A factors enabling to Knowledge Sharing and Transferring to Value Creation of THAI SMEs

Main Article Content

มีแสน แก่นชูวงศ์
ชลภัสส์ วงษ์ประเสริฐ

Abstract

This research paper aims to study the factors that facilitate the knowledge sharing and transferring to value creation of Small and Medium Enterprises or SMEs. The research question is what are key success factors for SMEs can create value to their business. This research is qualitative research and using phenomenology research. The selection of the key informant using snowball sampling technique by researcher asked a courtesy to the president of the Northeastern of Small and Medium Enterprises Association to Nominated entrepreneurs with the following features : 1) To be member of the Northeastern of Small and Medium Enterprises Association. 2) To be Thai business owner. 3) Export company only . 4) The business is awarded by private enterprise or government agencies can be considered a successful business, which have selected seven types of businesses and have chosen two organizations per types of businesses. They have comprised of 14 owners and 19 permanent staffs and data collection using in-depth interviews with key informants and the researcher talked unofficially too. The question used in the interview was based on literature review and related research in the knowledge sharing concept of the SECI Model of Nonaka & Takeuchi [14] and the knowledge transferring concept of Karl-Erik [17] and the value creation is the goal of the organization in view of three areas: 1) Customer value 2) Products. 3) Competency. They have been used in in-depth interviews to collect information to cover the issues they want to study, as well as to open up unspoken dialogues to gain access to the phenomenon. Subsequently, the results were generated, and categorized as in-depth interviews with key informants. The question was raised until the category was created. The data is stored and analyzed in the same process. The researcher analyzed the data and collected the data to be processed together.
The results of this study showed that the factors contributing to knowledge sharing and knowledge transferring into create business value of SMEs are two types: 1) The internal factors are four types : 1.1) The business goals; 1.2) Act as a role model; 1.3) Motivation; and 1.4) Acceptance of knowledgeable employees 1.5) The use of information technology to direct and transfer knowledge in how to work in production. 2) the external factors are five types : 2.1) The relationship of the founder's business; 2.2) The mutual benefit; 2.3) Accepting external networks who have more knowledge than themselves; 2.4) The organization that support the founders of government; and 2.5) The use of information technology and communication.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
แก่นชูวงศ์ ม. and วงษ์ประเสริฐ ช., “A factors enabling to Knowledge Sharing and Transferring to Value Creation of THAI SMEs”, Crma. J., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 145–159, Dec. 2017.
Section
Research Articles

References

คณะอนุกรรมการส่งเสริมการขับเคลื่อนการพัฒนาตามปรัชญาของเศรษฐกิจพอเพียงในภาคการเกษตรและชนบท, 2558. คู่มือการขับเคลื่อนการพัฒนาตามปรัชญาของเศรษฐกิจพอเพียงในภาคการเกษตรและชนบท และด้านความมั่นคง. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ ๑

ชัชวาล วงษ์ประเสริฐ, 2548. การจัดการความรู้ใน องค์กรธุรกิจ. กรุงเทพฯ : เอ็กซเปอร์เน็ท.

สถาบันคีนันแห่งเอเชีย, 2549. คู่มือการพัฒนาคลัสเตอร์เพื่อยกระดับความสามารถในการแข่งขันของภาคการผลิต และบริการ. กรุงเทพฯ : สถาบันฯ.

สมาคมการค้าเพื่อส่งเสริมผู้ประกอบการเทคโนโลยีรายใหม่ (Thailand Startup Association), 2016. รายงานการศึกษาปัจจัยและข้อเสนอแนะ เพื่อพัฒนา Startup Ecosystem ในประเทศไทย (THE WHITEPAPER for STARTUP THAILAND 2016)

สํานักงานส่งเสริมวิสาหกิจขนาดกลางและขนาดย่อม, 2554. แผนการส่งเสริมวิสาหกิจขนาดกลางและขนาด ย่อมฉบับที่ 3 พ.ศ. 2555-2559. ค้นเมื่อ 2 กันยายน 2553, จาก http://www.sme.go.th/SiteCollection Documents/203.pdf

Ahmed, P.K., Lim, K.K. & Loh, A.Y.E, 2002. Learning though knowledge management. Oxford: Butterwort Heinemann.

Connell, Raewyn W, 2007. Southern Theory : The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Sysney: Allen & Unwin.

Davenport, T. and Prusak, L, 1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Bost

Davenport, T.H. and Probst, G.J.B, 2002. Knowledge Management Case Book. Weinheim, Wiley.

Dewey, John, 1938. Experience & Education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi.

Donald N. Philip, 2010. Social Network Analysis to Examine Interaction Patterns in Knowledge Building Communities.

Huggins, R. and Johnston A, 2009. Knowledge Networks in an Uncompetitive Region: SME Innovation and Growth. Growth and Change. 40(2): 2227-259.

James, T, 2012. A Blueprint for Learning and Knowledge Creation. S. Michailova and K. Husted. Knowledge Sharing Hostility in Russian Firms. California Management Review, 45(3), 59-77.

Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H, 1995. The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.

Moorthy et al., 2012. A Study on Factors Affecting the Performance of SMEs in Malaysia International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(4), 2222-699.

Okyere-Kwakye and Nor, 2011. Title Individual Factors and Knowledge Sharing, Publication title American Journal of Economics and Business Administration Publication date 2011, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 66-72.

Sveiby K.E, 1997. The New Organisational Wealth - Managing and measuring Knowledge Based Assets. Berrett-Koehler, San Fransisco.

Rohana Ngah, Abdul Razak Ibrahim, 2009,International Journal of Management Innovation Systems 1 (1).

Yuen, A.J.K. and Ma, W.W.K, 2004. Knowledge sharing and teacher acceptance of web based learning system. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds). Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference. (pp. 975-983). Perth, 5-8 December. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/yuen.html