Analysis and Design Approaches for the Transition Zone between Bridges and Embankments in Railway Tracks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55003/ETH.410210Keywords:
Railway track, Transition zone, Finite element methodAbstract
This study presents an analysis of stability improvement methods for the transition zone between bridge structures and embankments in railway systems using the Finite Element Method (FEM) model. The study aims to provide guidelines for designing such transition zones. The three methods investigated are recommended by the International Union of Railways (UIC) standard 719R: 1. Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français method (SNCF), 2. Magyar Államvasutak method (MAV), and 3. Deutsche Bahn method (DB). Initially, the interaction between the rail and bridge models was calibrated using the E1-3 case from the UIC 774-3, which yielded results close to the reference values. Additionally, it was found that analyzing the sequence of applied loads provides better results than directly combining the responses from each load type. Subsequently, the study examined the stability improvement of the transition zones using the rail properties from the UIC 54 and the load standards from U20, which are applicable in Thailand. The analysis revealed that all three methods effectively reduced settlement in the transition zone, with the DB method achieving the highest reduction at 36.18%, and the SNCF and MAV methods achieving an equal reduction of 32.89%. However, considering both settlement reduction and construction techniques, the SNCF method is recommended as the most suitable approach for the design and construction to improve the stability of transition zones.
References
A. Paixão, E. Fortunato and R. Calçada, “Transition zones to railway bridges: Track measurements and numerical modelling,” Engineering Structures, vol. 80, pp. 435–443, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.024.
T. Dahlberg, “Railway track stiffness variations – consequences and countermeasures,” International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2010.
M. Banimahd, P. K. Woodward, J. Kennedy and G. Medero, “Behaviour of train-track interaction in stiffness transitions,” Proc. of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 205–214, doi: 10.1680/tran.10.00030.
Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and Planning (OTP), Bangkok, Thailand. Manual of design and construction of railway, 2015. Accessed: Nov. 16, 2023 [Online]. Available:https://www.otp.go.th/uploads/tiny_uploads/ProjectOTP/2560/Project06/ManualDesign.pdf.
P. Paoleng, R. Parichatprecha and S. Suthasupradit, “Behavior of Railway Track at Transition Zone and Performance Improvement Techniques: A Review,” Naresuan University Engineering Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 74–87, 2018. (in Thai)
Earthworks and track-bed layers for railway lines, UIC 719R, International Union of Railways (UIC), Paris, France, 1994.
B. Dareeju, C. Gallage and M. Dhanasekar, “A comparative analysis of the conservative bridge transition design approaches,” in 2014 Proc. Railway Excellence: Rail Transport for Vital Economy, Robert Schweiger, ed., Adelaide, Australia, May 5–7, 2014, pp. 649–657.
C. Esveld, “Track stability and longitudinal forces,” in Modern railway track, 2nd ed. Zaltbommel, Netherlands: MRT productions, 2001, ch. 7, sec. 7.3–7.4, pp. 212–223.
P. Ruge and C. Birk, “Longitudinal forces in continuously welded rails on bridge decks due to nonlinear track–bridge interaction,” Computers & Structures, vol. 85, no. 7–8, pp. 458–475, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.09.008.
R. Sañudo, L. dell'Olio, J.A. Casado, I.A. Carrascal and S. Diego, “Track transitions in railways: A review,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 112, pp. 140–157, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.084.
O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, “Generalization of the finite element concepts. Galerkin-weighted residual and variational approaches,” in The Finite Element Method, Vol. 1: The Basis, 5th ed. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000, ch. 3, sec. 3.2–3.6, pp. 42–60.
W. Kanok-Nukulchai, W. Sommanawat and C. Buachart, “Overview of the finite element method,” Thailand Engineering Journal, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 58–69, 2021. (in Thai)
J. Real-Herraiz, C. Zamorano-Martin, T. Real-Herraiz and S. Morales-Lvorra, “New Transition Wedge Design Composed by Prefabricated Reinforced Concrete Slabs,” Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 13, pp. 1431–1449, 2016, doi: 10.1590/1679-78252556.
H. Wang, VL. Markine, IY. Shevtsov and R. Dollevoet, “Analysis of the dynamic behaviour of a railway track in transition zones with differential settlement,” in Proc. of the 2015 Joint Rail Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, Mar. 2015, pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1115/JRC2015-5735.
Midas Information Technology Co., Ltd., “Midas Civil.” midasoft.com. https://www.midasoft.com/bridge-library/civil/products/midascivil (accessed Jun. 21, 2020).
Track/Bridge Interaction – Recommendations for calculations, UIC 774-3, International Union of Railways (UIC), Paris, France, 2001.
E. Oñate, “Slender plane beams. Euler-Bernoulli theory,” in Structural Analysis with the Finite Element Method. Linear Statics: Volume 2: Beams, Plates and Shells, Barcelona, Spain: International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), 2013, ch. 1, sec. 1.3, pp. 6–20.
Midas Information Technology Co., Ltd., “Rail-structure interaction in accordance with UIC774-3.” scribd.com. https://www.scribd.com/document/451407580/Rail-Structure-interaction-midas-analysis-pdf (accessed May 17, 2024).
Midas Information Technology Co., Ltd., “Railway bridge and composite girder bridge analysis.” slideshare.net. https://www.slideshare.net/MidasIT/rail-bridge-and-composite-girder-bridge-analysis (accessed Apr. 20, 2024).
Q. Fu and C. Zheng, “Three-dimensional dynamic analyses of track-embankment-ground system subjected to high-speed train loads,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, 2014, Art. no.924592, doi: 10.1155/2014/924592.
K. Dong, D. P. Connolly, O. Laghrouche, P. K. Woodward and P. Alves Costa, “The stiffening of soft soils on railway lines,” Transportation Geotechnics, vol. 17, pp. 178–191, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.09.004.
Soil Young’s modulus, geotect data, Sep. 17, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://www.geotesting.org/parameter/soil-young-s-modulus.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The published articles are copyrighted by the School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang.
The statements contained in each article in this academic journal are the personal opinions of each author and are not related to King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang and other faculty members in the institute.
Responsibility for all elements of each article belongs to each author; If there are any mistakes, each author is solely responsible for his own articles.
