Knowledge Management in Military Intelligence Expert by CBR Technique: A Case Study of 3 Southern Boundary Provinces of Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this article was to propose the guidelines for the knowledgemanagement in military intelligence expert by CBR Technique: A case study of 3 southern boundary provinces by focusing on 2 issues of searching : 1) Is the system able to inference as the expert? 2) Is the system able to accumulate the knowledge and cause more efficiency? This article presented the following issues: 1) the Introduction 2) the current problems situation in military intelligence of Thailand 3) the applying of CBR to finding suspects of bombing cases in 3 southern boundary provinces and 4) the conclusions of the knowledge management in military intelligence expert. The conclusions of this article was 1) the system can inference as expert 84.33% 2) the system can accumulate the knowledge and cause more efficiency by self validation technique in 433 cases and reliable more than 90%
Article Details
Copyright of all articles published is owned by CRMA Journal.
References
Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994).Case-based reason-ing: Foundational issues, methodologicalvariations, and system approaches. ArtificialIntelligence Communications, 7(1), 39-59.
Leake, D B. (1996). CBR in context: the present and future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pakdeewatanakul, K. (2003). Decision Support System and Expert System. Bangkok: KTP Comp and Consult.
Roth-Berghofer, T. & Stahl, A. (2008).Rapid Prototyping of CBR Applications with the Open Source Tool myCBR. Retrieved June 21, 2011, from http://mycbr-project.net/download-mycbr-2.html
Roth-Berghofer, T. & Stahl, A. (2008). Similarity measures easily modeled myCBR. Retrieved June 25, 2011, from http://mycbr-project.net/download-mycbr-2.html
Zilles, L. (2009). myCBR Tutorial. Retrieved June15, 2011, from http://www.mycbr-project.net/tutorials.html
