Design and fabrication of a downdraft gasifier coupled with a small-scale diesel engine

Main Article Content

Monorom Rith
Bernard Buenconsejo
Jose Bienvenido M. Biona

Abstract

Gasification technology plays a significant role to increase the potential exploitation of agro-waste products. This technology can convert solid dried biomass into a combustible gas, widely called syngas or producer gas. Producer gas can be used to run a diesel engine in a dual fuel mode to partially reduce diesel fuel consumption. However, determination of the dimensions of a gasifier and gas cleaning elements for a pre-specified capacity of a pilot-scale diesel engine remains unexplored. This study, therefore, intends to provide a heuristic concept to avoid an oversize, cumbersome design of a gasifier and a gas cleaning unit based on basic theory. A 5.7 kW diesel engine and a Jatropha seed feedstock were selected for our study. A type of closed top, throatless, downdraft gasifier with an annular space was chosen. A cyclone filter, a shell-tube heat exchanger, and a dried-bed filter were selected as the components of the gas cleaning unit. The cyclone filter’s dimensions were determined using the ideal gas principle. Next, basic heat transfer theory and fluid dynamics were applied to design a shell-tube heat exchanger. The results highlighted that the inner diameter of the designed gasifier should be 150 mm, and gasifier produced up to 27 kg/h of gas. At a biomass consumption rate of 5 kg/h, the gas production rate was 20 kg/h that substituted the diesel fuel consumption rate by up to 49% at 70% of the fuel engine load.  It is noteworthy that the gasification efficiency of Jatropha seed was 77%. The proposed concept is expected to be informative for the design of other gasifier types suitable for different biomass types. This technical article is written in a simple way, which is very useful for practitioners to understand and apply it for the fabrication of a small-scale gasifier-engine system.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rith, M., Buenconsejo, B. ., & M. Biona, J. B. . (2020). Design and fabrication of a downdraft gasifier coupled with a small-scale diesel engine. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 47(1), 117–128. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/easr/article/view/207366
Section
TECHNICAL

References

Basu P. Biomass gasification and pyrolysis-practical design and theory. London: Elsevier; 2010.

Yaliwal VS, Banapurmath NR, Gireesh NM, Tewari PG. Production and utilization of renewable and sustainable gaseous fuel for power generation applications: a review of literature. Renew Sustain Energ Rev. 2014;34:608-27.

Homdoung N, Tippayawong N, Dussadee N. Prediction of small spark ignited engine performance using producer gas as fuel. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2015;5:98-103.

Tsiakmakis S, Mertzis D, Dimaratos A, Toumasatos Z, Samaras Z. Experimental study of combustion in a spark ignition engine operating with producer gas from various biomass feedstocks. Fuel. 2014;122:126-39.

Sutheerasak E, Pirompugd W, Sanitjai S. Performance and emissions characteristics of a direct injection diesel engine from compressing producer gas in a dual fuel mode. Eng Appl Sci Res. 2018;45(1):47-55.

Raheman H, Padhee D. Combustion characteristics of diesel engine using producer gas and blends of jatropha methyl ester with diesel in mixed fuel. Int J Renew Energ Dev. 2014;3(3):228-35.

Singh R, Singh S, Pathak B. Investigations on operation of CI engine using producer gas and rice bran oil in mixed fuel mode. Renew Energ. 2007;32:1565-80.

Banapurmath NR, Tewari PG. Comparative performance studies of a 4-stroke CI engine operated on dual fuel mode with producer gas and Honge oil and its methyl ester (HOME) with and without carburetor. Renew Energ. 2009;34:1009-15.

Uma R, Kandpal T, Kishore V. Emission characteristics of an electricity generation system in diesel alone and dual fuel modes. Biomass Bioenerg. 2004;27:195-203.

Martinez JD, Mahkamov K, Andrade RV, Lora EE. Syngas production in downdraft biomass gasifiers and its application using internal combustion engines. Renew Energ. 2012;38:1-9.

Rith M, Arbon N, Biona JBM. Optimization of diesel injection timing, producer gas flow rate, and engine load for the diesel engine operated on dual fuel mode at a high engine speed. Eng Appl Sci Res. 2019;46(3):192-99.

Rith M, Biona JBM, Gitano-Briggs HW, Sok P, Gonzaga J, Arbon N, et al. Performance and emission characteristics of the genset fuelled with dual producer gas–diesel. DLSU Research Congress; 2016 Mar 7-9; Manila City, Philippines.

Maiti S, Bapat P, Das P, Chosh PK. Feasibility study of jatropha shell gasification for captive power generation in biodiesel production process from whole dry fruits. Fuel. 2013;121:126-32.

Shrivastava V, Jha AK, Wamankar AK, Murugan S. Performance and emission studies of a CI engine coupled with gasifier running in dual fuel mode. Procedia Eng. 2013;51:600-8.

Dhole A, Yarasu R, Lata D. Investigations on the combustion duration and ignition delay period of a dual fuel diesel engine with hydrogen and producer gas as secondary fuels. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;107:524-32.

Roy MM, Tomita E, Kawahara N, Harada Y, Sakane A. Performance and emission comparison of a supercharged dual-fuel engine fueled by producer gases with varying hydrogen content. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2009;34:7811-22.

Banapurmath NR, Tewari PG, Yaliwal VS, Kambalimath S, Basavarajappa YH. Combustion characteristics of a 4-stroke CI engine operated on Honge oil, Neem and Rice Bran oils when directly injected and dual fuelled with producer gas induction. Renew Energ. 2009;34:1877-84.

KIPOR. Kipor power operation manual [Internet]. 2010 [Cited 2019 Sep 27]. Available from: https://www.maruagro.com/img/kcfinder/files/KD188F%20usuario-MANUAL%20DE%20USUARIO.pdf.

Das D, Dash S, Ghosal M. Performance study of a diesel engine by using producer gas from selected agricultural residues on dual-fuel mode of diesel-cum-producer gas. World Renewable Energy Congress; 2011 May 8-13; Linkoping, Sweden.

Ramadhas AS, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C. Dual fuel mode operation in diesel engines using renewable fuels: Rubber seed oil and coir-pith producer gas. Renew Energ. 2008;33:2077-83.

Kreith F, Manglik R, Bohn M. Principles of heat transfer. 7th ed. Stamford: Global Engineering; 2011.

Jain AK, Goss JR. Determination of reactor scaling factors for throatless rice husk gasifier. Biomass Bioenerg. 2000;18:249-56.

Dogru M, Howarth CR, Akay G, Keskinler B, Malik AA. Gasification of hazelnut shells in a downdraft gasifier. Energy. 2002;27:415-27.

Reed TB, Das A. Handbook of biomass downdraft gasifier engine systems. Washington: Government Printing Office; 1988.

Patil K, Bhoi P, Huhnke R, Bellmer D. Biomass downdraft gasifier with internal cyclonic combustion chamber: design, construction, and experimental results. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:6286-90.

Olgun H, Ozdogan S, Yinesor G. Results with a bench scale downdraft biomass gasifier for agricultural and forestry residues. Biomass Bioenerg. 2011;35:572-80.

Munson BR, Young DF, Okiishi TH, Huebsch WW. Fundamentals of fluid mechanics. 6th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

Power N. Laminar vs Turbulent – Nusselt Number [Inernet]. 2019 [Cited 2019 Aug 04]. Available from: https://www.nuclear-power.net/nuclear-engineering/heat-transfer/convection-convective-heat-transfer/laminar-vs-turbulent-nusselt-number/.