(การประยุกต์ใช้เทคนิค Hybrid DEA-TOPSIS สำหรับการคัดเลือกวัสดุชีวมวลที่เหมาะสมสำหรับการแปรรูปเป็นแท่งเชื้อเพลิง)(Using the Hybrid DEA-TOPSIS Technique for Selecting the Suitable Biomass Materials for Processing into Fuel Briquettes )

Authors

  • นรงค์ วิชาผา Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology, Kalasin University
  • อัจฉรา ชุมพล Department of Computer and Automation Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology, Kalasin University
  • ไทยทัศน์ สุดสวนสี Department of Computer and Automation Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology, Kalasin University

Keywords:

Biomass materials, Multi-criteria decision making, Data environment analysis, TOPSIS

Abstract

The decision-making process for selecting the suitable biomass materials from agricultural materials for processing into fuel briquettes is a complex problem, which is difficult to decide because it has several properties/factors to consider simultaneously. In this paper, the TOPSIS, DEA and hybrid DEA-TOPSIS techniques have been proposed for evaluating and ranking the suitable biomass materials from agricultural materials. Firstly, the relevant properties of biomass materials for processing into fuel briquettes were determined. The properties of each biomass material from the agricultural materials were viewed as input and output variables for DEA (as factors for TOPSIS) and the alternatives of the biomass materials from agricultural materials were viewed as decision making units for DEA (as alternatives for TOPSIS). After that, using TOPSIS, DEA and the hybrid DEA-TOPSIS techniques were used to evaluate and rank the biomass materials from agricultural materials. In the case study 1, there are 23 alternatives and 5 relevant criteria, including the moisture content, ash, volatile matters, fixed carbon and heating value. The results of the Spearman correlation coefficient test between the hybrid DEA-TOPSIS technique and DEA and TOPSIS techniques were 0.863 and 0.932, respectively. For the case study 2, there are 7 alternatives and 3 relevant criteria, including the heating value, fixed carbon and moisture content. The results of the Spearman correlation coefficient test between the hybrid DEA-TOPSIS technique and DEA and TOPSIS techniques were same value (Correlation coefficients are equal to 1). For these reasons, the proposed techniques can lead to selecting suitable biomass materials for processing into fuel briquettes by considering several relevant criteria.

References

[1] Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, “Energy Situation in Thailand 2017”, Available: http://www.dede.go.th/ download/ state_61/frontpagejan_nov60.pdf, 26 March 2018. (in Thai)
[2] Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, “Energy Situation in Thailand 2017”, Available:http://www.dede.go.th/download/ state_61/frontpag.pdf, 26 March 2018. (in Thai)
[3] T. Tantisattayakul, S. Phongkasem, P. Phooyar
and P. Taibangury, “Community-based renewable energy from biomass briquettes fuel from coconut leaf”, Thai Science and Technology Journal 23 (3), 2015, pp. 418-431. (in Thai)
[4] Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, “Energy Potential of Biomass in Thailand”, Available: http://www.dede.go.th/ dede/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=130:2010-05-07-08-10-57 & catid = 58&Itemid=68, 26 March 2018. (in Thai)
[5] K. Wongsaroj, T. Sawadsevi, N. Prathinthong and P. Wongsrivej, “Biomass Briquette Production from Jatropha”, KKU Engineering Journal 38 (1), 2011, pp. 65-72. (in Thai)
[6] A. Ussawarujikulchai, C. Semsayun, N. Prapakdee, N. Pieamsuwansiri and N. Chuchat, “Utilization of durian and mangosteen peels as briquette fuel”, Proceedings of 49th Kasetsart University Annual Conference: Science, Bangkok, Thailand, 2011, pp. 162-168.
[7] B. Jolanun, A. Phutharukchat and C. Khamtui, “Community-Based Renewable Energy from Mimosa Pigra L. Charcoal Briquettes”, KKU Research Journal 16 (1), 2011, pp. 20-31. (in Thai)
[8] C. Kahraman, S. C. Onar and B. Oztaysi, “Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review”, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 8 (4), 2015, pp. 637-666.
[9] L.A. Vidal, F. Marle and J.C. Bocquet, “Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects”, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (5), 2011, pp. 5388-5405.
[10] A. Bilbao-Terol, “Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds”, Omega 49, 2014, pp. 1-17.
[11] S. Zhaoxu and H. Min, “Multi-criteria Decision Making Based on PROMETHEE Method”, Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering (CCIE), Wuhan, China, 2010, pp. 416-418.
[12] J. Doyle and R. Green, “Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making”, Omega 21(6), 1993, pp. 713 - 715.
[13] G. Kim, C. S. Park and K. P. Yoon, “Identifying investment opportunities for advanced manufacturing systems with comparative-integrated performance measurement”, International Journal of Production Economics 50(1), 1997, pp. 23-33.
[14] H.S. Shih, H.J. Shyur and E.S. Lee, “An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling 45 (7), 2007, pp. 801-813.
[15] M.J. Farrell, “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120(3), 1957, pp. 253-290.

[16] A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operational Research 2(6), 1978, pp. 429-444.
[17] H., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, “Application of data envelopment analysis approach for optimization of energy use and reduction of greenhouse gas emission in peanut production of Iran”, Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 2018, pp.1327-1335.
[18] T.C. Wang and H.D. Lee, “Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights”, Expert systems with applications 36 (5), 2009, pp. 8980-8985.
[19] A. Beskese, “Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul”, Environmental Earth Sciences 73 (7), 2015, pp. 3513-3521.
[20] H. B. Abbas and J.K. Routray, “Assessing factors affecting flood-induced public health risks in Kassala State of Sudan”, Operations Research for Health Care 3 (4), 2014, pp. 215-225.
[21] J. Khushalani and Y.A. Ozcan, “Are hospitals producing quality care efficiently? An analysis using Dynamic Network Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 60, 2017, pp.15-23.
[22] D. Ennen, and I. Batool, “Airport efficiency in Pakistan - A Data Envelopment Analysis with weight restrictions”, Journal of Air Transport Management 69, 1018, pp.205-212
[23] A. Fazlollahi, and U. Franke, “Measuring the impact of enterprise integration on firm performance using data envelopment analysis”, International Journal of Production Economics 200, 2018, pp.119-129
[24] L. Asandului, M. Roman and P. Fatulescu, “The Efficiency of Healthcare Systems in Europe: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach”, Procedia Economics and Finance (10), 2014, pp. 261-268.
[25] Z. Sinuany-Stern, A. Mehrez and Y. Hadad, “An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units”, International Transactions in Operational Research 7(2), 2000, pp. 109-124.
[26] M.-I. Lin, Y.-D. Lee and T.-N. Ho, “Applying integrated DEA/AHP to evaluate the economic performance of local governments in China”, European Journal of Operational Research 209 (2), 2011, pp. 129-140.
[27] J. Doyle and R. Green, “Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making”, Omega 21(6), 1993, pp. 713-715.
[28] C.K. Hu, F.B. Liu and C.F. Hu, “A Hybrid Fuzzy DEA/AHP Methodology for Ranking Units in a Fuzzy Environment”, Symmetry 9 (11), 2017, pp. 273-282
[29] Y. Fan, “Study on eco-efficiency of industrial parks in China based on data envelopment analysis”, Journal of Environmental Management 192, 2017, pp.107-115.
[30] Wang, C.-N., Nguyen, X.-T., and Wang, Y.-H., Automobile Industry Strategic Alliance Partner Selection: The Application of a Hybrid DEA and Grey Theory Model, Sustainability, 8.2. 173. 2016
[31] F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, “Target setting in the general combined-oriented CCR model using an interactive MOLP method”, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 234 (1), 2010, pp. 1-9.
[32] R.R. Phutteesakul, “The Production of Charcoal Briquette by Coconut Shell and Cassava Rhizome”, Master Thesis, M.Ed. (Industrial Education), Graduate School, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand. 2010.
[33] N. Panunumpa, C. Kuhakan, T. Boonyam, C. Suksi, B. Junjula and P. Ureerak, “Briquette Fuel Production from Agricultural and Oil Palm Waste”,Available: http://forprod.forest.go.th/forprod/PDF, 26 March 2018. (in Thai)
[34] W. Khantirat, N. Wichapa and A. Lawong, “Selecting the Suitable Community-Based Alternative Energy from Biomass Briquettes Fuel from Agricultural Materials Using Analytic Hierarchy”, Proceedings of IE NETWORK 2018, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand, 2018, pp. 323-329.
[35] C. Chunniyom and W. Pattaraprakorn, “Study on the value added of corncob waste to produce the fuel briquettes”, Master Thesis, Graduate School, Thammasat University, Thailand. 2010.
[36] Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research, “Analysis of biomass properties”, Available:http://www.charcoal.snmcenter.com/charcoalthai/hot.php, 18 August 2018. (in Thai)

Published

2019-03-16

Issue

Section

บทความวิชาการ (Academic article)