JOB CHARACTERISTICS AND JOB MOTIVATION OF OPERATIONAL EMPLOYEES IN PYLON PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this research is to 1) study the motivating factors of the Operational Employees in Pylon Public Company Limited on their Motivation Factor and Hygiene Factor, 2) study the characteristics and motivation of the Operational Employees in Pylon Public Company Limited, 3) compare the motivation on the performance of the Operational Employees in Pylon Public Company Limited by their personal approach. The sample study group for this research are the 206 operational employees of Pylon Public Company Limited by answering the prepared questionnaire. The statistic method used for data analysis are Mean of Percentage, I Arithmetic Mean, Standard Deviation (S.D), T–Test, One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Mutiple Linear Regression. The finding results revealed that 1) the comparison of the motivation of operational employees in Pylon Public Company Limited by personal factors are not significantly different, 2) the overall job characteristics of the employees’ on High Level as its Mean is 3.630 and Standard Deviation is 0.458, 3) the motivating factor and job characteristics of the employees plays a vital part that affects and influence the riperformance at 79.6 percent, a statistically significant level at .05 4) the hygiene factor and job characteristic of the employees is an important part of the task and their freedom to work have an influence on their motivation as the job performance of the employees is 58.1 percent, a statistically significant level at .05.
The research results were as follows:
1. The motivation of the Operational Employees in Pylon Public Company Limited has been at a high level.
2. The 2 cores of job characteristics model, the variety of skills and task significance are effected to motivation factor and the other 2 cores, task identity and autonomy are effected to hygiene factor
3. The employee with difference in sex, age, education level, income per month, work experience and department with different total level of Motivation Factor and Hygiene Factor at significant level 0.05
Article Details
"The opinions and contents including the words in papers are responsibility by the authors."
"ข้อคิดเห็น เนื้อหา รวมทั้งการใช้ภาษาในบทความถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน"
References
[2] ณัฐวุฒิ เตชันวัย. 2550. ขวัญกำลังใจในการปฏิบัติงานของพนักงานในอุตสาหกรรมประกอบรถยนต์(ประเทศไทย). วารสารครุศาสตร์อุตสาหกรรม,7(1).น.72-86.
[3] ชนาทิพย์ พลเสน. 2554. แรงจูงใจในการปฏิบัติงานและความผูกพันต่อองค์กรของพนักงานระดับปฏิบัติการในโรงงานอุตสาหกรรมชิ้นส่วนยานยนต์กรณีศึกษาบริษัทเคแอลเคiอินดัสตรี จำกัด. วารสารครุศาสตร์อุตสาหกรรม, 10(3), น.324-336.
[4] Humphrey, S. E.,Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P.2007. Integrating Motivational, Social, and Contextual Work Design Features: A Meta-Analytic Summary and Theoretical Extension of the Work Design Literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332-1356.
[5] Richer, S. F., Blanchard, C, M., & Vallerand, R. J.2002. A motivational model of work turnover. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2089-2113.
[6] Van den Broek, A., Vansteenkiste, M. & De Witte, H.2008. Self-determination theory: A theoretica iand empirical overview in occupational health psychology. In J.Houdmont & S. Leka (Eds.), Occupational health psychology: European perspectives on research, education, and practice. (pp. 63-88). Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.
[7] Jha, S.S., & Nair, S.K.(2008). Influence of Control, Job Characteristics and Superior-Subordinate Relationship on Psychological Empowerment: A Study in Five Star Hotels. Journal of Management Research,8, 147-161.
[8] Kraimer, M.L., Seibert, S.E., & Liden, R.C. 1999. Psychological Empowerment as a Multidimensional Construct: A Test of Construct Validity.Educational and Psychological Measurement,59,127-142.
[9] Van den Broek, A., Vansteenkiste, M., DeWitte, H., & Lens, W.2008. Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & Stress, 22, 277-294.
[10] Hackman, J. R. and G. R Oldham. 1980.Work Design. Massachusetts : AddisonWesly Publishing Co.,Inc