Financial Risk Analysis Framework of Stakeholders in PPP O&M Contracts for Inter-City Motorway Projects

Authors

  • Nantaphat Pintobtang Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University
  • Nakhon Kokkaew Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

Risk analysis, PPP, O&M contract, Availability payment, Stakeholders, Motorway

Abstract

Public Private Partnership (PPP) has been welcomed by government around the world as an innovative infrastructure delivery. Currently, there is a new type of PPP arrangements that is being employed in the highway sector in Thailand called PPP O&M Gross Cost in which the private operator is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project to meet performance specification and will be paid for a fixed sum of money over the contract period and the public agency is responsible for land acquisition, construction cost, and still bears the market risks such as tolled revenue risk. In PPP O&M contracts, compensation made to the private operator will be linked to output performance. This payment mechanism is called “availability payment.” Under this payment mechanism, the actual compensation will be adjusted by performance deduction to be calculated in each period if the private operator fails to meet performance specifications of the contract. This article is to present risk analysis framework using Monte Carlo simulation of key stakeholders in PPP O&M contracts, namely, public agency, private operator, and lenders. The proposed framework is then applied to a case study project named Motorway#6 (Bang Pa-In to Nakhon Ratchasima). Based on the application of the proposed financial risk analysis framework, this study found that the financial risk of the public agency was high. However, the public agency must include economic benefits into the evaluation since financial NPV is only part of the whole public project evaluation. As for private operator, the financial risk is relatively high as well. This is mainly due to the low bid price of the private operator. Finally, lender’s risk of the default of the loan, measured using DSCR, was quite low since the mean of the DSCR was greater than 1 over the course of the term loan.

References

B. Weber and W.H. Alfen, “Infrastructure–An Overview,” in Infrastructure as an Asset Class, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2012, ch. 1, sec. 1.1–1.3, pp. 1–20.

M. Garvin and D. Bosso, “Assessing the Effectiveness of Infrastructure Public—Private Partnership Programs and Projects,” Public Works Management & Policy, vol 13, no. 2, pp.162–178, 2008, doi: 10.1177/1087724X08323845

E. Engel, R. Fischer and A. Galetovic, “Public-Private Partnerships: Some Lessons After 30 Years. Regulation,” vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 30–35, 2020.

S. Guiny, D. Mirchandani, B. Clark, M. Ham, V. Hallikeri and Sasha Page, “Public-Private Partnership Availability Payment Concessions Model Contract Guide,” Federal Highway Administration Office of Innovative Program Delivery, Washington, DC, USA, Rep. FHWA-HIN-17-002, 2016. [Online]. Available:https://www.transportation.gov/buildamerica/sites/buildamerica.dot.gov/files/2019-08/ap_concession_model_p3_contract_guide_0117_0.pdf

Public-Private Partnerships (P3s), 2017. [Online]. Available:https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/pdfs/fact_sheets/techtools_P3_payment_mechanisms.pdf

A. Mahmoud., “A survey of the payment mechanisms for transportation DBFO projects in British Columbia,” Construction Management & Economics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 529–543, 2007, doi: 10.1080/01446190601161465

A. A. Aziz and K. Abdelhalim, “Comparative Analysis of P3 Availability Payments in the USA and Canada,” Second International Conference on Public-Private Partnerships, Austin, TX, USA, May 26–29, 2015, pp. 560–573, 2017, doi: 10.1061/9780784480267.044

Ministry of Transport, “Public Private Partnership for Operation and Maintenance (O&M), Bang Pa-In - Nakhon Ratchasima Intercity Motorway Project,” Department of Highways, Bangkok, Thailand, Proposal Volume 4 DOH's Reqirement: Part 3 Outline Operation and Maintenance Specification Rep., 2019.

J. Mun, “On the Shores of Monaco” in Modeling Risk: Applying Monte Carlo Simulation, Real Options Analysis, Stochastic Forecasting, and Optimization Techniques, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons,Ltd., 2006, ch. 4, sec. 3, pp. 74–77.

Suranaree University of Technology, “Study and analysis of the feasibility of Public-Private Partnership for Operation&Maintenance (O&M) Intercity Motorway Bang Pa-in - Nakornratchasima,”. Department of Highways, Bangkok, Thailand, main Rep., 2016.

D. Vose, “Modelling correlation and dependencies” in Risk Analysis–A Quantitative Guide.: Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2008, ch. 13, sec.4, pp. 380.

H. Pérez-Acebo, N. Mindra, A. Railean and E. Rojí, “Rigid pavement performance models by means of Markov Chains with half-year step time,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 830–843, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10298436.2017.1353390

Downloads

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

[1]
N. Pintobtang and N. Kokkaew, “Financial Risk Analysis Framework of Stakeholders in PPP O&M Contracts for Inter-City Motorway Projects”, Eng. & Technol. Horiz., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 36–51, Dec. 2022.

Issue

Section

Research Articles