Comparison of Plant Layout Using CORELAP, ALDEP and SLP Methodology: Case Study of Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing Plant
Keywords:
Factory Layout, SLP, CORELAP, ALDEP, Printed Circuit Board, Surface Mount DeviceAbstract
This research aimed to analyze plant layout options for the surface mount device (SMD) process. The research work applied the concept of the three algorithms, i.e., 1. systematic layout planning (SLP), 2. computerized relationship layout planning (CORELAP), and 3. automated layout design program (ALDEP). A total of 12 alternative factory layouts were created and compared in terms of the distance of moving parts per day. It was found that the factory layout type 1 by SLP had the lowest distance for moving parts per day. When comparing the factory layout before and after the improvement, it was found that the moving distance for the layout type 1 by SLP was reduced by 32.68%. The results from this research showed that the SLP and ALDEP techniques ranked first and second, with an average distance of 27,747 and 29,627 meters per day, respectively, in terms of effectiveness. The CORELAP technique seemed very inferior among all three techniques, with an average distance of 30,864 meters per day.
References
L. Shengsong, W. Min and H. Zhijian, “Hybrid algorithm of chaos optimisation and SLP for optimal power flow problems with multimodal characteristic,” IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 150, no. 5, pp. 543–547, 2003, 10.1049/ip-gtd:20030561.
R. Mother, “Chart the relationships,” in Systematic Layout Planning, 2nd ed., Boston, MA, USA: Cahners Books, 1973, ch. 1, pp. 3–14.
R. J. Najy, “Design Technology for Layout,” Journal of University of Babylon, vol 22, no.4, pp. 832–844, 2014.
T. Somsak, “Introduction of plant layout and design,” in Plant Layout and Design, 12nd ed., Bangkok, Thailand: Technology Promotion Association (Thai-Japanese), 2002, ch. 1, pp. 5–12.
W. Monsupee and C. Paveena, “Analysis of Front-axle Line Layout Alternatives”, Engineering journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 19–34, 2012, doi: 10.4186/ejth.2011.3.3.19.
S. Jenchira and K. Panisara, “Plant layout and Design of Furniture Factory,” B.E. project, Dept. Inno Eng., Dhurakij Pundit Univ., Bangkok, Thailand, 2019.
C. Ruephuwan, “Multi-Criteria for Plant Layout Evaluation Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Combined with Goal Programming Model: A Case Study of an Automotive,” Thai Industrial Engineering Network Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp 28–42, 2020.
L. Gozali, L. Widodo, S. R. Nasution and N. Lim. “Planning the New Factory Layout of PT Hartekprima Listrindo using Systematic Layout Planning (SLP) Method,” IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 847, no. 1, pp. 012001, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/847/1/012001.
Y. Pakhwan and T. Hathaikan, Plant Layout lmprovement of Wetsuit Factory [Online]. Available: https://ie.eng.cmu.ac.th/IE2014/downloads/2020_03/851/Presentation.pdf
I. Hakim and M. V. Istiyanti. “Improvement of layout production facilities for a secondary packaging area of a pharmaceutical company in Indonesia using the CORELAP method,” International Journal of Technology, vol 6, no. 6, pp. 1006–1016, 2015, doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v6i6.1449.
A. C. Sembiring, I. Budiman, A. Mardhatillah, U. P. Tarigan and A. Jawira. “An application of corelap algoritm to improve the utilization space of the classroom,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1007, No. 1, pp. 012026, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1007/1/012026.
U. Tarigan, F. D. Cahyo, U. P. P. Tarigan, and E. Ginting. “Facility layout design through integration of lean manufacturing method and CORELAP algorithm in concrete factory,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 505, no. 1, pp. 012015, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012015
N. P. Jati, A. D. I. Rahayu, S. E. Salsabila and d. A. Azzam, “Facility Layout Design with Corelap Algorithm for Educational Tour,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 982, no.1, pp. 012060, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/982/1/012060.
F. Budianto, J. Halim and A. C. Sembiring, “Redesigning Furniture Production Floors Using Systematic Layout Planning and ALDEP Method to Minimize Material Handling Costs,” in International Conference on Mechanical, Electronics, Computer, and Industrial Technology, Medan, Indonesia, Jun. 25–27, 2020, Art. no. 19890174, doi: 10.1109/MECnIT48290.2020.9166613.
U. Tarigan, R. Simbolon, M. T. Sembiring, U. P. P. Tarigan, N. Sembiring and I. R. Tarigan, “Perancangan Ulang dan Simulasi Tata Letak Fasilitas Produksi Gripper Rubber Seal dengan Menggunakan Algoritma Corelap, Aldep, dan Flexsim,” Jurnal Sistem Teknik Industri, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 74–84, 2019, doi: 10.32734/jsti.v21i1.905.
S. S. Heragu, “Traditional approaches to facility layout,” in Facilities design,” Boca Raton, FL, USA: Crc Press, 2018, ch. 4, pp. 75–99.
A. Langevin and D. Riopel, “Models and methods for facilities layout design from an applicability to real-world perspective,” in Logistics systems: design and optimization, New York, NY, USA: Springer Science & Business Media, 2005, ch. 5, pp. 123–170.
J. A. Tompkins, J. A. White, Y. A. Bozer and J. M. A. Tanchoco, “Layout planning models and design algorithms,” in Facilities planning, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2010, ch. 6, sec. 2, pp. 292–363.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The published articles are copyrighted by the School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang.
The statements contained in each article in this academic journal are the personal opinions of each author and are not related to King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang and other faculty members in the institute.
Responsibility for all elements of each article belongs to each author; If there are any mistakes, each author is solely responsible for his own articles.
