Geospatial modelling of land use/land cover dynamics in the Gongola basin for water resource applications through CA-Markov

Main Article Content

AbdulRazaq Salaudeen
Abubakar Ismail
Babatunde K. Adeogun
Morufu A. Ajibike
Musa Sulaiman Ibrahim

Abstract

The Gongola basin has witnessed tremendous environmental changes over the last three decades as a direct consequence of urban growth, deforestation (including encroachment of existing forest reserves), agricultural expansion, overgrazing, bush burning, drought and recurrent flooding episodes. The impact of these changes is influential on the basin’s hydrology, water resource and ecological process, yet, future land cover information to evaluate possible implications on its hydrology and the overall ecosystem is non-existence. Consequently, this study attempts to simulate future land cover demands of 2028 and 2038 for the basin, based on land cover images of 1988, 2003 and 2018 to develop land use/landcover (LU/LC) scenarios for possible hydrologic impact assessments. The method of the research therefore, premised on the use of cellular automata and Markov chain (CA-Markov) model, driven by a number of factors and constraints. Results indicate the land cover change to be mainly driven by rapid growth in urban and agricultural lands, contrary to the vegetation cover, which had been the dominant land cover type in the past. Besides, during the 30 years period, there were noticeable 37.05, 20.21 and 11.55 % increase in urban built-up, bare surface and agricultural land respectively, at the detriment of natural vegetation, which has itself decreased by 18.78 % over the period, with an estimated annual loss of approximately 330 km2 of natural vegetation. The decrease in the coverage area of water body was significant (3.55 %) for the same period. Findings from future simulations of LU/LC trends in the basin, show that urban area would have increased by 39 % and agriculture by 34 % by 2028 relative to the baseline period of 2003. Conversely, the natural vegetation trailed a declining trend (39 %) higher in magnitude than the preceding years. The developed LU/LC scenarios for the basin can provide an opportunity for water resource managers and experts to understand the trends in changing land use for effective planning and management.

Article Details

How to Cite
Salaudeen, A., Ismail, A. ., Adeogun, B. K., Ajibike, M. A., & Ibrahim, M. S. . (2021). Geospatial modelling of land use/land cover dynamics in the Gongola basin for water resource applications through CA-Markov. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 48(4), 476–486. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/easr/article/view/242491
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

References

Brink AB, Eva HD. Monitoring 25 years of land cover change dynamics in Africa: a sample-based remote sensing approach. Appl Geogr. 2009;29:501-12.

Mbaya LA, Hashidu MS. Status of forest reserves (savannah woodland) biodiversity and rural livelihoods in Gombe state. Int J Dev Sustain. 2017;6:2173-92.

Adnan NA, Atkinson PM, Yusoff ZM, Rasam ARA. Climate variability and anthropogenic impacts on a semi-distributed monsoon catchment runoff simulations. 2014 IEEE 10th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications; 2014 Mar 7-9; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. USA: IEEE; 2014. p. 1-6.

Basarudin Z, Adnan NA, Latif ARA, Tahir W, Syafiqah N. Event-based rainfall-runoff modelling of the Kelantan river basin. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2014;(18):1-6.

Wu F, Zhan J, Su H, Yan H, Ma E. Scenario-based impact assessment of land use/cover and climate changes on watershed hydrology in Heihe river basin of Northwest China. Adv Meteorol. 2015;2015:1-11.

Croke BFW, Merritt WS, Jakeman AJ. A dynamic model for predicting hydrologic response to land cover changes in gauged and ungauged catchments. J Hydrol. 2004;291:115-31.

Marshall E, Randhir TO. Spatial modeling of land cover change and watershed response using Markovian cellular automata and simulation. Water Resour Res. 2008;44.

Bozkaya AG, Balcik FB, Goksel C, Esbah H. Forecasting land-cover growth using remotely sensed data: a case study of the Igneada protection area in turkey. Environ Monit Assess. 2015;187:59.

Han H, Yang C, Song J. Scenario simulation and the prediction of land use and land cover change in Beijing, China. Sustain. 2015;7:4260-79.

Liping C, Yujun S, Saeed S. Monitoring and predicting land use and land cover changes using remote sensing and gis techniques - a case study of a hilly area, Jiangle, China. PloS one. 2018;13:e0200493.

Balzter H, Braun PW, Kohler W. Cellular automata models for vegetation dynamics. Ecol Model. 1998;107:113-25.

Cihlar J, Jansen L. From land cover to land use: a methodology for efficient land use mapping over large areas. Prof Geogr. 2001;53:275-89.

Aldhshan SRS, Shafri HZM. Change detection on land use/land cover and land surface temperature using spatiotemporal data of Landsat: a case study of Gaza strip. Arab J Geosci. 2019;12:1-14.

Yang J, Chen F, Xi J, Xie P, Li C. A multimarket land use change simulation model based on cellular automata and its application. Abstr Appl Anal. 2014;2014:1-11.

Musa SI, Hashim M, Reba MNM. Geospatial modelling of urban growth for sustainable development in the Niger delta region, Nigeria. Int J Remote Sens. 2018;40:3076-104.

Das S, Sarkar R. Predicting the land use and land cover change using Markov model: a catchment level analysis of the Bhagirathi-Hugli river. Spat Inf Res. 2019;27:439-52.

Chandwani V, Vyas SK, Agrawal V, Sharma G. Soft computing approach for rainfall-runoff modelling: a review. Aquatic Procedia. 2015;4:1054-61.

Hyandye C, Martz LW. A Markovian and cellular automata land-use change predictive model of the Usangu catchment. Int J Remote Sens. 2016;38:64-81.

Bello A-AD. Modelling the impacts of land-use and climate change in Skudai river watershed [dissertation]. Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; 2018.

Federal Ministry of Water Resources and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). The project for review and update of Nigeria national water resources master plan, Volume 4, National water resources master plan 2013. Nigeria: Federal Government of Nigeria; 2014.

Diyam Consultants. Upper Benue development phase I - draft report on the Gongola basin. Nigeria: Diyam Consultants; 1977.

Mishra PK, Rai A, Rai SC. Land use and land cover change detection using geospatial techniques in the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci. 2020;23(2):133-43.

Hassan Z, Shabbir R, Ahmad SS, Malik AH, Aziz N, Butt A, et al. Dynamics of land use and land cover change (LULCC) using geospatial techniques: a case study of Islamabad Pakistan. Springerplus. 2016;5:812.

Congalton RG. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ. 1991;37: 35-46.

Fenetahun Y, Yong-Dong W, You Y, Xinwen X. Dynamics of forage and land cover changes in Teltele district of Borana rangelands, southern Ethiopia: using geospatial and field survey data. BMC Ecol. 2020;20:55.

Fentie SF, Jembere K, Fekadu E, Wasie D. Land use and land cover dynamics and properties of soils under different land uses in the Tejibara watershed, Ethiopia. Sci World J. 2020;2020:1479460.

Eastman JR. Guide to GIS and Image Processing. Worcester: Clark University; 2012.

Subedi P, Subedi K, Thapa B. Application of a hybrid cellular automaton-Markov (ca-Markov) model in land-use change prediction: a case study of saddle creek drainage basin, Florida. Appl Ecol Environ Sci. 2013;1:126-32.

Iwuji M, Ibe C, Njoku J, Anyanwu S, Amangabara G, Ac-Chukwuocha N, et al. Analysis of land use and land cover dynamics in Orlu, Nigeria. Asian J Environ Ecol. 2017;4:1-10.

Ahmed B, Ahmed R. Modeling urban land cover growth dynamics using multi‑temporal satellite images: a case study of Dhaka, Bangladesh. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 2012;1:3-31.

Musa SI, Hashim M, Reba MNM. A review of geospatial-based urban growth models and modelling initiatives. Geocarto Int. 2016;32:813-33.

Lu Y, Wu P, Ma X, Li X. Detection and prediction of land use/land cover change using spatiotemporal data fusion and the cellular automata-Markov model. Environ Monit Assess. 2019;191:68.

Naschen K, Diekkruger B, Evers M, Hollermann B, Steinbach S, Thonfeld F. The impact of land use/land cover change (LULCC) on water resources in a tropical catchment in Tanzania under different climate change scenarios. Sustain. 2019;11:7083.

Awoniran DR, Adewole MB, Adegboyega SA, Anifowose AYB. Assessment of environmental responses to land use/land cover dynamics in the lower Ogun river basin, southwestern Nigeria. Afr J Environ Sci Tech. 2014;8:152-65.

Pontius RG, Millones M. Death to kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int J remote Sens. 2011;32:4407-29.

Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding Interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360-3.

Memarian H, Kumar Balasundram S, Bin Talib J, Teh Boon Sung C, Mohd Sood A, Abbaspour K. Validation of ca-Markova for simulation of land use and cover change in the Langat basin, Malaysia. J Geogr Inf Syst. 2012;04:542-54.