DEVELOPMENT OF THE LINE CHATBOT “SPARKISTICS” TO ASSIST TEACHERS IN ANALYZING RESPONSES AND RECOMMENDING METHODS TO ENHANCE MATHEMATICAL REPRESENTATION COMPETENCY IN QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55003/JIE.24209Keywords:
LINE chatbot, Mathematical representation competence, Assistant for teachers, Educational technologyAbstract
This research resulted in the development of the LINE chatbot to assist teachers in analyzing students’ responses and recommending effective ways to enhance mathematical representation competency. The LINE chatbot provides individualized feedback and tailored instructional guidance aligned precisely with each student’s answer, thereby enabling teachers to support student learning more precisely and in greater depth. The tools employed in this research included the LINE Official Account, LINE Developer, and Dialogflow, all of which are capable of advanced natural language processing. The development data comprised 148 sets of student responses from assessments on the topic Qualitative Data Analysis and Presentation, collected from Matthayomsuksa 6 students. Of these, 109 sets were used to train the chatbot and 39 sets were used to test its overall performance, along with an associated scoring rubric. Data analysis was conducted using a confusion matrix, average values, and percentages. The research findings revealed that: 1) the LINE chatbot developed in this research, named “Sparkistics”, has the following capabilities: 1.1) facilitating the seamless delivery of important documents related to the assessment, 1.2) analyzing students’ responses through interactive, word-by-word chat interactions, and 1.3) providing concrete and actionable recommendations for promoting students’ mathematical representation competency; and 2) the chatbot’s performance in analyzing responses and assigning proficiency levels showed an average accuracy of 92.36%, precision of 92.36%, recall of 92.71%, and F1-score of 92.36%. The findings indicate that the “Sparkistics” LINE chatbot has sufficient potential for practical application to enhance mathematics teaching and learning in the classroom.
References
Adelusi, J. B. (2022). Hybrid rule-based and machine learning chatbots. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/387669510_Hybrid_Rule-Based_and_Machine_Learning_Chatbots.
Biswas, M. (2018). Beginning AI bot frameworks: Getting started with bot development. Apress.
Bureau of Academic Affairs and Educational Standards. (2025). AI usage guide for teachers, students, schools, and parents in Thailand, B.E. 2568. Office of the Basic Education Commission. (in Thai)
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Taylor & Francis.
Ertel, W. (2017). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Springer.
Fahmy, M. M. (2023). Confusion matrix in three-class classification problems: A Step-by-step tutorial. Journal of Engineering Research, 7(1), 1-11.
Jančarík, A., Michal, J., & Novotná, J. (2023). Using AI Chatbot for Math Tutoring. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2, 285-296.
Khan, R., & Des, A. (2018). Build better chatbots: A complete guide to getting started with chatbots. Apress.
Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational, 20(56), 1-17.
Lynch, S. M. (2013). Using statistics in social research. Springer.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2024). Artificial intelligence and mathematics teaching: A position of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/Position_Statements/NCTM_AI_Position_Statement.pdf.
OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (Version 4.0) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com.
Opesemowo, O. A. G., & Adewuyi, H. O. (2024). A systematic review of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: The emergence of 4IR. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(7), 1-11.
Panqueban, D. P., & Huincahue, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic review. Uniciencia, 38(1), 1-17.
Pellicer, L. F. A. O., Ferreira, T. M., & Costa, A. H. R. (2023). Data augmentation techniques in natural language processing. Applied Soft Computing, 132, 1-20.
Raj, S. (2019). Building chatbots with python: Using natural language processing and machine learning. Apress.
Russell, R. (2018). Machine learning: Step-by-step guide to implement machine learning algorithms with python. https://eprints.triatmamulya.ac.id.
Tanyarattanasrisakul, M., Lertamornpong, C., Kasemsukpipat, W., & Somchaipeng, T. (2025). Development of tasks to assess mathematical representation competency on “qualitative data analysis and presentation” for Matthayomsuksa 6 students, n. p. (in Thai)
Yi, L., Liu, D., Jiang, T., & Xian, Y. (2025). The Effectiveness of AI on K‑12 Students’ Mathematics Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23, 1105–1126.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Industrial Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
"The opinions and contents including the words in papers are responsibility by the authors."
"ข้อคิดเห็น เนื้อหา รวมทั้งการใช้ภาษาในบทความถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน"