Anaerobic co-digestion of tuna factory waste and banana crop residue for biogas production

Authors

  • Una Tontakulchanchai School of Renewable Energy Technology, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
  • Sarayooth Vaivudh School of Renewable Energy Technology, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand

Keywords:

Biogas, Tuna waste, waste management

Abstract

The objectives of this research are to produce biogas by the co-digestion of tuna factory waste and banana crop residue, then analyze the economic and environmental benefits.  In this research the biogas production supports tuna factory waste management system where the tuna factory waste got treated and converted into useful substances, such as biogas and high quality fertilizer. The aim of this work is to find optimal co-digestion substrates to enhance biogas production from fish wastes. The laboratory scale experiments carried out using 5 different ratios showed that the best anaerobic co-digestion of tuna waste and banana crop residue was achieved with the 2:1, where the biogas production was recorded approximately 113.43 l/d, with a methane content of 55.51%, while the startup COD was 54.46 g/l. In the 30 days evolution in the co-digestion the COD reduced up to 56.72%. The investigation provides useful information to determine the most proper ratios of different co-substrates which results in an optimized biodegradation and enhanced methane potential. The final destination of this research is to take this outcome into action at the full-scale.

References

Larsen, T., Thilsted, S.H. Kongsback, K &Hanse, M. (2001). Whole small fish as

arich Calcium source. British Journal of Nutrition, 83, 191 – 196.

Gueard, F., Dufosse, L., De La Broise, D. &Binet. A. (2001).Enzymatic

Hydrolysis of Proteins from yellow fin Tuna (Thunnus albacores) wastes using Alcalase. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 11, 1051 – 1059.

Babaee, A., Shayegan, J., Roshani, A., 2013, Anaerobic slurry co-digestion of

poultrymanure and straw: effect of organic loading and temperature. J. Environ, Health Sci, Eng. 11, 15.

APHA, AWWA, WEF, 2012, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wasterwater, 21th ed.Washington DC, USA.

Barnes, D. & Bliss, P.J. (1983), Biological control of nitrogen in wastewater treatment.

E. & F.N. Spon. London. 327 p.

Chan.Y., Cheng, J.J., Creamer, K.S. (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion Process: a review. Bioresource Technology 99, 4044-4064.

Madsen, M., Holm-nielsen, J.B., Esbensen, K.H., (2011), Monitoring of anaerobic digestion process: a review perspective. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 15, 3141-3155.

Carucci, G., Carrasco, F., Trifoni, K., Majone, M. and Beccari, M. (2005)

Anaerobicdigestion of food industry waste: Effect of Codigestion on Methane Yield. Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 1037.

Balaguer, M.D., Vicent M.T., Paris, J.M. (1992), Anaerobic fluidized bed

reactorwith sepiolite as support for anaerobic treatment of vinasses. Biotechno, Lett. 14, 433-438.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-11

How to Cite

Tontakulchanchai, U., & Vaivudh, S. (2016). Anaerobic co-digestion of tuna factory waste and banana crop residue for biogas production. Journal of Renewable Energy and Smart Grid Technology, 10(2), 19–25. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RAST/article/view/48597