A SELECTION OF WAREHOUSE SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR ANIMAL FEED COMPANIES : CASE STUDIES IN SAMUTSAKHON

Main Article Content

ปัญญา สำราญหันต์
ณภพ ซ้ายสุวรรณ
นิธิศ ปุณธนกรภัทร์
ปิติพจน์ แซ่เล็ก
เผ่าพัชร จันทร์จำเนียร

Abstract

The objective of this research is to study and establish the criteria for choosing a public warehouse for feed ingredients storage in Samut Sakhon province. By using the warehouse selection criteria with the dimension of the efficiency evaluation of logistics activities consisting of 3 dimensions: cost dimension, time dimension, and reliability dimension and prioritize the importance of decision criteria with analytical hierarchy processes. Based on the evaluation of the opinions of 3 experts, the results of this research showed that the dimension with the highest to least priority is the cost dimension with the weight 0.661, reliability dimension is 0.272 and time dimension is weight value 0.067 and comparison of 2 public warehouse providers found that service providers have different advantages and disadvantages. By the result of the evaluation score with the equation to choose with the highest score is Service provider 2 has an assessment score of 0.437 and second score is Service provider 1 has an evaluation score of 0.185. Therefore, this research decided to choose the public warehouse service No. 2 to be used to store the feed ingredients of the sample animal feed manufacturer in Samut Sakhon.

Article Details

How to Cite
สำราญหันต์ ป., ซ้ายสุวรรณ ณ., ปุณธนกรภัทร์ น., แซ่เล็ก ป., & จันทร์จำเนียร เ. (2019). A SELECTION OF WAREHOUSE SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR ANIMAL FEED COMPANIES : CASE STUDIES IN SAMUTSAKHON. Journal of Energy and Environment Technology of Graduate School Siam Technology College, 6(2), 10–20. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JEET/article/view/215195
Section
Research Article

References

[1] Cengiz, A.E., et al., A Multi-criteria Decision Model for Construction Material Supplier Selection. Procedia Engineering, 2017. 196: p. 294-301.

[2] สำนักงานราชบัณฑิตยสภา. พจนานุกรม ฉบับราชบัณฑิตยสถาน พ.ศ.2554. กรุงเทพมหานคร: 2554.

[3] Lima Junior, F.R., L. Osiro, and L.C.R. Carpinetti, A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 2014. 21: p. 194-209.

[4] Alkhatib, S.F., et al., A novel technique for evaluating and selecting logistics service providers based on the logistics resource view. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015. 42(20): p. 6976-6989.

[5] อุไรวรรณ วรรณศิริ (2561), การลดความสูญเปล่าของคลังวัตถุดิบโดยระบบการระบุลักษณะด้วยคลื่นความถี่วิทยุ กรณีศึกษาโรงงานผลิตอาหารสัตว์น้ำ, วารสารวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยีนายเรืออากาศ, 14(1), กันยายน, หน้า 57-67.

[6] Evangelista, P., C. Colicchia, and A. Creazza, Is environmental sustainability a strategic priority for logistics service providers? J Environ Manage, 2017. 198(Pt 1): p. 353-362.

[7] Govindan, K., et al., Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012. 140(1): p. 204-211.

[8] Wong, J.-T., DSS for 3PL provider selection in global supply chain: combining the multi-objective optimization model with experts’ opinions. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2010. 23(3): p. 599-614.

[9] Soo Park, J. and D. Shin Chang, A study on the difference of supply chain performance from the fitness between competitive priorities and supplier selection criteria. Asian Journal on Quality, 2010. 11(2): p. 183-189.

[10] Lima-Junior, F.R. and L.C.R. Carpinetti, A multicriteria approach based on fuzzy QFD for choosing criteria for supplier selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016. 101: p. 269-285.

[11] Barker, T.J. and Z.B. Zabinsky, A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process. Omega, 2011. 39(5): p. 558-573.

[12] Scott, J., et al., A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015. 166: p. 226-237.

[13] Khan, H. , et al. , Drivers of Outsourcing and Selection Criteria 3rd Party Logistics Service Providers. International Journal of Operations and supply chain management, 2017. 10: p. 240-249.

[14] Falsini, D., F. Fondi, and M.M. Schiraldi, A logistics provider evaluation and selection methodology based on AHP, DEA and linear programming integration. International Journal of Production Research, 2012. 50(17): p. 4822-4829.

[15] Hwang, B. N., Chen, T. T., & Lin, J. T., 3PL selection criteria in integrated circuit manufacturing industry in Taiwan. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2016. 21: p. 103-124.
[16] วรพล ธนารักษ์สกุล, การศึกษาหลักเกณฑ์ในการเลือกผู้ส่งมอบด้วยกระบวนการโครงข่ายเชิงวิเคราะห์: กรณ๊ศึกษาอุตสาหกรรมยายนต์. วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต, ภาควิชาวิศวกรรมอุตสาหการ บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์, 2552.
[17] Jung, H., Evaluation of Third Party Logistics Providers Considering Social Sustainability. Sustainability, 2017. 9(5): p. 777.

[18] Li, Y.-L., et al., Third-party reverse logistics provider selection approach based on hybrid-information MCDM and cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 195: p. 573-584.

[19] Bask, A., et al., Environmental sustainability in shipper-LSP relationships. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 172: p. 2986-2998.

[20] Bai, C. and J. Sarkis, Integrating and extending data and decision tools for sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider selection. Computers & Operations Research, 2018.

[21] Zarbakhshnia, N., H. Soleimani, and H. Ghaderi, Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria. Applied Soft Computing, 2018. 65: p. 307-319.

[22] Yew Wong, C. and N. Karia, Explaining the competitive advantage of logistics service providers: A resource-based view approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010. 128(1): p. 51-67.

[23] Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the AHP.Pittsburg: RWS Publications.

[24] วันนิมิต คำปัญญา และตรีทศ เหล่าศิริหงส์ทอง. การคัดเลือกซัพพลายเออร์บนพื้นฐานแนวคิดแห่งความยั่งยืนด้วยวิธีกระบวนการลำดับชั้นเชิงวิเคราะห์ฟัซซี่. วิศวกรรมสารฉบับวิจัยและพัฒนา, 2557. 25(4): p. 81-88.

[25] Jharkharia, S. and R. Shankar, Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega, 2007. 35(3): p. 274-289.

[26] Gurcan, O.F., et al., Third Party Logistics (3PL) Provider Selection with AHP Application. In: 12th International Strategic Management Conference, ISMC 2016, 28-30 October 2016, pp. 226-234.

[27] Bulgurcu, B. and G. Nakiboglu, An extent analysis of 3PL provider selection criteria: A case on Turkey cement sector. Cogent Business & Management, 2018. 5(1)

[28] Min, H., Application of a decision support system to strategic warehousing decisions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2009. 39(4): p. 270-281.

[29] Liu, C.-L. and A.C. Lyons, An analysis of third-party logistics performance and service provision. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2011. 47(4): p. 547-570.

[30] Yang, J.L. and G.-H. Tzeng, An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011. 38(3): p. 1417-1424.

[31] Govindan, K., et al., Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012. 140(1): p. 204-211.

[32] Aguezzoul, A., Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods. Omega, 2014. 49: p. 69-78.

[33] Alkhatib, S.F., et al., A novel technique for evaluating and selecting logistics service providers based on the logistics resource view. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015. 42(20): p. 6976-6989.

[34] Bask, A., et al., Environmental sustainability in shipper-LSP relationships. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 172: p. 2986-2998.

[35] Heshan Y, Jiading W., Selection of a Logistics Service Provider Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach. Bachelor Thesis, University of Gavle, 2014.

[36] Prakash, C. and M.K. Barua, A combined MCDM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2016. 7: p. 66-78.

[37] กันต์ธมน สุขกระจ่าง. ปัจจัยที่ส่งผลต่อกระบวนการตัดสินใจในการเลือกทำเลที่ตั้งของร้านขายแก๊ส โดยวิธี AHP. วารสารวิชาการคณะเทคโนโลยีอุตสาหกรรม มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏลำปาง, 2557. 10(1): p. 1-11.

[38] กรมโยธาธิการและผังเมือง. กฎกระทรวงให้ใช้บังคับผังเมืองรวมจังหวัดสมุทรสาคร พ.ศ. ๒๕๖๐. กรุงเทพมหานคร: 2560.

[39] Jung, H., Evaluation of Third Party Logistics Providers Considering Social Sustainability. Sustainability, 2017. 9(5): p. 777.

[40] ประทุม สุดใจ, การตัดสินใจเช่าคลังสินค้าของสถานประกอบการ ในคลังสินค้าบริษัท โชติธนวัฒน์ จำกัด. วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต, บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร, 2558.