An Evolutionary Programming Algorithm for Solving Unit Commitment Problem in Smart Grid Environment

Authors

  • Charles Christober Asir Rajan Department of EEE, Puducherry Technological University

Keywords:

Unit Commitment, Evolutionary Programming, Simulated Annealing, Legrangian Relaxation, Dynamic Programming

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to solving the unit commitment problem using Evolutionary Programming Algorithm (EPA) in smart grid environment. The objective of this paper is to find the generation scheduling such that the total operating cost can be minimized, when subjected to a variety of constraints. This also means that it is desirable to find the optimal generating unit commitment in the power system for the next H hours. This paper proposes distributed sources which includes electric vehicles and distributed generation. EPA, which happens to be a Global Optimisation technique for solving Unit Commitment Problem, operates on a system, which is designed to encode each unit’s operating schedule with regard to its minimum up/down time. In this, the unit commitment schedule is coded as a string of symbols. An initial population of parent solutions is generated at random. Here, each schedule is formed by committing all the units according to their initial status (“flat start”). Here the parents are obtained from a pre-defined set of solution’s i.e. each and every solution is adjusted to meet the requirements. Then, a random recommitment is carried out with respect to the unit’s minimum down times. The Neyveli Thermal Power Station (NTPS) Unit - II in India demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach; extensive studies have also been performed for different power systems consists of IEEE 10, 26, 34 generating units. Numerical results are shown comparing the cost solutions and computation time obtained by using the EPA and other conventional methods like Dynamic Programming, Legrangian Relaxation and Simulated Annealing and Tabu Search in reaching proper unit commitment.

References

Snyder, W. L., Powell, H. D., & Rayburn, C. (1987). Dynamic programming approach to unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 3(2), 339-350.

Hsu, Y. Y., Liang, C. C., Lin, C. J., & Huang, C. T. (1991). Dynamic security constrained multi-area unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 6, 1049-1055.

Samer T., & John R. B. (2000). Using integer programming to refine Lagrangian-based unit commitment solutions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15(1), 151-156.

Mohan, M. R., Kuppusamy, K., & Abdullah Khan, M. (1992). Optimal short-term hydro-thermal scheduling using decomposition approach and linear programming method. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 14(1), 39-44.

Ngundam, J. M., Kenfack, F., & Tatietse, T. T. (2002). Optimal scheduling of large-scale hydrothermal power systems using the Lagrangian relaxation technique. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 22(1), 237-245.

Bakirtzis, A. G., & Zoumas, C. E. (2000). Lambda of Lagrangian relaxation solution to unit commitment problem. IEE Proceedings - Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 147(2), 131-136.

Chang, C. P., Liu, C. W., & Liu, C. C. (2000). Unit commitment by Legrangian relaxation and genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15(2), 707-714.

Nieva, R., Inda, A., & Guillen, I. (1987). Lagrangian reduction of search-range for large-scale unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2, 465-473.

Cohen, A. I., & Yoshimura, M. (1983). A branch and bound algorithm for unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 102(2), 444-451.

Ouyang, Z., & Shahidehpour, S. M. (1990). Short term unit commitment expert system. International Journal of Electrical Power System Research, 20, 1-13.

Su, C. C., & Hsu, Y. Y. (1991). Fuzzy dynamic programming: an application to unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 6(3), 1231-1237.

Sasaki, H., Watanabe, M., Kubokawa, J., & Yorino, N. (1992). A solution method of unit commitment by artificial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 7(3), 974-981.

Padhy, N. P. (2000). Unit commitment using hybrid models: a comparative study for dynamic programming, expert systems, fuzzy system and genetic algorithms. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 23(1), 827-836.

Zhuang, F., & Galiana, F. D. (1990). Unit commitment by simulated annealing. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 5(1), 311-318.

Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecehi, M. P. (1983). Optimisation by simulated annealing. Science, 220, 671-680.

Shokri, Z., Selim, & Alsultan, K. (1991). A simulated annealing algorithm for the clustering problem. Pattern Recognition, 24(10), 1003-1008.

Mantawy, A. H., Abdel-Magid, Y. L. & Selim, S. Z. (1998). A simulated annealing algorithm for unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 13(1), 197-204.

Mantawy, A. H., Abdel-Magid, Y. L. & Selim, S. Z. (1998). A unit commitment by Tabu Search. IEE Proceedings - Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 145(1), 56-64.

Lin, W. M., Cheng, F. S., & Tsay, M. T. (2002). An improved tabu search for economic dispatch with multiple minima. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17(1), 108-112.

Bai, X., & Shahidehpour, M. (1996). Hydro-thermal scheduling by tabu search and decomposition method. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11(2), 968-975.

Wu, Y. G., Ho, C. Y., & Wang, D. Y. (2000). A diploid genetic approach to short-term Scheduling of hydro-thermal system. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15(4), 1268-1274.

Hong, Y. Y., & Li, C. Y. (2002). Genetic algorithm based economic dispatch for cogeneration units considering multiplant multibuyer wheeling. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17(1), 134-140.

Mantawy, A. H., Abdel-Magid, Y. L. & Selim, S. Z. (1999). Integrating Genetic Algorithm, Tabu Search and Simulated Annealing For the Unit Commitment Problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 14(3), 829-836.

Wong, K. P., & Wong, Y. W. (1996). Combined genetic algorithm / simulated annealing / fuzzy set approach to short-term generation scheduling with take-or-pay fuel contract. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11(1), 128-135.

Juste, K. A., Kita, H., Tanaka, E., & Hasegawa, J. (1999). An evolutionary programming solution to the unit commitment problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 14(4), 1452-1459.

Yang, H. T., Yang, P. C., & Huang, C. L. (1996). Evolutionary programming based economic dispatch for units with non-smooth fuel cost functions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11(1), 112-117.

Wood, A. J. & Woolenberg, B. F. (1996). Power Generation and control (2nd Edn). New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons.

Lu, L., Wen, F., Xue, Y., & Xin, J. (2011). Unit commitment in power systems with plug-in electric vehicles. Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 35, 16–20.

Khodayar, M. E., Wu, L., & Shahidehpour, M. (2012). Hourly coordination of electric vehicle operation and volatile wind power generation in SCUC. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3(3), 1271–1279.

Ikeda, Y., Ikegami, T., Kataoka, K. & Ogimoto, K. (2012, July 22-26). A unit commitment model with demand response for the integration of renewable energies. 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA.

Du, P., & Lu, N. (2011). Appliance commitment for household load scheduling. Appliance commitment for household load scheduling, 2(2), 411–419.

Moghimi, H., Ahmadi, A., Aghaei, J., & Rabiee, A. (2013). Stochastic techno economic operation of power systems in the presence of distributed energy resources. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 45, 477–488.

Goleijani, S., Ghanbarzadeh, T., Nikoo, F. S., &. Moghaddam, M. P. (2013). Reliability constrained unit commitment in smart grid environment. Electric Power Systems Research, 97, 100–108.

Downloads

Published

28 June 2021

How to Cite

Charles Christober Asir Rajan. (2021). An Evolutionary Programming Algorithm for Solving Unit Commitment Problem in Smart Grid Environment. Journal of Renewable Energy and Smart Grid Technology, 16(1), 51–65. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RAST/article/view/243534