Reducing Sugar Production from Empty Fruit Bunches with Enzyme Cellic Ctec2®
Main Article Content
Abstract
Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch (OPEFB) was an agricultural residue that consists mostly of lignocellulosic material (57.88% cellulose, 23.81% hemicellulose and 16.51% lignin by weight). In this study, OPEFB was pretreated with 10, 15 and 20% (w/v) of sodium hydroxide for 60 minutes. The best pretreatment of OPEFB was 15% of sodium hydroxide. The result of pretreatment showed that the percentage of cellulose increased by 14.28% and the percentages of lignin decreased by 3.41%. After that, the pretreated OPEFB was hydrolyzed by Cellic Ctec2®enzyme with substrate loading of 5, 7, 10 and 15% (w/v), enzyme loading of 20 FPU/g substrate and 140 rpm for 5 days. The highest reducing sugar from OPEFB was 85.79 g·L–1 by using 10% substrate loading for 5 days. The reducing sugar consists of 60.29 g/L of glucose and 12.51 g/L of xylose by HPLC analysis.
Article Details
The articles published are the opinion of the author only. The author is responsible for any legal consequences. That may arise from that article.
References
[2] S. Sumathi, S. P. Chai, and A. R. Mohamed, “Utilization of oil palm as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2404–2421, 2008.
[3] F. Hamzah, A. Idris, and T.K. Shuan, “Preliminary study on enzymatic hydrolysis of treated oil palm (Elaeis) Empty Fruit Bunches Fibre (EFB) by using combination of cellulase and β 1-4 glucosidase,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1055–1059, 2011.
[4] E. Triwahyuni, Muryanto, Y. Sudiyani, and H. Abimanyu, “The effect of substrate loading on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process for bioethanol production from oil palm empty fruit bunches,” Energy Procedia, vol. 68, pp. 138–146, 2015.
[5] H. K. Goering and P. J. Van, Forage Fiber Analysis: Apparatus Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications, U.S. Government Print. Office, DC: Washington, 1970.
[6] G. L. MILLER, “Use of dinitrosaiicyiic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 426–428, 1959.
[7] M. M. Ishola, Isroi, and M. J. Taherzadeh, “Effect of fungal and phosphoric acid pretreatment on ethanol production from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches (OPEFB),” Bioresour Technol, vol. 165, pp. 9–12, 2014.
[8] D. Dahnum, S.O. Tasum, E. Triwahyuni, M. Nurdin, and H. Abimanyu, “Comparison of SHF and SSF processes using enzyme and dry yeast for optimization of bioethanol production from empty fruit bunch,” Energy Procedia, vol. 68, pp. 107–1165, 2015.
[9] L. W. Lai and A. Idris, Comparison of steam-alkalichemical and microwave-alkali pretreatment for enhancing the enzymatic saccharification of oil palm trunk, Renewable Energy, vol. 99, pp. 738–746, 2016.
[10] A. Modenbach, “Sodium hydroxide pretreatment of corn stover and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis: An investigation of yields, kinetic modeling and glucose recovery,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, University of Kentucky, USA, 2013.