Removal of dissolved organic matter in sugar mill effluent by catalytic ozonation with activated carbon (O3/GAC)

Main Article Content

Sattawat Thuangchon
Pattakamol Somboot
Phanwatt Phungsai
Thunyalux Ratpukdi

Abstract

This study investigated removals of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in natural surface water mixed effluent (NW-EFF) of sugar mill factory using O3, granular activated carbon (GAC) and O3/GAC as catalytic ozonation. Effects of O3 flowrate and GAC dose on reductions of DOC and ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (UV254) were examined. The DOC removals by O3/GAC were the most efficient (85.5% – 88.0%), while those of O3 and GAC were 41.2% – 61.7% and 0.6% – 14.2%, respectively. The UV254 removals by O3/GAC were 99.8%–99.9%, while those of O3 and GAC were 92.7% – 97.2% and 4.9% – 28.5%, respectively. In O3 experiment, the increases of ozone flowrate decreased the DOC removal. In O3/GAC, during the first 60-min reaction time, the DOC removals by GAC doses of 0.1 g/L and 1.0 g/L were about the same drastic reductions of DOC observed at GAC dose of 2.5 g/L. After 60-min reaction time, the DOC concentrations gradually decreased at the same rate towards the end of the experiment for all GAC doses. The O3/GAC reduced approximately 50% of specific ozone consumption compared to the O3 alone for the same DOC removal. The enhancement factors (R) of all GAC doses are greater than 1.0 indicated that GAC doses have synergistic effects on the removal of DOC in NW-EFF. The O3/GAC reduced the electrical energy per order (EEO) approximately 30% – 55% of those by the O3 process. The present study shows that the O3/GAC is suitable for treatment of NW-EFF of sugar mill factory due to DOC removal and energy efficiencies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thuangchon, S. ., Somboot, P. ., Phungsai, P. ., & Ratpukdi, T. . (2021). Removal of dissolved organic matter in sugar mill effluent by catalytic ozonation with activated carbon (O3/GAC). Engineering and Applied Science Research, 48(6), 740–746. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/easr/article/view/244865
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

References

[1] Matilainen A, Vepsalainen M, Sillanpaa M. Natural organic matter removal by coagulation during drinking water treatment: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2010;159(2):189-97.

[2] Filloux E, Labanowski J, Croue JP. Understanding the fouling of UF/MF hollow fibres of biologically treated wastewaters using advanced EfOM characterization and statistical tools. Bioresour Tech. 2012;118:460-8.

[3] Ghuge SP, Saroha AK. Catalytic ozonation for the treatment of synthetic and industrial effluents-application of mesoporous materials: a review. J Environ Manag. 2018;211:83-102.

[4] Sriramoju SK, Dash PS, Majumdar S. Meso-porous activated carbon from lignite waste and its application in methylene blue adsorption and coke plant effluent treatment. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(1):104784.

[5] Singh RK, Mishra SK, Velramar B, Kumar PR. Development of biologically-based activated carbon for advanced water and wastewater treatment process. In: Pandey VC, Singh V, edtiors. Bioremediation of Pollutants. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2020. p. 215-25.

[6] Chunjian Y, Liu R, Li X, Song Y, Gao H. Degradation of dissolved organic matter in effluent of municipal wastewater plant by a combined tidal and subsurface flow constructed wetland. J Environ Sci. 2021;106(2):171-81.

[7] Gnowe WD, Noubissie E, Noumi GB. Influence of time and oxygenation on the degradation of organic matter, nitrogen and phosphates during the biological treatment of slaughterhouse effluent. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng. 2020;2(4679):100048.

[8] Wang Y, Gao Y, Ye T, Hu Y, Yang C. Dynamic variations of dissolved organic matter from treated wastewater effluent in the receiving water: photo-and bio-degradation kinetics and its environmental implications. Environ Res. 2021;194:110709.

[9] Kim HC, Dempsey BA. Effects of wastewater effluent organic materials on fouling in ultrafiltration. Water Res. 2008;42(13):3379-84.

[10] Shang W, Li M, Chen L, Sun F, Dong W, An AK, et al. A fluorescence-based indicator for nanofiltration fouling propensity caused by effluent organic matter (EfOM). Process Biochem. 2020;91:260-70.

[11] Dayarathne HNP, Angove MJ, Aryal R, Abuel-Naga H, Mainali B. Removal of natural organic matter from source water: review on coagulants, dual coagulation, alternative coagulants, and mechanisms. J Water Process Eng. 2020;40:101820.

[12] Li C, Wang D, Xu X, Wang Z. Formation of known and unknown disinfection by-products from natural organic matter fractions during chlorination, chloramination, and ozonation. Sci Total Environ. 2017;587-588:177-84.

[13] Zhang Y, An Y, Liu C, Wang Y, Song Z, Li Y, et al. Catalytic ozonation of emerging pollutant and reduction of toxic by-products in secondary effluent matrix and effluent organic matter reaction activity. Water Res. 2019;166:115026.

[14] Miklos DB, Remy C, Jekel M, Linden KG, Drewes JE, Hubner U. Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment-a critical review. Water Res. 2018;139:118-31.

[15] Cruz-Alcalde A, Esplugas S, Sans C. Characterization and fate of EfOM during ozonation applied for effective abatement of recalcitrant micropollutants. Sep Purif Tech. 2020;237:116468.

[16] Wang WL, Hu HY, Liu X, Shi HX, Zhou TH, Wang C, et al. Combination of catalytic ozonation by regenerated granular activated carbon (rGAC) and biological activated carbon in the advanced treatment of textile wastewater for reclamation. Chemosphere. 2019;231:369-77.

[17] Xiong W, Cui W, Li R, Feng C, Liu Y, Ningping M, et al. Mineralization of phenol by ozone combined with activated carbon: performance and mechanism under different pH levels. Environ Sci Ecotechnology. 2020;1:100005.

[18] Vatankhah H, Riley SM, Murray C, Quinones O, Steirer KX, Dickenson E, et al. Simultaneous ozone and granular activated carbon for advanced treatment of micropollutants in municipal wastewater effluent. Chemosphere. 2019;234:845-54.

[19] Ghuge SP, Saroha AK. Catalytic ozonation for the treatment of synthetic and industrial effluents-application of mesoporous materials: a review. J Environ Manag. 2018;211:83-102.

[20] Guzman-Perez CA, Soltan J, Robertson J. Kinetics of catalytic ozonation of atrazine in the presence of activated carbon. Sep Purif Tech. 2011;79(1):8-14.

[21] Gumus D, Akbal F. A comparative study of ozonation, iron coated zeolite catalyzed ozonation and granular activated carbon catalyzed ozonation of humic acid. Chemosphere. 2017;174:218-31.

[22] USEPA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington: American Water Works Association; 2012.

[23] Gottschalk C, Libra JA, Saupe A. Ozonation of water and waste water: a practical guide to understanding ozone and its applications. 2nd ed. Germany: Wiley; 2009.

[24] Hadavifar M, Younesi H, Zinatizadeh AA, Mahdad F, Li Q, Ghasemi Z. Application of integrated ozone and granular activated carbon for decolorization and chemical oxygen demand reduction of vinasse from alcohol distilleries. J Environ Manag. 2016;170:28-36.

[25] Zhang X, Lin J, Ye W, Zhou W, Jia X, Zhao S, et al. Potential of coagulation/GAC adsorption combined with UV/H 2 O 2 and ozonation for removing dissolved organic matter from secondary RO concentrate. J Chem Tech Biotech. 2019;94(4):1091-9.

[26] Liu ZQ, Huang C, Li JY, Yang J, Qu B, Yang SQ, et al. Activated carbon catalytic ozonation of reverse osmosis concentrate after coagulation pretreatment from coal gasification wastewater reclamation for zero liquid discharge. J Clean Prod. 2020;286:124951.

[27] Liu ZQ, You L, Xiong X, Wang Q, Yan Y, Tu J, et al. Potential of the integration of coagulation and ozonation as a pretreatment of reverse osmosis concentrate from coal gasification wastewater reclamation. Chemosphere. 2019;222:696-704.

[28] Alvarez PM, Pocostales JP, Beltran FJ. Granular activated carbon promoted ozonation of a food-processing secondary effluent. J Hazard Mater. 2011;185(2-3):776-83.

[29] Bai Z, Yang Q, Wang J. Catalytic ozonation of sulfamethazine using Ce0.1Fe0.9OOH as catalyst: mineralization and catalytic mechanisms. Chem Eng J. 2016;300:169-76.

[30] Xing L, Xie Y, Cao H, Minakata D, Zhang Y, Crittenden JC. Activated carbon-enhanced ozonation of oxalate attributed to HO oxidation in bulk solution and surface oxidation: effects of the type and number of basic sites. Chem Eng J. 2014;245:71-9.

[31] Wang WL, Hu HY, Liu X, Shi HX, Zhou TH, Wang C, et al. Combination of catalytic ozonation by regenerated granular activated carbon (rGAC) and biological activated carbon in the advanced treatment of textile wastewater for reclamation. Chemosphere. 2019;231:369-77.

[32] Gul S, Ozcan O, Erbatur O. Ozonation of C.I. reactive red 194 and C.I. reactive yellow 145 in aqueous solution in the presence of granular activated carbon. Dye Pigment. 2007;75(2):426-31.

[33] Lee Y, Von Gunten U. Advances in predicting organic contaminant abatement during ozonation of municipal wastewater effluent: reaction kinetics, transformation products, and changes of biological effects. Environ Sci Water Res Tech. 2016;2(3):421-42.

[34] Liu Y, Jiang J, Ma J, Yang Y, Luo C, Huangfu X, et al. Role of the propagation reactions on the hydroxyl radical formation in ozonation and peroxone (ozone/hydrogen peroxide) processes. Water Res. 2015;68:750-8.

[35] von Sonntag C, von Gunten U. Chemistry of ozone in water and wastewater treatmentnull. London: IWA Publishing; 2012.