Comparative analysis of steady and unsteady friction models in numerical simulation of water hammer phenomenon
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study presents comparative numerical modeling using the method of characteristics to solve the water hammer phenomenon in a pipeline that consists of reservoir-pipe-valve systems resulting from an instantaneous valve closure. Study focused on the unsteady friction approach, the two-coefficient instantaneous acceleration-based unsteady friction model (2-k IAB), which describes the transient flow behavior in pipeline systems during rapid velocity changes that result in water hammer events. Also, the methodology includes developing a mathematical model based on the numerical simulation of the governing equations using the proposed models and validating the model results by utilizing six sets of experimental data from two different laboratory sources. The study compares the performance of steady and unsteady friction models and reveals the limitations and advantages of each in simulating pressure waves resulting from the water hammer. The study also discusses the basic criteria for selecting values when using the average wave speed for experimental data. Numerical results show that the best model and the most consistent with experimental data is the 2-k IAB model, followed by the one-coefficient instantaneous acceleration-based model (1-k IAB), and finally, the least accurate model is the steady friction model. This was validated by using the statistical method Normalized Root Mean Squared Error. The methodology presented in this paper can be a valuable tool for analyzing and designing pipeline systems subjected to the water hammer phenomenon. It provides insights into transient flow characteristics resulting from instantaneous valve closure and helps determine the appropriate mitigation measures to prevent pipeline system damage.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Urbanowicz K, Bergant A, Stosiak M, Towarnicki K. Analytical solutions of water hammer in metal pipes. Part II—Comparative study. In: Lesiuk G, Duda S, Correia JAFO, De Jesus AMP, editors. Fatigue and Fracture of Materials and Structures. Structural Integrity, vol 24. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 69-83.
Henclik S. Analytical solution and numerical study on water hammer in a pipeline closed with an elastically attached valve. J Sound Vib. 2018;417:245-59.
EL-Turki A. Modeling of hydraulic transients in closed conduits [thesis]. Fort Collins: Colorado State University; 2013.
Urbanowicz K, Bergant A, Stosiak M, Karpenko M, Bogdevičius M. Developments in analytical wall shear stress modelling for water hammer phenomena. J Sound Vib. 2023;562:117848.
Urbanowicz K, Jing H, Bergant A, Stosiak M, Lubecki M. Progress in analytical modeling of water hammer. J Fluids Eng. 2023;145(8):081203.
Joukowsky N. Über den hydraulischen Stoss in Wasserleitungsrohren. Saint Petersburg: The Imperial Academy of Science; 1900. (In German)
Ghidaoui MS, Zhao M, McInnis DA, Axworthy DH. A review of water hammer theory and practice. Appl Mech Rev. 2005;58(1):49-76.
Abdeldayem OM, Ferràs D, van der Zwan S, Kennedy M. Analysis of unsteady friction models used in engineering software for water hammer analysis: Implementation case in Wanda. Water. 2021;13(4):495.
Chaudhry MH. Applied hydraulic transients. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2014.
Bhattacharyya EM, Saikia MD, Das MM. Development of numerical model for transients in pipe flow for water hammer situation and comparison of different friction equations for transient friction. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2018;5(3):2995-3001.
Yu C, Yu X, Zhang L, Neupane B, Zhang J. Approximate approach for improving pressure attenuation accuracy during hydraulic transients. Water Supply. 2022;22(3):3387-98.
Khilqa S, Elkholy M, Al-Tofan M, Caicedo JM, Chaudhry MH. Damping in transient pressurized flows. J Hydraul Eng. 2019;145(10):04019034.
Kjerrumgaard Jensen R, Kær Larsen J, Lindgren Lassen K, Mandø M, Andreasen A. Implementation and validation of a free open source 1d water hammer code. Fluids. 2018;3(3):64.
Prashanth Reddy H, Silva-Araya WF, Hanif Chaudhry M. Estimation of decay coefficients for unsteady friction for instantaneous, acceleration-based models. J Hydraul Eng. 2012;138(3):260-71.
Storli PT, Nielsen TK. Transient friction in pressurized pipes. II: two-coefficient instantaneous acceleration–based model. J Hydraul Eng. 2011;137(6):679-95.
Urbanowicz K, Bergant A, Stosiak M, Deptuła A, Karpenko M, Kubrak M, et al. Water hammer simulation using simplified convolution-based unsteady friction model. Water. 2022;14(19):3151.
Shamloo H, Norooz R, Mousavifard M. A review of one-dimensional unsteady friction models for transient pipe flow. Cumhuriyet Science Journal. 2015;36(3):2278-88.
al-Yassiri HM, Ali KH, Jalil JM. Three-dimensional numerical study of flow characteristics through a centrifugal pump. Al-Rafidain Eng J. 2008;16(1):75-88.
Zhang B, Wan W, Shi M. Experimental and numerical simulation of water hammer in gravitational pipe flow with continuous air entrainment. Water. 2018;10(7):928.
Arefi MH, Ghaeini-Hessaroeyeh M, Memarzadeh R. Numerical modeling of water hammer in long water transmission pipeline. Appl Water Sci. 2021;11(8):140.
Duan X, Zhu J, Li X, Tang X. Comprehensive application analyses of elastic models and viscoelastic models in transient flows in polymeric pipelines. J Hydroinformatics. 2022;24(5):1020-52.
Cao Z, Wang Z, Deng J, Guo X, Lu L. Unsteady friction model modified with compression-expansion effects in transient pipe flow. Aqua Water Infrastruct Ecosyst Soc. 2022;71(2):330-44.
Jensen RK, Larsen JK, Lassen KL. Modelling of a two phase water hammer [thesis]. Esbjerg: Aalborg University Esbjerg; 2018.
Pal S, Hanmaiahgari PR, Karney BW. An overview of the numerical approaches to water hammer modelling: the ongoing quest for practical and accurate numerical approaches. Water. 2021;13(11):1597.
Adamkowski A, Lewandowski M. Experimental examination of unsteady friction models for transient pipe flow simulation. J Fluids Eng. 2006;128(6):1351-63.
Mohsin ZZ, Sulaiman ZA. Application of the method of characteristics with unsteady friction model for numerical modeling of transient flow induced by valve closure. Al-Rafidain Eng J. 2023;28(2):209-25.