A STUDY OF ANALYTICAL THINKING FOR MATTHAYOMSUKSA 2 STUDENTS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study of analytical thinking ability for Mathayom 2 students is an organization of learning to enable students to think analytically. This research sample group was 84 students from three classes of The Demonstration School of Ramkhamhaeng University in the first semester of academic year 2023. Purposive sampling was the method used for selecting the sample. The research tools were 1) science lesson plan about materials in everyday life, 2) analytical thinking ability test about materials in everyday life, 3) science learning achievement test about materials in everyday life, and 4) students’ satisfaction toward development of science learning. The statistics used to analyze the data were mean standard deviation, and t-test. The result found that students who have leant about material in everyday life via the 5E inquiry-based learning had post learning analytical thinking abilities higher than pre learning at the .05 level of significance. The students had post learning achievement higher than pre learning at the .05 level of significance and the overall of students’ satisfaction toward development of science learning was at the highest level.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
"The opinions and contents including the words in papers are responsibility by the authors."
"ข้อคิดเห็น เนื้อหา รวมทั้งการใช้ภาษาในบทความถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน"
References
Abdulloh U-ma, N., Mopan, N., Lateh, A., & Saree, O. (2018). Effect of 5Es inquiry-based learning of chemical equilibrium on mental models, chemistry achievement, and satisfaction of grade 11 students. Journal of Education, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus, 30(1), 181-194. (in Thai)
Bantaokul, P., & Polyiem, T. (2022). The use of integrated 5Es of inquiry-based learning and gamification to improve grade 8 student science learning achievement. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(1), 459-469. (in Thai)
Bard, E. (1975). Development of a variable-step programmed system of instruction for college physical education. Dissertation Abstracts, 35(a), 5947-A.
Brookfield, S. D. (2020). Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions (2nd ed., pp. 61-62). Jossey-Bass.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2020). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Creating teachable moments. (pp. 12–14). BSCS Science Learning.
Callister, W. D., & Rethwisch, D. G. (2020). Materials science and engineering: An introduction (10th ed., p. 4). Wiley.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research (pp. 5-6). Rand McNally College Publishing.
Chaiyasuk, P., & Yuenyong, C. (2021). Developing analytical thinking skills through STEM education in Thai context (pp. 45–46). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1797(1). IOP Publishing. (in Thai)
Chueapanya, J., Chaiprasert, P., Thongsorn, P., Sangkarn, P., & Detsri, C. (2019). A study of science achievement and attitude toward science of eighth grade students using cooperative learning team game tournament technique. Journal of Education and Innovation, 23(4), 134-145. (in Thai)
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
Fan, C. T. (1952). Note on construction of an item analysis table for the high-low-27-percent group method. Educational Testing Service, 1-6.
Janprieng, T., Wareebor, J., & Kerdthong, A. (2024). The development creativity skills and innovation of students bachelor degree Faculty of Education Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University with inquiry cycle (5Es) and five steps learning management. Rajabhat Rambhai Barni Research Journal, 3(1), 1. (in Thai)
Kammanee, T. (2002). Teaching methods: Diverse alternatives. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. pp. 111.
Kittiwut, K., Kittiwutkrai, K., & Samrong, S. (2021). A study of analytical thinking ability and academic achievement on the topic "Materials around us" through cooperative learning using the STAD technique of grade 2 students. Roi Kaen San Journal, 6(7), 262–271. (in Thai)
Kruetiwa, J. (2018). A study of analytical thinking abilities and learning achievement on light of eighth grade students using inquiry learning method (5E) with KWDL technique [Master’s thesis]. Burapha University.
Lai, E. R. (2020). Critical thinking: A literature review (pp. 26–27). Pearson Education.
Liu, X. (2019). Promoting critical thinking and creativity through inquiry-based science education. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 115-125. (in Thai)
Monpianjan, T., & Puengpetch, S. (2023). Studying daily computer skills and satisfaction with the inquiry cycle (5E) for grade 7 students. Journal of Educational Management and Research Innovation, 5(1), 61-72. (in Thai)
Nakakulbut, C. (2021). The development of analytical thinking and creativity through STEM education-based learning. Journal of Education, Silpakorn University, 20(1), 241-256. (in Thai)
Nawarat, N., & Khaokhiew, R. (2021). Science learning problems in Thai basic education and innovation-based learning development (pp. 91–92). Journal of Education and Learning, 15(2), 85-94. (in Thai)
Nonglak, J. (2022). Development of a learning activity model based on the 5E inquiry-based learning approach combined with problem-based learning (PBL) to promote problem-solving skills for 10th grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 45-58. (in Thai)
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2021). Active learning: Guidelines for enhancing students' competency-based learning. Ministry of Education, Thailand. https://www.moe.go.th/activelearning2021.
Office of the Education Council. (2019). Research and development report on Active Learning design guidelines. Ministry of Education, Thailand. https://www.onec.go.th/report2019.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Pearson Education.
Phanmanee, U. (2020). Guidelines for designing collaborative learning activities in the 21st century. Mahasarakham University Press.
Phatra, N. (1991). Kan pramen phol lae kan sang bap thotsob [Evaluation and test construction]. Bangkok: Tipyavisut. pp. 23.
Phonyiam, P., & Prasertsang, P. (2024). Guidelines for learning management the 5E of inquiry-based learning combined with high level questions technique. Kalasin University Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Innovation, 3(1), 68-85. (in Thai)
Phuangrat, T. (2007). Methods of research in behavioral and social sciences (7th ed.). Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University Testing and Psychology Press.
Phuduangchit, K. (2020). The development of an inquiry cycle (5E) of instructional model with POE to enhance learning achievement and integrated science process skills in movement and force for Matthayomsuksa 2 [Master’s thesis], Mahasarakham University, pp. 81-83.
Sattayanurak, S. (2021). Development of self-directed learning skills among secondary school students in the digital era. Chiang Mai University Press.
Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2020). Imagine if: Creating a future for us all. (pp. 88–90). Penguin Books.
Roth, W.-M. (2004). Teaching science in a constructivist way: Engaging students in problem-solving and inquiry. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(1), 101–110. (in Thai)
Srirasa, N. (2021). Learning management of inquiry-based learning (5E) with electronic books on learning achievement and satisfaction of upper secondary school students [Master’s thesis]. Department of Science Education). Burapha University. 127-142.
Srirasa, N., Chaiprasert, P., & Chitsirisawat, C. (2021). The learning achievement and satisfaction of upper secondary school students on learning management of inquiry-based learning (5E) with an electronic book. Journal of Education, Chulalongkorn University, 49(4), 1-14. (in Thai)
Srisuksa-at, B. (2010). Techniques for constructing data collection tools for research (7th ed.). Bangkok: Srianan Printing.
Suebsurmran, D., & Peangta, A. (2022). The development of science learning achievement on the topic of purification using gamification techniques of Grade 8 students, Rasi Salai School Sisaket Province. Academic and Research Journal, Northeastern University, 12(4), 86-98. (in Thai)
Suwanno, Y. (2019). Development of learning achievement and attitudes towards science learning of grade 6 students through 5E inquiry-based teaching [Master’s thesis]. Department of Curriculum and Instruction). Hat Yai University.
Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2021). Cognitive psychology (7th ed., pp. 112-113). Cengage Learning.
Thongsapaya, S., & Boonkusol, T. (2024). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning 5E teaching model in Human Anatomy and Physiology 2 to enhance analytical thinking and satisfaction of nursing students. UBRU Journal for Public Health Research, 3(1), 68-85. (in Thai)
Waengubon, N. (2023). Critical thinking: Essential 21st century skills. Journal of Applied Education, 1(2), 53-66. (in Thai)
Wimantanana, H. (2017). The effect of learning process with inquiry method on fundamentals of science II to enhancing analytical thinking abilities and teamwork for MathayomSuksa IV students [Master’s thesis]. Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Dhurakij Pundit University, pp. 849-861.