Assessing GHG Emission Reductions for Organization through the Installation of Solar PV Rooftop On-grid System

Authors

  • Sommai Saramath Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna
  • Jutaporn Chanathaworn School of Renewable Energy, Maejo University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55003/ETH.410401

Keywords:

Carbon footprint for organization, Greenhouse gases, Solar rooftop, Global warming potential, Carbon dioxide

Abstract

The Earth's surface temperature is steadily increasing due to the accumulation of greenhouse gases, a phenomenon known as global warming. Human activities are the root cause of this significant global issue. Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is one of the most critical actions in climate change mitigation. Organizations can engage in activities that promote change and reduce greenhouse gases by acknowledging the significance of addressing climate change. By reducing GHG emissions and promoting the use of renewable energy, organizations can begin to address environmental issues. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation is to assess the reduction of GHG emissions in an educational institution by substituting electricity consumption from the electrical grid with renewable energy in the form of a solar PV rooftop on-grid system. The School of Renewable Energy's GHG emissions were assessed, covering three scopes of GHG emissions activities: direct emissions, indirect emissions, and other indirect emissions. The organization's activity data were collected over a 12-month period. Without installing a solar panel system, the organization reported total GHG emissions of 310.40 tCO2e, relying solely on imported electricity for internal use. The highest GHG emissions were from Scope 2, amounting to 239.38 tCO2e, primarily due to electricity importation. Scope 3 had the second highest GHG emissions, totaling 65.76 tCO2e, resulting from employee commuting and the use of purchased goods such as paper and tap water. Scope 1 had the lowest GHG emissions at 5.26 tCO2e, produced by the combustion of diesel and gasoline in both stationary and mobile sources, as well as CH4 emissions from the septic tank. The percentage of GHG emissions from Scope 2 activities was 77.12%, which was considered to have a significant environmental impact and contribute to global warming. This was because 478,851 kWh of electricity were imported. The installation of on-grid solar cells for power generation reduced imported electricity to 113,120 kWh. Consequently, GHG emissions from Scope 2 decreased to 56.55 tCO2e, leading to an overall reduction in the organization's GHG emissions to 127.57 tCO2e. The organization's GHG emissions decreased by 182.83 tCO2e as a result of using alternative energy to generate electricity. This assessment can serve as a database for educational institutions and prepare the government to report greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, it can serve as carbon credits for trading and exchanging carbon with other organizations to offset GHG emissions from various activities. In addition, it endorses the government's goal of achieving carbon neutrality and net zero emissions in the future.

References

K. H. D. Tang, “Climate Change in Malaysia: Trends, Contributors, Impacts, Mitigation and Adaptations,” Science of the Total Environment. vol. 650, pp. 1858–1871, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.316.

K. Iempremjit, “Effect of Biodiesel-ethanol Fuel Blends on Performance and Combustion Characteristics in a Small Diesel Engine during Start of Engine,” Ladkrabang Engineering Journal, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 24–32, 2020.

M. Pazzini, C. Lantieri, V. Vignali, A. Simone, G. Dondi, G. Luppino and D. Grasso, “Case Studies in the Emilia Romagna Region in Support of Intermodality and Accessibility of Public Transport,” in Proc. 5th Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility, Virtual CSUM2020, Greece, Jun. 17–19, 2021, pp. 65–74.

F. Censorii, L. Cotignoli, V. Vignali and A. Bartoli, “Sustainable and Resistant Road Infrastructures: The Role of the Envision Framework as a Guide to a New Design Approach,” coatings, vol. 12, no. 2, 2022, Art. no. 236, doi: 10.3390/coatings12020236.

R. Battistini, F. Passarini, R. Marrollo, C. Lantieri and V. Vignali, “How to Assess the Carbon Footprint of a Large University? The Case Study of University of Bologna’s Multicampus Organization,” energies, vol. 16, no. 1, 2023, Art. no. 166, doi: 10.3390/en16010166.

IPCC, “Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report,” IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, Fifth Assessment Rep., 2014.

J. Kiehle, M. Kopsakangas-Savolainen, M. Hilli and E. Pongracz, “Carbon footprint at institutions of higher education: The case of the University of Oulu,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 329, 2023, Art. no. 117056, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117056.

K. Chaivanich, “Carbon Footprint of an Organization: A Case Study of the Department of Ordnance Engineering Academic Division, Chulachomklao Royal Military Academy,” Science and Technology Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University Journal, vol. 12, no. 15, pp. 48–57, 2020.

N. Hayiwangoh, P Pradabphetrat, V.Rangpan, S. Jijai and E. Saniso, “Carbon Footprint Assessment and Actions to Promote Green University of Rajabhat Universities in Southern Thailand,” Interdisciplinary Research Review, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1–6, 2023.

T. Maimun, S. Teekasap, A. Sareephattananon and B. Rattanatai, “Organization Carbon Footprint Assessment of Eastern Asia University,” EAU Heritage Journal Science and Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, 195–209, 2018.

S. Sudha and D. Hirunl, “Carbon Footprint of an Organization Case Study of Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University,” Engineering Journal Chiang Mai University, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 227–233, 2019.

P. Usubharatana and H. Phungrussami, “Carbon Footprint of Organization: Case Study for Thammasat University,” Thai Science and Technology Journal, vol. 22, vol. 1, pp. 1–12, 2014.

S. Tangprasert and N. Leeprechanon, “The Mechanism to Drive Carbon Neutrality Policy and Net-Zero Emissions for the Building Sector in Thailand,” Science & Technology Asia, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 75–87, 2023, doi: 10.14456/scitechasia.2023.28.

C. A. Tu, L. V. Quy and N. D. Toan, “Estimation of Methane Emission from Domestic Wastewater in Cau river Basin by 2023,” Journal of Climate Change Science, no. 23, pp. 69–76, 2022.

C. Pongvijarn and S. Klongboonjit, “The Feasibility Study of Installing Hybrid Solar PV Systems for Residential Building: A Case Study of an Apartment with 26 Rooms,” Ladkrabang Engineering Journal, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 167–180, 2022.

C. J. L. Balsas, “Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses,” Transport Policy, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–49, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00028-8.

S. Sommai, C. Jutaporn, P. Sarawut, J. Chawaroj and P. Panuwit, “The Testing of Pyrolysis Reactor with Separation of Condenser for the Production of Liquid Biofuel from Plastic Waste and Economic Evaluation,” in The 23th Transfer of Heat and Mass Energy in Thermal Devices and Processes, Phetchaburi, Thailand, Mar. 14–15, 2024, pp. 273–280.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-25

How to Cite

[1]
S. . Saramath and J. Chanathaworn, “Assessing GHG Emission Reductions for Organization through the Installation of Solar PV Rooftop On-grid System”, Eng. & Technol. Horiz., vol. 41, no. 4, p. 410401, Dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Articles