Performance Assessment of a Standalone Residential Solar PV System for a 19.8 kWh/day Load:  A Comparative Study of Abuja, Beijing, and Washington DC

Anthony Ohajianya; Obinna Duru; Benjamin Okereke; Emmanuel Agbo; Muhammad Abdurrahman; Mustapha Shehu

doi:10.69650/rast.2026.267185

Authors

Anthony Chibuike Ohajianya Department of Physics, Federal University of Technology, Owerri P.M.B. 1526, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2452-1209
Obinna Miletus Duru Department of Physics, Federal University of Technology, Owerri P.M.B. 1526, Nigeria
Benjamin Okechukwu Okereke Department of Physics, Federal University of Technology, Owerri P.M.B. 1526, Nigeria
Emmanuel Paul Agbo Department of Physics, University of Cross River State, Calabar P.M.B. 1123, Nigeria
Muhammad Abdurrahman Department of Physics, Federal University Dutse, Jigawa State P.M.B. 7156, Nigeria
Mustapha Shehu Department of Physics, Federal University Dutse, Jigawa State P.M.B. 7156, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69650/rast.2026.267185

Keywords:

Off-Grid Solar PV, Lithium-Ion Battery Storage, Techno-Economic Analysis, Levelized Cost of Electricity, Multi-Location Study, Solar Energy Systems

Abstract

This study presents a comparative techno-economic assessment of a standalone residential solar photovoltaic (PV) system with LiFePO₄ lithium-ion battery storage designed to meet a relatively high household electricity demand of 19.8 kWh/day across Abuja (Nigeria), Beijing (China), and Washington DC (USA). PV system simulations were performed using PVsyst, while economic analysis was conducted over a 25-year project lifetime. Independent validation was additionally carried out using HOMER Pro. The results show significant variation in solar resource availability, with Abuja recording the highest global horizontal irradiation (2,042 kWh/m²/year), followed by Beijing (1,564 kWh/m²/year) and Washington DC (1,503 kWh/m²/year). The standalone PV systems demonstrated strong technical performance in all locations, achieving solar fraction values above 0.93, indicating reliable operation for high-demand residential applications. Beijing achieved the lowest levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of 0.176 USD/kWh and the lowest net present cost (NPC), while Washington DC exhibited the weakest overall techno-economic performance. Despite the favorable technical performance, all locations produced negative net present value (NPV) results, indicating that the standalone PV systems were not economically competitive with prevailing grid electricity tariffs under the adopted assumptions. Sensitivity analysis identified discount rate and battery storage cost as the most influential economic parameters. The HOMER Pro validation showed good agreement with the PVsyst results for annual energy production, LCOE, and NPC, confirming the robustness of the adopted simulation methodology. The findings demonstrate that both solar resource availability and local economic conditions strongly influence the feasibility of standalone PV systems for high-demand residential applications.

References

Kishore, T. S., Kumar, P. U. and Ippili, V., Review of global sustainable solar energy policies: Significance and impact. Innovation and Green Development. 4 (2025) 100224, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2025.100224.

Zhang, Y., Solar PV in the 21st century: Aligning technological growth with sustainability. Next Energy. 10 (2026) 100499, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxener.2025.100499.

Baurzhan, S. and Jenkins, G. P., Off-grid solar PV: Is it an affordable or appropriate solution for rural electrification in Sub-Saharan African countries? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 60 (2016) 1405-1418, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.016.

Féron, S. Sustainability of Off-Grid Photovoltaic Systems for Rural Electrification in Developing Countries: A Review. Sustainability. 8 (2016) 1326, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121326.

Lăzăroiu, G., Gmal Osman, M. and Strejoiu, C.-V. Performance Evaluation of Renewable Energy Systems: Photovoltaic, Wind Turbine, Battery Bank, and Hydrogen Storage. Batteries. 9 (2023) 468, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9090468.

Mokrani, Z., Serir, C., Rekioua, D., Oubelaid, A., Mezzai, N. and Rekioua, T., Reliable Solar Energy Solutions for Agriculture: Hybrid PV Battery Systems. Journal of Renewable Energies. 1 (2025) 43 – 55, doi: https://doi.org/10.54966/jreen.v1i1.1407.

McKenna, E., McManus, M., Cooper, S. and Thomson, M., Economic and environmental impact of lead-acid batteries in grid-connected domestic PV systems. Applied Energy. 104 (2013) 239-249, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.016.

Matteson, S. and Williams, E., Residual learning rates in lead-acid batteries: Effects on emerging technologies. Energy Policy. 85 (2015) 71-79, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.014.

Ngoy, K. R., Lukong, V. T., Yoro, K. O., Makambo, J. B., Chukwuati, N. C., Ibegbulam, C., Eterigho-Ikelegbe, O., Ukoba, K. and Jen, T.-C., Lithium-ion batteries and the future of sustainable energy: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 223 (2025) 115971, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115971.

Al-Ali, S., Olabi, A. G. and Mahmoud, M., A review of solar photovoltaic technologies: developments, challenges, and future perspectives. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 27 (2025) 101057, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101057.

Sepúlveda-Oviedo, E. H., A review of operational factors affecting photovoltaic system performance. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 26 (2025) 100942, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100942.

Udayakumar, M. D., Anushree, G., Sathyaraj, J. and Manjunathan, A., The impact of advanced technological developments on solar PV value chain. Materials Today: Proceedings. 45 (2021) 2053-2058, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.588.

Islam, M. I., Mahbubul, I. M., Jadin, M. S., Mansur, A. A. and Alharbi, T., Lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries for electric mobility applications: A comparative review of performance, economics, industry trends, and future outlook. Journal of Energy Storage. 155 (2026) 121187, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2026.121187.

Stanchev, P. and Hinov, N. Comparative Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment of Stationary Energy Storage Systems: Lithium-Ion, Lead-Acid, and Hydrogen. Batteries. 11 (2025) 382, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11100382.

Paul Ayeng'o, S., Schirmer, T., Kairies, K.-P., Axelsen, H. and Uwe Sauer, D., Comparison of off-grid power supply systems using lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries. Solar Energy. 162 (2018) 140-152, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.049.

Singh, B., Singh, P., Tejani, G. G., Sharma, S. K. and Mousavirad, S. J., Role of lithium-ion batteries in microgrid system. Transportation Engineering. 21 (2025) 100368, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2025.100368.

Ajibade, H., Ujah, C. O., Nnakwo, K. C. and Kallon, D. V. V., Improvement in battery technologies as panacea for renewable energy crisis. Discover Applied Sciences. 6 (2024) 374, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06021-x.

Hasan, M. M., Haque, R., Jahirul, M. I., Rasul, M. G., Fattah, I. M. R., Hassan, N. M. S. and Mofijur, M., Advancing energy storage: The future trajectory of lithium-ion battery technologies. Journal of Energy Storage. 120 (2025) 116511, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.116511.

Mandelli, S., Barbieri, J., Mereu, R. and Colombo, E., Off-grid systems for rural electrification in developing countries: Definitions, classification and a comprehensive literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 58 (2016) 1621-1646, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.338.

Sharma, R. and Tiwari, G. N., Life cycle assessment of stand-alone photovoltaic (SAPV) system under on-field conditions of New Delhi, India. Energy Policy. 63 (2013) 272-282, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.081.

Sun, B., Gao, K., Liu, S., Wei, Q. and Wang, H., Assessing the performance and economic viability of solar home systems: A way forward towards clean energy exploration and consumption. Renewable Energy. 208 (2023) 409-419, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.03.009.

Idris, W. O., Ibrahim, M. Z. and Alibani, A., Prospects of Solar Energy Exploration in Nigeria: Assessments, Economic Viability and Hybrid System. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 14 (2024) 676-686, doi: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14977.

Iweh, C. D., Gyamfi, S., Tanyi, E. and Effah-Donyina, E., Economic viability and environmental sustainability of a grid-connected solar PV plant in Yaounde - Cameroon using RETScreen expert. Cogent Engineering. 10 (2023) 2185946, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2185946.

Iturralde Carrera, L. A., Garcia-Barajas, M. G., Constantino-Robles, C. D., Álvarez-Alvarado, J. M., Castillo-Alvarez, Y. and Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J. Efficiency and Sustainability in Solar Photovoltaic Systems: A Review of Key Factors and Innovative Technologies. Eng. 6 (2025) 50, doi: doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6030050.

Keskin, V., Performance evaluation of water-based and soil-based photovoltaic systems: energy, exergy, environmental, and economic perspectives. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 27 (2025) 5249-5270, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-025-03166-0.

Leewiraphan, C., Ketjoy, N. and Thanarak, P., An Assessment of the Economic Viability of Delivering Solar PV Rooftop as a Service to Strengthen Business Investment in the Residential and Commercial Sectors. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 14 (2024) 226-233, doi: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.15505.

Pourasl, H. H., Barenji, R. V. and Khojastehnezhad, V. M., Solar energy status in the world: A comprehensive review. Energy Reports. 10 (2023) 3474-3493, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.10.022.

Elazab, R. and Daowd, M., Comparative analysis of PV technologies across diverse solar regions using sustainability metrics. Energy Informatics. 8 (2025) 107, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-025-00566-w.

Hamisu Umar, N., Bora, B., Banerjee, C., Gupta, P. and Anjum, N., Performance and economic viability of the PV system in different climatic zones of Nigeria. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 43 (2021) 100987, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100987.

Cristea, M., Cristea, C., Tîrnovan, R.-A. and Șerban, F. M. Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of Different Photovoltaic Technologies. Applied Sciences. 15, 6710 (2025), 6710, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126710.

Sahu, P. K., Chakraborty, C. and Roy, J. N., Comparative Economic Analysis of Bifacial Roof-top PV Systems. Energy for Sustainable Development. 83 (2024) 101593, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2024.101593.

Mandys, F., Chitnis, M. and Silva, S. R. P., Levelized cost estimates of solar photovoltaic electricity in the United Kingdom until 2035. Patterns. 4 (2023) 100735, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100735.

De Cian, E., Falchetta, G., Pavanello, F., Romitti, Y. and Sue Wing, I., The impact of air conditioning on residential electricity consumption across world countries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 131 (2025) 103122, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103122.

Nacht, T., Pratter, R., Ganglbauer, J., Schibline, A., Aguayo, A., Fragkos, P. and Zisarou, E. Modeling Approaches for Residential Energy Consumption: A Literature Review. Climate. 11 (2023) 184, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11090184.

Surahman, U., Hartono, D., Setyowati, E. and Jurizat, A., Investigation on household energy consumption of urban residential buildings in major cities of Indonesia during COVID-19 pandemic. Energy and Buildings. 261 (2022) 111956, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111956.

Agyekum, E. B., Odoi-Yorke, F., Abbey, A. A., Adegboye, O. R. and Rashid, F. L., Techno-economic, social and environmental analysis of different photovoltaic cell technologies under tropical weather conditions. International Journal of Thermofluids. 27 (2025) 101164, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101164.

Ijeoma, M. W., Chen, H., Carbajales-Dale, M. and Yakubu, R. O. Techno-Economic Assessment of the Viability of Commercial Solar PV System in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Energies. 16 (2023) 6803, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196803.

Arif, S., Taweekun, J., Ali, H. M., Ahmed, A. and Bhutto, A. A., Building Resilient communities: Techno-economic assessment of standalone off-grid PV powered net zero energy (NZE) villages. Heliyon. 9 (2023) e21426, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21426.

Rong, Y. and Sun, X., Discount Rate of China’s New Energy Power Industry. Energy Engineering. 119 (2021) 315-329, doi: https://doi.org/10.32604/EE.2022.015485.

Tufail, S., Riggs, H. and Sarwat, A., Techno-economic and environmental assessment of photovoltaic–battery microgrids across diverse U.S. states. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 30 (2026) 101668, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101668.

Njoku, H. O., Ifediora, K. M., Ozor, P. A. and Dzah, J. M., Typical performance reductions in pv modules subject to soiling in a tropical climate. Nigerian Journal of Technology. 39 (2021) 1158-1168, doi: https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v39i4.24.

Li, H. and F, L. V. Study on failure models and degradation rate of PV aged modules in field in China. in 2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC). (2018), 727-730, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547795.

Islam, M. I., Bin Jadin, M. S., Al Mansur, A. and Alharbi, T., Electrical Performance and Degradation Analysis of Field-Aged PV Modules in Tropical Climates: A Comparative Experimental Study. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 24 (2024) 100719, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100719.

Straub-Mück, M., Geyer-Klingeberg, J. and Rathgeber, A. W., Determinants of the long-term degradation rate of photovoltaic modules: A meta-analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 216 (2025) 115697, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115697.

International Renewable Energy Agency. Renewable energy technologies: Cost analysis series: Solar photovoltaics. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, (2012) 22-27.

Ramasamy, V., Zuboy, J., Woodhouse, M., O’Shaughnessy, E., Feldman, D., Desai, J., Walker, A., Margolis, R. and Basore, P. U.S. solar photovoltaic system and energy storage cost benchmarks, with minimum sustainable price analysis: Q1 2023. Report No. NREL/TP-7A40-87303, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, CO, USA, (2023) 10-43.

Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems. Photovoltaics report. Freiburg, Germany, (2023) 40-44.

Talavera, D. L., Muñoz-Cerón, E., de la Casa, J., Lozano-Arjona, D., Theristis, M. and Pérez-Higueras, P. J., Complete Procedure for the Economic, Financial and Cost-Competitiveness of Photovoltaic Systems with Self-Consumption. Energies. 12 (2019) 345, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030345.

Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), Supplementary order to the Multi-Year Tariff Order - 2024 for Ikeja Electricity Distribution Plc, <https://nerc.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/IE_May_2025_050.pdf> (2025).

International Energy Agency. Electricity Market Report 2023, <https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/255e9cba-da84-4681-8c1f-458ca1a3d9ca/ElectricityMarketReport2023.pdf> (2023).

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Electric Power Monthly with Data for December 2023. Washington, DC, USA, (2024) 120–124.

Vargas-Salgado, C., Díaz-Bello, D., Alfonso-Solar, D. and Lara-Vargas, F., Validations of HOMER and SAM tools in predicting energy flows and economic analysis for renewable systems: Comparison to a real-world system result. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 69 (2024) 103896, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2024.103896.

Ali, M. F., Sheikh, M. R. I., Mamun, A. A. and Hossen, M. J., Techno-Economic, Predictive Modeling, and Demand Response Analysis of a Renewable Energy-Based Microgrid for Residential Applications. IEEE Access. 13 (2025) 53748-53771, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3552056.

Bakare, M. S., Khan, H., Khan, O., Moinuddin, S. Q., Jribi, S., Abdalla, E. A. H., Bajaj, P. and Alaneme, G. U., A harmonized multi-software integrated workflow with targeted cross-validation for techno-economic optimization of hybrid renewable microgrids in rural Uganda. Environmental Sciences Europe. 38 (2026) 125, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-026-01405-9.

Al-Rasheedi, M., Gueymard, C. A., Al-Khayat, M., Ismail, A., Lee, J. A. and Al-Duaj, H., Performance evaluation of a utility-scale dual-technology photovoltaic power plant at the Shagaya Renewable Energy Park in Kuwait. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 133 (2020) 110139, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110139.

Shiwani, Gupta, S. K., Kanga, S., Singh, S. K., Meraj, G., Kumar, P. and Sajan, B., Enhancing urban sustainability through improved prediction and suitability analysis of solar energy potential in Bangalore, India. Next Energy. 11 (2026) 100523, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxener.2026.100523.

Marion, B., A model for deriving the direct normal and diffuse horizontal irradiance from the global tilted irradiance. Solar Energy. 122 (2015) 1037-1046, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.10.024.

Pereira, S., Canhoto, P. and Salgado, R., Prediction of Global Solar Irradiance on Parallel Rows of Tilted Surfaces Including the Effect of Direct and Anisotropic Diffuse Shading. Energies. 17, 3444 (2024), 3444, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143444.