THE EFFECTS OF CONCEPT ATTAINMENT MODEL WITH THINK WRITE PAIR SHARE TECHNIQUE ON MATHEMATICAL CONCEPT AND REASONING ABILITY OF MATHAYOMSUKSA II STUDENTSTHE EFFECTS OF CONCEPT ATTAINMENT MODEL WITH THINK WRITE PAIR SHARE TECHNIQUE ON MATHEMATICAL CONCEPT AND REASONING ABILITY OF MATHAYOMSUKSA II STUDENTS

Main Article Content

Vetcharit Angganapattarakajorn
Dujjit Kunakoonwisan
Paladorn Suwannapho

Abstract

A study of the effects of Concept Attainment model with Think Write Pair Share technique on mathematical concept and reasoning ability of Mathayomsuksa II students, the authors used the One – shot case study design research model, which randomly selects a single sample group.  The authors used the selected sample group with Concept Attainment model with Think Write Pair Share technique. The raw data was analyzed into an average score then using the analyzed average score to answer the research hypothesis. The sample was 45 Mathayomsuksa 2/4 students who were studying basic mathematics subject in second semester of 2021 school year at Phanatpittayakarn School. They were selected by cluster random sampling. The research instruments used in this research consisted of six lesson plans using Concept Attainment model with Think Write Pair Share technique on Congruence with the suitability of the average learning lesson plan of 4.79 and standard deviation of 0.30. Mathematical concept test six items on Congruence with Index of Item-Objective Congruence
is between 0.80-1.00, Difficulty is between 0.45-0.65, Discrimination is between 0.37-0.65 and reliability of 0.72. Mathematical reasoning ability test six items on Congruence with Index of  Item-Objective Congruence
is between 0.80-1.00, Difficulty is between 0.53-0.72, Discrimination is between 0.37-0.65 and reliability of 0.78. Statistics used for analyzing the data collection were mean, percentage, standard deviation, and t-test for one sample. Research results found that Mathematical concept on Congruence after using Concept Attainment model with Think Write Pair Share technique is higher than the criterion of 70 percent at .05 level of significance and Mathematical reasoning ability on Congruence after using Concept Attainment model with Think Write Pair Share technique is higher than the criterion of 70 percent at .05 level of significance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Angganapattarakajorn, V., Kunakoonwisan, D., & Suwannapho, P. (2022). THE EFFECTS OF CONCEPT ATTAINMENT MODEL WITH THINK WRITE PAIR SHARE TECHNIQUE ON MATHEMATICAL CONCEPT AND REASONING ABILITY OF MATHAYOMSUKSA II STUDENTSTHE EFFECTS OF CONCEPT ATTAINMENT MODEL WITH THINK WRITE PAIR SHARE TECHNIQUE ON MATHEMATICAL CONCEPT AND REASONING ABILITY OF MATHAYOMSUKSA II STUDENTS. Journal of Industrial Education, 21(2), 10–21. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JIE/article/view/247939
Section
Research Articles

References

Academy of Art University. (2010). Think-write-pair-share. http://faculty.academyart.edu/faculty/teaching- resources/NewFacultyResources/ThinkWritePairShare.html

Angganapattarakajorn, V. (2011). Math skills and processes. Burapha University. (in Thai)

Angganapattarakajorn, V. (2012). Complete of the matters should be known for mathematics teachers on curriculum, teaching and research. Burapha University. (in Thai)

Angganapattarakajorn, V. (2014). A Study of Mathematics Concepts about Statistic of Students’ Mathematics Major Undergraduate Faculty of Education Burapha University. Burapha University. (in Thai)

Arends, R. (2015). Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Bass, B., & Thetford, A. (2014). The (not so) little Itty Bitty book of the C.I.F.: 155 Ways to make it happen! ways to make it happen! https://www.ruskisd.net/uploaded/Rusk_ISD/Departments/Curriculum_and_Instruction/Not_So_Itty_Bitty_Book_of_the_CIF.pdf

Bifield, J. (2020). Think, write, pair, share. https://ealdaylight.com/think-write-pair-share/

Boonmark, S. (2015). The effects of concept attainment model on mathematical concept and reasoning ability in parallel lines of Mathayomsuksa II Students [Master’s thesis]. Burapha University. (in Thai)

Bumrerraj, N. (2002). Conceptual learning activities. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, Burapha University, 1(1), 8-25. (in Thai)

Chamnankit, N. (2001). The development of a model to create teaching competency on geometric concept image for pre-service teachers. [Doctoral dissertation]. Srinakharinwirot University. (in Thai)

Ferlazzo, L. (2011). Helping students motivate themselves practical answers to classroom challenges. Routledge.

Gunter, M. A., Estes, T. H., & Schwab, J. (2007). Instruction: A model approach. Allyn and Bacon.

Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2004). Mathematical reasoning in primary school. S.P.N Printing. (in Thai)

Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2012). Mathematical skills and processes (3rd ed). 3-Q Media. (in Thai)

Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2015). TIMSS 2015 project research report. http://timssthailand.ipst.ac.th/timss/reports/timss2015report (in Thai)

Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (9th ed). Pearson Education.

Lesley, T. J., Matczynski, T. J., & Rowley, J. B. (2002). Instructional models: Strategies for teaching in a diverse society (2nd ed). Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Lim, J. (2009). The effectiveness of paired engagement routines in raising student achievement. https://www.scholastic.com/content/dam/teachers/blogs/justin-lim/migrated-files/lim-prospectus-and-bio-2.pdf

Literacy Minnesota. (2017, August). Think, write, pair, share. https://www.literacymn.org/think-write-pair-share

Makanong, A. (2010). Mathematical skills and processes: Development of development. Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)

Makanong, A. (2015). Mathematics for secondary teachers (2nd ed). Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)

Mansanguan, S. (2013). Mathematics teaching behavior 2. Ramkhamhaeng University. (in Thai)

Ministry of Education. (2003). Mathematics learning in Mathayomsuksa 1-6 according to Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2544 (A.D. 2001). Express Transportation Organization of Thailand. (in Thai)

Ministry of Education. (2008). The Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand. (in Thai)

Ministry of Education. (2017). Learning Standards and Indicators in Mathematics education (Revised A.D. 2017) according to Basic

Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand. (in Thai)

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (2012). Think-write-pair-share. https://www.

nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/4-TWPS_Template.pdf

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2010). Guidelines for measuring and evaluating learning outcomes According to the core curriculum of basic education, B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand. (in Thai)

Phanatpittayakarn School. (2020). Results of the Ordinary National Education Test (O-NET) academic year 2020. Phanatpittayakarn School. (in Thai)

Star, J. R., Caronongan, P., Foegen, A., Furgeson, J., Keating, B., Larson, M. R., Lyskawa, J., McCallum, W. G., Porath, J., & Zbiek, R. M. (2015). Teaching strategies for improving algebra knowledge in middle and high school students (NCEE 2014-4333). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://lib.dr.iastate. edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=edu_books

Suhartoyo, E., Mukminatien, N., & Laksmi, E. D. (2015). The effect of Toulmin’s model of argumentation within TWPS strategy on students’ critical thinking on argumentative essay. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 3(2), 143-153.

Tesdee, C. (2014). Effects of instructional model on concept attainment in mathematics on “SET” of the Tenth Grade Students [Doctoral dissertation]. Burapha University. (In Thai)

Ummah, R., & Fiqry, R. (2021). Pengaruh Penggunaan Pembelajaran Think Write Pair Shaire (TWPS) Berbantuan LMS terhadap Hasil dan Minat Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 7(2), 159–166.

Wonganutrohd, P. (2003). Educational psychology. Bangkok Media Center. (in Thai)