Strategic environmental assessment of Thai river basins: Incorporating climate change considerations
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
It is globally recognized that climate change is increasingly affecting sustainable development. Given these challenges, it is imperative to incorporate climate change considerations as part of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), a tool used for sustainable development and planning strategies. The Thai government is in the process of developing river basin management schemes and updating SEA for all the river basins in the country. Considering climate change in future development planning processes would ensure that the outcomes enable more sustainable development. In this article, SEA reports for Thai river basins that have been completed were examined to determine if climate change was considered and how it was done. Analyses were conducted for each of the four phases of SEA, i.e., establishing the context for SEA, implementing SEA, informing, and influencing decisions, monitoring and evaluating plans. The checklist criteria were used to analyze climate change impacts in the river basin SEA reports, focusing specifically on climate change or global warming impacts that lead to serious disasters in the river basins. The results showed that 7 out of the 9 reports currently consider climate change impacts, but not in all phases of the SEA. The linkage of climate change impact analyses between the different phases was weak. There were only 4 reports that sufficiently considered climate change impacts in the second phase of the SEA. These reports used both qualitative and quantitative tools that were appropriate for predicting climate change impacts and with a link to the third and fourth phases. As a result, most of the SEA reports were insufficient in considering climate change impacts.
Download : Graphical abstract
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis [Internet]. IPCC. 2021 [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available From: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/.
European Union. Guidance on Integrating Climate Change and Biodiversity into Strategic Environmental Assessment. The European Union; 2013.
Hottest July ever signals 'era of global boiling has arrived' says UN chief UN News Global perspective Human stories [Internet]. UN. 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/07/1139162.
Provisional State of the Global Climate 2022 [Internet]. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/07/1139162.
Palmer MA, Reidy Liermann CA, Nilsson C, Flörke M, Alcamo J, Sam Lake P, et al. Climate change and the world's river basins: Anticipating management options. Front Ecol Environ. 2008;6(2):81-9.
Global Climate Risk Index [Internet]. Germanwatch. 2021. [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available From: https://www.germanwatch.org/en/19777.
Thailand Economic Monitoring [Internet]. THE World Bank. 2012. [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available From: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/thailand/publication/thailand-economic-monitor-reports.
Assessing the impact of climate change on water supply sources and WSS systems in Moldova and inventory possible adaptation measures (Task 1). European Union and co-sponsored by the OECD EAP Task Force; 2013.
Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA): guidelines for Pacific island countries and territories. 2020.
Thérivel R. Strategic environmental assessment in Central Europe. Project Appraisal. 1997;12(3):151-60.
Lobos V, Partidário MdR. Theory versus practice in Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). Environ Impact Asses. 2014;48:34-46.
Gao J, Christensen P, Li W. Application of the WEAP model in strategic environmental assessment: Experiences from a case study in an arid/semi-arid area in China. J Environ Manage. 2017;198(Pt 1):363-71.
Jaeckel A. Strategic environmental planning for deep seabed mining in the area. Marine Policy. 2020;114:103423.
Thérivel R, González A. Is SEA worth it? Short-term costs v. long-term benefits of strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Asses. 2020;83:106411.
Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP). Strategic Environmental Assessment Guideline: Thailand. 2011.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. Strategic Environmental Assessment Guideline: Thailand. 2020.
United Nations Development Programme, The REC and the Government of Georgia. A Guide to Strategic Environmental Assessment. 2006.
The World Bank, The Asian Development Bank. Climate Risk Country Profiles: Thailand. 2021.
The World Bank. Thailand environment monitor: Integrated Water Resources Management: A Way Forward. Disclosure Authorized; 2011.
The World Bank. Strategic Environmental Assessment in Policy and Sector Reform2007.
The World Bank. World Development Report. 2002.
The Environmental Protection Agency. Good Practice Guidance on Cumulative Effects Assessment in Strategic Environmental Assessment. 2020.
Partidário MdR. Strategic Environmental Assessment Better Practice Guide: methodological guidance for strategic thinking in SEA. [REN] Portuguese Environment Agency and Redes Energéticas Nacionais; 2012.
Organisation for Economic Co-Opaeration and Development. Applying Strategic Environmental Assessment. Good Practice Guidance for Development Co-Opaeration 2006. p. www.seataskteam.net.
National Environment Management Authority. Guidelines for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in Uganda. 2020.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. Strategic Environmental Assessment Guideline: Thailand (revised edition). 2021.
Suban L, Suchai T. Development of stakeholder data management system. Research Journal Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. 2021;20(1):68-7.
Rega C, Baldizzone G. Public participation in strategic environmental assessment: A practitioners' perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2015;50:105-15.
Posas PJ. Exploring climate change criteria for strategic environmental assessments. Progress in Planning. 2011;75(3):109-54.
Bony S, Fichefet T, Fyfe J, Kattsov V, Pitman A, Shukla J, et al. Climate Models and Their Evaluation. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); 2007.
Suban P. The relationship between satellite rainfall and the gauge rainfall in Nan River Basin. Research Journal Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. 2016;15(1):51-6.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate C. Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability 2023.
ONWR. Strategic Environmental Assessment Chi River Basin. 2020 January.
ONWR. Strategic Environmental Assessment Sakae Krang River Basin. 2020 January.
ONWR. Strategic Environmental Assessment Prachin Buri-Bang Prakong River Basin. 2020 March.
ONWR. Strategic Environmental Assessment Peninsula-East Coast. 2020 September.
ONWR. Strategic Environmental Assessment Mun River Basin. 2021.
ONWR. Strategic Environmental Assessment and Water Resource Management Master Plan Phetchburi-Prachuap Khiri Khan River Basin. 2021.
ONWR. Strategic Environmental Assessment Peninsula-West Coast. 2021 January.
ONWR. Strategic Environmental Assessment Mae Klong River Basin. 2022.
ONWR. Strategic Environmental Assessment Chi River Basin Northeast Khong. 2022.
Zhang Q, Gemmer M, Chen J. Climate changes and flood/drought risk in the Yangtze Delta, China, during the past millennium. Quatern Int. 2008;176-177:62-9.
Qi P, Xia Z, Zhang G, Zhang W, Chang Z. Effects of climate change on agricultural water resource carrying capacity in a high-latitude basin. J Hydrol. 2021;597.
Shrestha S, Lohpaisankrit W. Flood hazard assessment under climate change scenarios in the Yang River Basin, Thailand. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 2017;6(2):285-98.
Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic. 2009;9(2):189-212.
Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ. 2007;60(3):498-508.
Cinelli M, Coles SR, Kirwan K. Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment. Ecol Indic. 2014;46:138-48.
Ye B, Jiang J, Liu J, Zheng Y, Zhou N. Research on quantitative assessment of climate change risk at an urban scale: Review of recent progress and outlook of future direction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021;135:110415.
Willems P, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, Olsson J, Nguyen VTV. Climate change impact assessment on urban rainfall extremes and urban drainage: Methods and shortcomings. Atmos Res. 2012;103:106-18.
Somphinith M, Winai C, Kanoksri S, Khanittha C. Prediction of Future Drought in Thailand under Changing Climate by Using SPI and SPEI Indices. 2020.
Larsen SV, Kørnøv L, Driscoll P. Avoiding climate change uncertainties in strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Asses. 2013;43:144-50.
Carter J, Howe J. The water framework directive and the strategic environmental assessment directive: Exploring the linkages. Environ Impact Asses. 2006;26(3):287-300.