The Selections of Appropriate Alternative Intersection Improvements Base on Effectiveness Measures of Traffic Models and Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)

Authors

  • Patchara Srisupoh Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus
  • Wuttikrai Chaipanha Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus
  • Thanapol Promraksa Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus
  • Patiphan Kaewwichian Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Khon Kaen Campus

Keywords:

Intersection, Traffic simulation model, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Abstract

This study was aimed at selecting the appropriate intersection alternative at the crossing of Rural Road construction project, MH.4040, and Highway No. 12, using the Measure of Effectiveness from the traffic simulation and the analytical hierarchical process. The study results showed that the experts gave the highest weight to traffic engineering (0.4327), the second highest weight to environmental impact (0.2482), followed by economics (0.2191). The delay at the intersection is the secondary factor that receives the highest weight (0.2278). It has been concluded that the second alternative, the overpass along Highway 12, is the most appropriate alternative, receiving the score of 0.9736 or 97.36%. This alternative is outstanding in terms of traffic engineering and construction cost. However, there are the drawbacks in the fuel consumption and environmental impact of Alternative 2, which are worse than those of Alternatives 3 and 4. The results of the study indicated that the Measure of Effectiveness used in the traffic model, which included the multiplying parameters of all factors, could yield reasonable calculated outcomes. It omits the qualitative factor, reduces complexity in surveying and calculative, and will be another alternative for selection of an intersection system in the future.

References

Transport data and statistics–Office of Mukdahan land transport, Jun 20, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.dlt.go.th/site/mukdahan/m-news/11533/view.php?did=34250 (accessed Jun. 20, 2022).

Average annual daily traffic (AADT)–Open Government Data of Thailand, Jun 20, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://data.go.th/dataset/aadt64

Department of Rural Road (DRR). “Report on survey results and analyze data for forecasting traffic volumes, Survey Detailed Design and Environmental Impact Assessment (IEE) for the road construction of the principle city plan, Route NG.2 and NG.3 Road, Mukdahan principle city plan”, DRR., Bangkok, Thailand. 2009,

T. L. Saaty, “The analytic hierarchy process,” in The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill International Book Co., 1980, ch. 1, sec. 1, pp. 3–34.

T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008, doi: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.

K. Wunderlich, M. Vasudevan and P. Wang, “TAT Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software 2019 Update to the 2004 Version,” U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA, Rep. FHWA-HOP-18-036, 2019.

W. Burghout, H. Koutsopoulos, and I. Andréasson, “Hybrid Mesoscopic-Microscopic Traffic Simulation,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1934, no. 1, pp. 218–255, 2005, doi: 10.3141/1934-23.

The Institution of Highways & Transportation, “Traffic microsimulation modeling,” Network Management Notes, pp. 1–4, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://www.ciht.org.uk/media/4365/traffic_microsimulation_modelling.pdf

T. Kojima, A. Fukuda, T. Ishizaka and P. Luathep, “Study on the Evaluation of the Roundabout Utilizing Micro Traffic Simulation Model” in 7th ATRANS Symposium: Young Researcher's Forum, Bangkok, Thailand, Aug. 22, 2014, pp. 242–247.

P. Warasak, S. Thanet, S. Wichuda and D. Atthaphon, “Analysis of traffic management for motorcycles at traffic signal junctions,” in proceeding the 18th National Civil Engineering Conference, Chiang Mai. Thailand, May 8–10, 2013, pp. TRP 236–TRP 242.

Y. Chaiwat and L. Paramet, “An Analysis of Traffic Management of Multiple Consecutive Intersections: A Case Study of Hat Yai Municipality,” Journal of Engineering and Innovation, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 103–114, 2015.

R. Chayada and K. Noppadol, “Energy and Environmental Assessment for Intersection Design Control in University Campus,” in proceeding the 25th National Civil Engineering Conference, Chonburi, Thailand, Jul. 15–17, 2020, pp. ENV051–ENV059.

K. Wanwisa and P. Jumrus, “Traffic Operational Analysis of Continuous Flow Urban Interchange Using Micro Simulation Modeling Technique :A CaseStudy of Dat Daruni School, Chachoengsao,” Ladkrabang Engineering Journal, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2018.

W. Muanmas, H. Phongtorn and S. Sittiwat, “Recommendation for improvement of traffic circulation during Kaset fair,” Ladkrabang Engineering Journal, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 72–77, 2016.

Department of Rural Road (DRR). Survey project designed to solve traffic problems at the intersection on CR.5023, Rob Wiang Subdistrict, Mueang District, Chiang Rai Province.”.,DRR. BKK, Thailand. 2019,

P. Thanapol, S. Thaned and S. Wichuda, “Vehicle actuated signal control for low carbon society,” International Journal of GEOMATE, vol. 16, no. 55, pp. 56–91, 2019, doi: 10.21660/2019.55.4766.

J. A. Gómez Romero, R. Soto Flores and S. Garduño Román, “Determination of the Weightings of HydroelectricSustainability Criteria by Combining AHP and GP Extended Methods,” Ingeniería, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 116–142, 2019, doi: 10.14483/23448393.14469.

J. Greenbaum, “A design of one's own: Towards participatory design in the United States”. in Participatory Design, D. Schuler and A. Namioka Eds., Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993, ch. 3, pp. 27–37.

M. G. Melón, P. A. Beltran and M. C. G. Cruz, “An AHP-based evaluation procedure for Innovative Educational Projects: A face-to-face vs. computer-mediated case study,” Omega, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 754–765, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.01.005.

Ewing R, “Traffic Calming: State of the practice,” Institute of Transportation Engineering, Washington D. C., USA, 1999.

Protocol for Vissim Simulation, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA, USA, 2014, pp. 13–21.

VISSIM 6 User manual, PTV AG., Karlsruhe, Germany, 2014.

W. Tony, “Calibrating Freeway Simulation Models In Vissim,” M.S. Thesis, Dept. Civil Engineering, Washington Univ., Seattle, WA, USA, 2006.

B. (Brian) Park and J. D. Schneeberger, “Microscopic Simulation Model Calibration and Validation: Case Study of VISSIM Simulation Model for a Coordinated Actuated Signal System,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1856, no. 1, pp. 185–192, 2003, doi: 10.3141/1856-20.

S. Somkane, “Factor Priority Analysis used in considering the improvement of the Department of Highways for the improvement of the junction by hierarchical analysis process,” M.E. Thesis, Dept. Engineering and Construction Management, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand, 2005.

S. Nantawan, V. Chavalek and K. Aswin, “Evaluation of appropriate configurations for urban-grade separation intersections, a case study : Khae Rai intersection-highway 302 (Rattanathibet Road) and highway 306 (Tivanon Road),” Kasetsart Engineering Journal, vol. 22, no. 70, pp. 57–69, 2010.

M. Worawit and T. Kittichai, “A Study of Appropriate Configurations for Rural Service Interchange A Case Study of Highway No. 35 (Rama II Road) and Rural Road 2055 Interchange,” Technical Education Journal King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 34–46, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

[1]
P. . Srisupoh, W. . Chaipanha, T. . Promraksa, and P. Kaewwichian, “The Selections of Appropriate Alternative Intersection Improvements Base on Effectiveness Measures of Traffic Models and Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) ”, Eng. & Technol. Horiz., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 86–102, Dec. 2022.

Issue

Section

Research Articles