;13(1):38-46.

Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud. 2009;4(3):114-23.

Kantithammakorn P, Punyabukkana P, Pratanwanich PN, Hemrungrojn S, Chunharas C, Wanvarie D. Using automatic speech recognition to assess Thai speech language fluency in the montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(4):1583.

Muangjaroen S, Udomsiri S. Continuous speech commands recognition with Thai language used support vector machine technique: A case study of speech commands control for mobile robots. Prz. 2023;99(6):181-7.

Rukwong N, Pongpinigpinyo S. An acoustic feature-based deep learning model for automatic Thai vowel pronunciation recognition. Appl Sci. 2022;12(13):6595.

Fisk AD, Rogers WA, Charness N, Czaja SJ, Sharit J. Chapter 3 Guiding the Design Process. In: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, Second Edition (Human Factors & Aging). 2nd ed. CRC Press; 2009. p. 29-45.