Gender-based comparison of students’ academic performance using regression models

Main Article Content

Aderibigbe Israel Adekitan
Olamilekan Shobayo

Abstract

The process required to gain admission into tertiary institutions is challenging for Nigerian students. This is due to the various examinations and requirements that must be met to be qualified for admission among innumerable applicants. It is therefore imperative that after admission, students must pursue academic excellence to justify the opportunity given to them, and this will also improve their chances of success after graduation. In a university, some first-year students struggle because of cultural disadvantages, as well as their economic and social backgrounds. This has resulted in poor performance by some students and inevitably led to bad grades at graduation and some drop out of the university without graduating. Female students are often said to perform a bit poorer in terms of academic performance. This study is a comparative performance analysis of male and female students in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM), conducted using regression models. Trend analysis shows that in this case study, female students have a tendency to improve on their academic performance from their first to their final year. The highest R-squared value of 0.7069 was achieved based on a regression analysis of the performance of 1,093 female students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Adekitan, A. I., & Shobayo, O. (2020). Gender-based comparison of students’ academic performance using regression models. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 47(3), 241-248. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/easr/article/view/218107
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

References

[1] Odia LO, Omofonmwan SI. Educational system in Nigeria problems and prospects. J Soc Sci. 2007;14(1):86-5.

[2] Labo-Popoola SO, Bello AA, Atanda F. Universal basic education in Nigeria: challenges and way forward. Soc Sci. 2009;4(6):636-43.

[3] Bertoni E, Di M, Molini V, Nisticò R. Education is forbidden: the effect of the Boko Haram conflict on education in North-East Nigeria. J Dev Econ. 2018:1-19.

[4] Barnes AE, Boyle H, Simmons S. Reforming teacher education in Nigeria: laying a foundation for the future. Teach Teach Educ. 2019;79:153-63.

[5] Odukoya JA, Bowale EI, Okunlola S. Formulation and implementation of educational policies in Nigeria. Afr Educ Res J. 2018;6(1):1-4.

[6] Akeel U, Bell S, Mitchell JE. Assessing the sustainability literacy of the Nigerian engineering community. J Clean Prod. 2019;212:666-76.

[7] Prainetr S, Yotmongkol K, Prainetr N. Development of teaching electrical technology integrating PBL and CBL and supporting STEM education. Eng Appl Sci Res. 2018;45(1):65-9.

[8] Pornsurat P, Changsri N, Inprasitha M. STEM education in mathematics education: focusing on students’ argumentation in primary school. Eng Appl Sci Res. 2018;45(4):316-9.

[9] Massagram W, Prapanitisatian S, Kesorn K. A novel technique for Thai document plagiarism detection using syntactic parse trees. Eng Appl Sci Res. 2018;45(4):290-300.

[10] Akinsowon OA, Osisanwo FY. Enhancing interest in sciences, technology and mathematics (STEM) for the Nigerian Female Folk. Int J Inform Sci. 2014;4(1):8-12.

[11] Akpan BB. Innovations in science and technology education through science teacher associations. Sci Educ Int. 2010;21(2):67-79.

[12] Zanden PJACVD, Denessen E, Cillessen AHN, Meijer PC. Domains and predictors of first-year student success: A systematic review. Educ Res Rev. 2018;23:57-77.

[13] Hu F. Do girl peers improve your academic performance?. Econ Lett. 2015;137:54-8.

[14] Goy SC, Wong YL, Low WY, Noor SNM, Fazli-Khalaf Z, Onyeneho N, et al. Swimming against the tide in STEM education and gender equality: a problem of recruitment or retention in Malaysia. Stud High Educ. 2018;43(11):1793-809.

[15] Stoet G, Geary DC. The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychol Sci. 2018;29(4):581-93.

[16] El Nagdi M, Roehrig GH. Gender equity in STEM education: the case of an Egyptian girls’ school. In: Fomunyam KG, editor. Theorizing STEM Education in the 21st Century. London: IntechOpen; 2019.

[17] Beede DN, Julian TA, Langdon D, McKittrick G, Khan B, Doms ME. Women in STEM: a gender gap to innovation. USA: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration; 2011.

[18] Adekitan AI, Salau O. Toward an improved learning process: the relevance of ethnicity to data mining prediction of students’ performance. SN Appl Sci. 2020;2(1):1-15.

[19] Pelumi O, Hilary O, Omoleye AO, Opanuga A. Analysis of the inter-relationship between students’ first year results and their final graduating grades. Int J Adv Appl Sci. 2018;5(10):1-6.

[20] Adekitan AI, Salau O. The impact of engineering students’ performance in the first three years on their graduation result using educational data mining. Heliyon. 2019;5(2):e01250.

[21] Oladokun V, Adebanjo A, Sc B, Charles-Owaba O. Predicting students academic performance using artificial neural network: a case study of an engineering course. Pac J Sci Tech. 2008;9:72-9.

[22] Arsad PM, Buniyamin N, Manan JA. Prediction of engineering students’ academic performance using artificial neural network and linear regression: a comparison. 2013 IEEE 5th Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED); 2013 Dec 4-5; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. USA: IEEE; 2013. p. 1-6.

[23] Hussain S, Atallah R, Kamsin A, Hazarika J. Classification, clustering and association rule mining in educational datasets using data mining tools: a case study. In: Silhavy R, editor. Cybernetics and Algorithms in Intelligent Systems. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 196-211.

[24] Sarra A, Fontanella L, Di Zio S. Identifying students at risk of academic failure within the educational data mining framework. Soc Indicat Res. 2019;146(1):41-60.

[25] Ramaswami G. Using educational data mining techniques to increase the prediction accuracy of student academic performance. Inform Learn Sci. 2019;120(7/8):451-67.

[26] Huang S, Fang N. Predicting student academic performance in an engineering dynamics course: a comparison of four types of predictive mathematical models. Comput Educ. 2013;61:133-45.

[27] John TM, Badejo JA, Popoola SI, Omole DO, Odukoya JA, Ajayi PO, et al. The role of gender on academic performance in STEM-related disciplines: Data from a tertiary institution. Data Brief. 2018;18:360-74.

[28] Oladele OM, Hou L. Students perspective comparison of higher education entrance examination: a tale of two countries; China and Nigeria education system. Acad Educ Leader J. 2019;23(2):1-16.

[29] Aribisala BS, Dosunmu OA, Akanbi MA, Shittu IO. Comparative analysis of university matriculation examination and post university matriculation examination admission models in Lagos State University. Ethiop J Sci Technol. 2018;11(2):129-43.

[30] Odukoya JA, Adekeye OA, Atayero AA, Omole DO, Badejo JA, John TM, et al. The predictive validity of university admission examinations: case study of Nigerian unified tertiary matriculation examination. Covenant Int J Psychol. 2018;3(1):1-10.

[31] Perrone L. Life after graduation as a “very uncomfortable world”: an Australian case study. Educ Train. 2003;45(2):69-78.

[32] Espinoza O, McGinn N. Graduates’ satisfaction as a measure of quality: Evidence from two programs in three Chilean universities. Int J Educ Res. 2018;90:133-43.