A Study of Factors Associated with Hospitals’ Compliance with COVID Free Setting Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand: A Case Study of Ministry of Public Health Hospitals

Main Article Content

Nawarat Apichainan
Rujira Chaiduang

Abstract

        Thailand adopted the COVID Free Setting (CFS) measures to control three major risk domains: environment, personnel, and customer during the global COVID-19pandemic. High-risk venues involving gatherings, such as hospitals, were required to conduct safety assessments. This survey research employed a multi - method data collection approach, which comprised a cross-sectional study to analyze factors associated with hospital compliance with COVID Free Setting (CFS) measures and to identify measures that could not be implemented. The qualitative component further examined the driving mechanisms behind the CFS measure through the PIRAB strategy to formulate future recommendations. Data were obtained from the self-assessment results of 9,276 hospitals under the Ministry of Public Health, collected via the Thai Stop COVID Plus digital platform. Statistical analyses included the Fisher’s Exact test to examine associations and cross-tabulation to describe frequency distributions.
        The results showed a statistically significant association (p<0.05) between hospital type and accreditation level under the GREEN and CLEAN Hospital Standard (GCH) with compliance with COVID Free Setting (CFS) measures. Hospital type was significantly associated with overall measures and all domains of compliance with CFS measures, while GCH accreditation was significantly associated with overall compliance, environment domain, and personnel domain, but showed no significant association with the customer domain. A small proportion of hospitals which were 0.2% of hospitals, reported difficulties in implementing daily staff screening, and 0.1% surface disinfection, and enforcement of Universal Prevention for COVID-19 and DMHTA, while 0.1% of large hospitals lacked adequate ventilation and 0.4% of small hospitals did not conduct pre-procedure COVID-19 testing before undertaking high-risk procedures. The Partnership Investment Regulation Advocacy and Building capacity (PIRAB) strategy was considered an appropriate mechanism to drive implementation for hospitals. It is suggested that the type of hospital and its ventilation systems should be considered when formulating measures, and CFS measures should be integrated into GCH standards.

Article Details

How to Cite
Apichainan, N., & Chaiduang , R. . (2025). A Study of Factors Associated with Hospitals’ Compliance with COVID Free Setting Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand: A Case Study of Ministry of Public Health Hospitals. Pathumthani Health Sciences Journal, 6(2), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.14456/phsj.2025.4
Section
Research Articles

References

กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. (2563). ประกาศกระทรวงสาธารณสุข เรื่อง หลักเกณฑ์ วิธีการ และมาตรการการป้องกันความเสี่ยงจากโรคติดเชื้อไวรัสโคโรนา 2019 (COVID-19) สำหรับสถานประกอบกิจการ พ.ศ. 2563. ราชกิจจานุเบกษา, 137 (ฉบับพิเศษ 81 ง). สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 พฤษภาคม 2568. เข้าถึงได้จาก https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2563/E/081

/T_0011.PDF

กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. (2565). สถานการณ์ โรคติดเชื้อไวรัสโคโรนา 2019 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ศูนย์บริหารสถานการณ์ โควิดขต (ศบค.) วันที่ 15 มีนาคม 2565. สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 พฤษภาคม 2568. เข้าถึงได้จาก https://media. thaigov.go.th/uploads/public img/source/150365.pdf

กรมอนามัย. (2564). DOH’s Report to the First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic: Thailand Experience. สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 พฤษภาคม 2568. เข้าถึงได้จาก https://shorturl.asia/tF0u6

กรมอนามัย. (2564). DOH’s Report to the 4th Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic: Thailand Experience. สืบค้นเมื่อ 17 พฤษภาคม 2568. เข้าถึงได้จาก https://shorturl.asia/62TLG

กรมควบคุมโรค. [ออนไลน์]. (2566). สถานการณ์โรคและภัยสุขภาพที่สำคัญ ระหว่างสัปดาห์การระบาดที่ 1-21ข้อมูล ณ วันที่ 4 มิถุนายน 2567. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 กรกฎาคม 2568. เข้าถึงได้จาก https://shorturl.asia/2y7uv

กรมควบคุมโรค. [ออนไลน์]. (2567). สถานการณ์โรคติดเชื้อไวรัสโคโรนา 2019 (COVID-19) ประเทศไทย ข้อมูล ณ วันที่ 15 กรกฎาคม 2567 สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 กรกฎาคม 2568. เข้าถึงได้จาก. https://shorturl.asia/YBo9O

กรมควบคุมโรค. [ออนไลน์]. (2568). สถานการณ์โรคติดเชื้อไวรัสโคโรนา 2019 (COVID-19) ประเทศไทย ข้อมูล ณ วันที่ 4 มิถุนายน 2568. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 กรกฎาคม 2568. เข้าถึงได้จาก Alert_covid_04.26.2568.pdf

Bellato V, Konishi T, Pellino G, An Y, Piciocchi A, Sensi B, Siragusa L, Khanna K, Pirozzi BM, Franceschilli M, Campanelli M, Efetov S, Sica GS, Carannante F, D’Ambrosio G, Zangrillo A, Spinelli A, Angelos P, Mayol J, et al. (2020). Screening policies, preventive measures and in-hospital infection of COVID-19 in global surgical practices. Journal of Global Health. 10(2), 020507. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.10.020507

Habibi R, Eccleston-Turner M & Burci GL. (2025). The 2024 Amendments to the International Health Regulations: A New Era for Global Health Law in Pandemic Preparedness and Response?. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 53(S1): 47-50. doi:10.1017/jme.2025.16.

Kaine G., Greenhalgh S., & Wright V. (2022). Compliance with COVID-19 measures: Evidence from

McMichael TM, Currie DW, Clark S, Pogosjans S, Kay M, Schwartz NG, Lewis J, Baer A, Kawakami V, Lukoff MD, Ferro J, Brostrom-Smith C, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Riedo FX, Russell D, Hiatt B, Montgomery P, Rao AK, et al. (2020). Epidemiology of Covid-19 in a long-term care facility in King County, Washington. The New England Journal of Medicine. 382(21), 2005–2011. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2005412

Moothadeth A, Waqar S, Ghouri N, Iqbal Z, Alam J, Ahmed S, Abbas SZ. (2020). Fasting during Ramadan and the COVID 19 pandemic. Occupational Medicine. 70(5), 306–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaa103

New Zealand. PLOS ONE. 17(2), e0263376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263376

Nguyen LH, Drew DA, Graham MS, Joshi AD, Guo CG, Ma W, Mehta RS, Warner ET, Sikavi DR, Lo CH, Kwon S, Song M, Mucci LA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Eliassen AH, Hart JE, Chavarro JE, Rich Edwards JW, et al. (2020). Risk of COVID 19 among front line health care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Public Health. 5(9), e475 e483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468 2667(20)30164 X

Ran L, Chen X, Wang Y, Wu W, Zhang L, Tan X. (2020). Risk factors of healthcare workers with coronavirus disease 2019: A retrospective cohort study in a designated hospital of Wuhan in China. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 71(16), 2218–2221. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa287

Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 35(3), 293–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100440

Shao S, Zhou D, He R, Li J, Zou S, Mallery K, Kumar S, Yang S, Hong J. (2021). Risk assessment of airborne transmission of COVID 19 by asymptomatic individuals under different practical settings. Journal of Aerosol Science, 151, 105661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105661

Thomas A, & Suresh M. (2021). Economic impact of COVID-19 on hospitals. Best Practice &

Waroonkun, T., & Prugsiganont, S. (2022). Preventing the spread of COVID 19 through environmental design in Thai community hospitals. Frontiers in Built Environment. 8, 947211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.947211

World Health Organization. .[Online]. (2022). COVID-19 situation updates for week 52 (25–31 December 2022). Retrieved (2025, 10 May) Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/ajH1W

World Health Organization.[Online]. (2020). WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. Retrieved (2025, 10 May) Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/1HLIp