Comparative Study on Flexural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams Cast by Using Hydraulic Cement and Ordinary Portland Cement

Authors

  • Chanchai Ngohpok Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan
  • Jaksada Thumrongvut Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan
  • Namchai Joysoongnern College of Innovative Skills, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan
  • Cherdsak Suksiripattanapong Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan
  • Sittichai Seangatith School of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55003/ETH.410202

Keywords:

Reinforced Concrete Beam, Hydraulic Cement, Flexure, Environmentally Friendly

Abstract

This paper is a comparative study of the flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams cast by using hydraulic cement and ordinary Portland cement for construction applications. The main variables used in this research comprise of type of cement, ultimate compressive strength of concretes, and curing time. Two different types of cement, including hydraulic cement and ordinary Portland cement, were used at three different ultimate compressive strengths of 18 MPa, 25 MPa, and 32 MPa with the curing times of 28 and 90 days. The beams' nominal span-to-depth  ratio is 8.0. The results showed that the reinforced concrete beams cast by using hydraulic cement and ordinary Portland cement had similar flexural behavior and failure patterns. Both types of the reinforced concrete beams exhibit linear elastic behavior up to approximately 80–90% of their maximum applied load. Then, the behavior of the beams is nonlinear in that the deflection increased rapidly with a slight increase in the applied load until reaching their failure. In addition, based on the experimental results obtained from this study, it was found that the ACI design equations are acceptable for predicting the design strength of the reinforced concrete beams cast by using hydraulic cement and the hydraulic cement can be an equivalent substitute for ordinary Portland cement for the reinforced concrete beams used in this study. Therefore, this application of the hydraulic cement is not only the environmentally friendly practices, but also promoting low-carbon society as well.

References

J. Thumrongvut, S. Seangatith and K. Kumlue, “Effects of Flexural Strengthening with Non–Prestressed Wires on Precast Partially–Prestressed Concrete Beams,” RMUTI Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 16–33, 2014. (in Thai)

M. Lehmann and W. Glodkowska, “Shear Capacity and Behaviour of Bending Reinforced Concrete Beams Made of Steel Fibre–Reinforced Waste Sand Concrete,” materials, vol. 14, no. 11, 2021, Art. no. 2996, doi: 10.3390/ma14112996.

J. Thumrongvut, S. Seangatith and K. Kumlue, “Tests on Structural Behaviors of Precast Partially–Prestressed Concrete Beam's Joints,” RMUTI Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 15–30, 2013. (in Thai)

T. Bobalo, Y. Blikharskyy, J. Selejdak, N. Kopiika and Z. Blikharskyy, “Concrete Beams Reinforced with High Strength Rebar in Combination with External Steel Tape,” applied sciences, vol. 13, no. 7, 2023, Art. no. 4528, doi: 10.3390/app13074528.

J. Thumrongvut, S. Seangatith, C. Phetchuay and C. Suksiripattanapong, “Comparative Experimental Study of Sustainable Reinforced Portland Cement Concrete and Geopolymer Concrete Beams Using Rice Husk Ash,” sustainability, vol. 14, no. 16, 2022, Art. no. 9856, doi: 10.3390/su14169856.

T. Phoo–ngernkham, S. Hanjitsuwan, S. Detphan, J. Thumrongvut, C. Suksiripattanapong, N. Damrongwiriyanupap, P. Chindaprasirt and S. Hatanaka, “Shear Bond Strength of FA–PC Geopolymer under Different Sand to Binder Ratio and Sodium Hydroxide Concentration,” International Journal of Geomate, vol. 14, no. 42, pp. 52–57, 2018, doi: 10.21660/2018.42.7152.

N. Bokkhunthod, J. Thumrongvut, J. Supromwan and S. Seangatith, “Experimental Study of Cellular Lightweight Concrete–Filled Steel Tube Columns Using Hydraulic Cement,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 922, pp. 147–152, 2022, doi: 10.4028/p-3zquh9.

M. Ghrici, S. Kenai and M. Said–Mansour, “Mechanical Properties and Durability of Mortar and Concrete Containing Natural Pozzolana and Limestone Blended Cements,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 542–549, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.04.009.

Hydraulic cement, TIS 2594–2556, Thai Industrial Standards Institute, Bangkok, Thailand, May. 2013

Standard Performance Specification for Hydraulic Cement, ASTM C1157–17, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.

J. Thumrongvut, P. Khamphay, S. Seangatith, S. Pantawee and J. Supromwan, “Axial Load Performance of Concrete–Filled Steel Tube Columns with Hydraulic Cement and Strengthened by Steel Bars,” Ladkrabang Engineering Journal, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 117–127, 2023. (in Thai)

N. Joysoongnern, J. Thumrongvut, C. Suksiripattanapong and S. Seangatith, “Behavior and Strength of Circular Hydraulic Cement Concrete–Filled Steel Tube Columns,” Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya Research Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 348–360, 2023. (in Thai)

Portland Cement, TIS 15–2562, Thai Industrial Standards Institute, Bangkok, Thailand, 2019.

Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete, ACI 211.1–91, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2009.

Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimen, ASTM C39–18, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018.

Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon–Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, ASTM A615, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018.

Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI 318–19, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2019.

J. Thumrongvut and S. Seangatith, “Effect of Embedded Length Steel Channel Sections on Precast Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2006. (in Thai)

A. R. Mazumdar and T. Pheeraphan, “Comparative Study of Properties of Concrete Made of Hydraulic Cement (TIS 2594) and Ordinary Portland Cement (TIS 15),” Journal of Thailand Concrete Association, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2021.

S. Pantawee, J. Thumrongvut, J. Supromwan, C. Suksiripattanapong, N. Joysoongnern and W. Chupkhunthod, “Axial Compression Performance of Rectangular Concrete–Filled Steel Tubular Columns Using Environmentally Friendly Hydraulic Cement,” RMUTI Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 66–77, 2023. (in Thai)

G. L. Golewski, “The Role of Pozzolanic Activity of Siliceous Fly Ash in the Formation of the Structure of Sustainable Cementitious Composites,” sustainable chemistry, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 520–534, 2022, doi: 10.3390/suschem3040032.

G. du Toit, E. M. van der Merwe, R. A. Kruger, J. M. McDonald and E. P. Kearsley, “Characterisation of the Hydration Products of a Chemically and Mechanically Activated High Coal Fly Ash Hybrid Cement,” minerals, vol. 12, no. 2, 2022, Art. no. 157, doi: 10.3390/min12020157.

M. Alhassan, R. Al-Rousan and A. Ababneh, “Flexural Behavior of Lightweight Concrete Beams Encompassing Various Dosages of Macro Synthetic Fibers and Steel Ratios. Case Studies in Construction Materials,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 7, pp. 280–293, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2017.09.004.

A. A. Mohammed, “Flexural Behavior and Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams Made of Recycled PET Waste Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 155, pp. 593–604, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.096.

A. Fuzail Hashmi, M. Shariq and A. Baqi, “Flexural performance of high volume fly Ash reinforced concrete beams and slabs,” Structures, vol. 25, pp. 868–880, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.071.

A. Naqi and J.G. Jang, “Recent Progress in Green Cement Technology Utilizing Low–Carbon Emission Fuels and Raw Materials: A Review,” sustainability, vol. 11, no. 2, 2019, Art. no. 537, doi: 10.3390/su11020537.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-24

How to Cite

[1]
C. . Ngohpok, J. . Thumrongvut, N. . Joysoongnern, C. . Suksiripattanapong, and S. . Seangatith, “Comparative Study on Flexural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams Cast by Using Hydraulic Cement and Ordinary Portland Cement”, Eng. & Technol. Horiz., vol. 41, no. 2, p. 410202, Jun. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Articles