Quantifying and Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Egg-Laying Hen Farming: A Path Towards Carbon Neutrality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69650/rast.2024.258766Keywords:
Egg-Laying Hen Farming , Greenhouse Gas , Environmental Impact , Life Cycle Assessment, Solar Cell, Carbon NeutralityAbstract
This study presents a comprehensive framework for assessing and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in commercial egg-laying hen farming in Uttaradit Province, with the aim of achieving carbon neutrality within the poultry sector. Employing a detailed life cycle assessment (LCA) over a 450-day production period, this research identifies key sources of emissions, with feed consumption identified as the largest contributor, followed by water use and energy demands. To address these emissions, the study explores several innovative strategies: transitioning to solar photovoltaic systems for lighting and water pumping, shifting from diesel to biodiesel for fuel, and optimizing feed compositions. Additionally, advanced manure management practices are proposed to reduce methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Collectively, these interventions could significantly diminish the emissions associated with hen farming operations, thereby advancing environmental sustainability. This work not only provides actionable insights for poultry farms seeking to lower their emissions but also offers a scalable and adaptable model with broader implications for sustainable practices across the agricultural sector. The findings underscore the importance of renewable energy integration, feed optimization, and efficient waste management in mitigating the environmental impact of agriculture, thereby informing both policy and practice in the pursuit of carbon-neutral food production.
References
Nunes, L. J. R., The Rising Threat of Atmospheric CO2: A Review on the Causes, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies. Environments. 10(4) (2023) 1-22, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10040066.
Wang, Y., Hu, J., Huang, L., Li, T., Yue, X., Xie, X., Liao, H., Chen, K. and Wang, M., Projecting future health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone in China under different climate scenarios. Environment International. 169 (2022) 1-8, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107542.
Hussain, M. T. and Baig, M. A., Human Resource Management by Machine Learning Algorithms. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology. 10(11) (2022) 629–632, doi: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.46376.
Makarenkov, D.A. and Tsedilin, A.N., Greenhouse Gases as a Global Environmental Challenge at the Stage of Transition to a New Technological Order. Engineering Proceedings. 56(1) (2023) 276, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/asec2023-15284.
Akamati, K., Laliotis, G. P. and Bizelis, I., Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the Poultry Sector in Greece and Mitigation Potential Strategies. Gases. 3(1) (2023) 47–56, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/gases3010003.
Kidd, M. T. and Loar, R. E., A synopsis of recent work on the amino acid nutrition of layers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 30(1) (2021) 1-7, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2020.10.007.
Copley, M. A., Wiedemann, S. G. and McGahan, E., Environmental impacts of the Australian poultry industry. 2. Egg production. Animal Production Science. 63(5) (2023) 505–521, dol: https://doi.org/10.1071/an22297.
Keeratiurai P., Thanee N., and Vichairattanatragul P., Assessment of the carbon massflow from the layer farming with life cycle inventory. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 8(9) (2013) 673-682.
Cui, Y., Theo, E., Gurler, T., Su, Y. and Saffa, R., A comprehensive review on renewable and sustainable heating systems for poultry farming. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies. 15(1) (2019) 121–142, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctz048.
Türkboyları, E. Y. and Yuksel, A. N., Meeting the Energy Needs of Poultry Houses with Wind Turbine System under Tekirdağ Conditions and Its Environmental Effects. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 7(3) (2024) 594–600, doi: https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1451683.
Sleem, S. T., Salam, D. A., Ghaddar, N., Ghali, K. A., Chehab, G., Daghir, N. J., Doughan, Y. and Haddad, N., Solar-assisted poultry production in small-scale farms: a case study in the Bekaa semi-arid region, Lebanon. Energy Sustainability and Society. 14 (2024) 1-14, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00437-w.
Hamidinasab, B., Javadikia, H., Hosseini-Fashami, F., Kouchaki-Penchah, H. and Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Illuminating sustainability: A comprehensive review of the environmental life cycle and exergetic impacts of solar systems on the agri-food sector. Solar Energy. 262 (2023) 111830, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.111830.
Reijnders, L. Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Springer International Publishing, 2016.
Grassauer, F., Arulnathan, V. and Pelletier, N., Towards a net-zero greenhouse gas emission egg industry: A review of relevant mitigation technologies and strategies, current emission reduction potential, and future research needs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 181 (2023) 1-15, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113322.
Maciel, F. d. F., Gates, R. S., Tinôco, I. d. F. F., Sousa, F. C. d., Pelletier, N., Ibarburu-Blanc, M. A. and Oliveira, C. E. A., Life Cycle Assessment Project for the Brazilian Egg Industry. Animals. 13(9) (2023) 1-17, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091479.
Guillaume, A., Hubatová-Vacková, A. and Kočí, V., Environmental Impacts of Egg Production from a Life Cycle Perspective. Agriculture. 12(3) (2022) 1-16, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12030355.
Curran, M. A. Overview of goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment. Springer, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0855-3_1.
Mercante, I.T., Bovea, M.D., Ibáñez-Forés, V. and Arena, A.P., Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management systems: a Spanish case study. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 17 (2012) 232-241, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0350-2.
Hauschild, M. Z., Rosenbaum, R. K. and Olsen, S. I. Life Cycle Assessment : Theory and Practice. Springer International Publishing AG, Switzerland, 2018.
Usubharatana, P. and Phungrassami, H., Greenhouse Gas Emissions of One-Day-Old Chick Production. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 26(3) (2017) 1269–1277, doi: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/68156.
Kassab, N. and Fouda, T., Carbon footprint estimation in closed breeders' farms. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 23(1) (2023) 311-318.
He, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Vries, W. d., Ros, G. H., Oenema, O., Xu, W., Hou, Y., Wang, H. and Zhang, F., Mitigation of nitrogen losses and greenhouse gas emissions in a more circular cropping-poultry production system. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 189 (2022) 106739, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106739.
Boggia, A., Paolotti, L. and Castellini, C., Environmental impact evaluation of conventional, organic and organic-plus poultry production systems using life cycle assessment. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 66(1) (2010) 95–114, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043933910000103.
Balode, L., Pakere, I. and Blumberga, D., Organic or Non-organic Agriculture: Comparison of Organic and Conventional Farming Sustainability. in CONECT International Scientific Conference of Environmental and Climate Technologies. (2024), 91, doi: https://doi.org/10.7250/conect.2024.065.
Toro-Mújica, P. and González-Ronquillo, M., Editorial: Feeding and Nutritional Strategies to Reduce Livestock Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 8 (2021) 1-3, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.717426.
Sugiharto, S., Feeding Fermented Agricultural Byproducts as a Potential Approach to Reduce Carbon Footprint from Broiler Production – A Brief Overview. Reviews in Agricultural Science. 10 (2022) 90–100, doi: https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.10.0_90.
Chojnacka, K., Mikula, K., Izydorczyk, G., Skrzypczak, D., Witek‐Krowiak, A., Gersz, A., Μουστάκας, Κ., Iwaniuk, J., Grzędzicki, M. and Korczyński, M., Innovative high digestibility protein feed materials reducing environmental impact through improved nitrogen-use efficiency in sustainable agriculture. Journal of Environmental Management. 291 (2021) 1-11, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112693.
Grassauer, F., Arulnathan, V. and Pelletier, N., Towards a net-zero greenhouse gas emission egg industry: A review of relevant mitigation technologies and strategies, current emission reduction potential, and future research needs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 181 (2023) 1-15, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113322.
Yan, X., Ying, Y., Li, K., Zhang, Q. and Wang, K., A review of mitigation technologies and management strategies for greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions in livestock production. Journal of Environmental Management. 352 (2024) 1-12, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120028.
Li, M.-H., Li, S., Meng, Q., Chen, S., Wang, J., Guo, X., Ding, F. and Shi, L. Feedstock optimization with rice husk chicken manure and mature compost during chicken manure composting: Quality and gaseous emissions. Bioresource Technology. 387 (2023) 1-9, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129694.
Peng, S., Li, H., Xu, Q., Lin, X. and Wang, Y., Addition of zeolite and superphosphate to windrow composting of chicken manure improves fertilizer efficiency and reduces greenhouse gas emission. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(36) (2019) 36845–36856, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06544-6
Hwang, H. Y., Kim, S. H., Kim, M. S., Park, S. J. and Lee, C.-H., Co-composting of chicken manure with organic wastes: characterization of gases emissions and compost quality. Applied Biological Chemistry. 63 (2020) 1-10, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-019-0483-8
Kumar, M. and Sharma, M. P., Selection of potential oils for biodiesel production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 56 (2016) 1129–1138, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.032.
Hanaki, K. and Portugal-Pereira, J. Biofuels and sustainability: holistic perspectives for policy-making. Springer Japan KK, 2018.
Hosseini-Fashami, F., Motevali, A., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Hashemi, S. J. and Chau, K. W., Energy-Life cycle assessment on applying solar technologies for greenhouse strawberry production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 116 (2019) 109411, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109411.
Mantri, S. R., Kasibhatla, R. S. and Chennapragada, V. K. B., Grid-connected vs. off-grid solar water pumping systems for agriculture in India: A comparative study. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 46(1) (2024) 6348-6362, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1745957.
Zhao, Y., Zhu, Y., Cheng, H. W., Zheng, R., Meng, D. and Yang, Y. A review on semitransparent solar cells for agricultural application. Materials Today Energy. 22 (2021) 100852, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100852.
Ubolsook, P., Kongnun, W., Jansanthea, P. and Aimyuak, Y. Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Water Pumping Systems in Small Agriculture and Approach to Reduce Environmental Impacts. in the 16th Thailand Renewable Energy for Community Conference. (2023), 107-114.
Aliyu, M., Hassan, G., Said, S. A. M., Siddiqui, M. U., Al‐Awami, A. T. and El‐Amin, I., A review of solar-powered water pumping systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 87 (2018) 61–76, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.010.
Sama-apat, P. and Ruengrungchaikun, T., An economic assessment of solar water pumping systems for agriculture. Thai Journal of Science and Technology. 4(3) (2015) 217-226, doi: https://doi.org/10.14456/tjst.2015.6.
Jawjit, W. and Jawjit, S., Life cycle greenhouse gases emissions of processed frozen chicken. Journal of Science and Technology. 28(9) (2019) 1642-1654, doi: https://doi.org/10.14456/tstj.2020.131.
Shepherd, T. A., Zhao, Y., Li, H., Stinn, J. P., Hayes, M. D., and Xin, H., Environmental assessment of three egg production systems — Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions. Poultry Science. 94(3) (2015) 534–543, doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/peu075.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 School of Renewable Energy and Smart Grid Technology (SGtech)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All copyrights of the above manuscript, including rights to publish in any media, are transferred to the SGtech.
The authors retain the following rights;
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright.
2. Re-use of all or part of the above manuscript in their work.
3. Reproduction of the above manuscript for author’s personal use or for company/institution use provided that
(a) prior permission of SGtech is obtained,
(b) the source and SGtech copyright notice are indicated, and
(c) the copies are not offered for sale.
