Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Building under Seismic Forces by Guideline of FEMA 356 and DPT.1303-57

Main Article Content

Suthon Rungruang
Wissawin Arckarapunyathorn

Abstract

The objective of this research is to compare the evaluation of performance damage levels under seismic forces by guideline of FEMA 356 and DPT.1303-57. Five and eight-story reinforced concrete building were structural models by using finite element program. The studied building is a common housing building in Chiang Mai. The structure is a beam-column system and not be designed for earthquake resistance. Both buildings have rectangular shaped building. The height of five and eight-story building are 14.95 and 25.75 meters respectively. The Linear dynamic procedure (LDP) utilized modal response spectrum analysis (RSA) was used this procedure was conducted for 3-Dimensional structure. Fixed support was used. The evaluation results indicated that performance level of both of the buildings is collapse prevention level (CP). The acceptance criteria of performance level for beam based on the guideline of DPT.1303-57 and FEMA 356 are slightly different, but, for a column, the both of guideline are different. The acceptance criteria of performance level for a column based on the guideline of DPT.1303-57, percentage of increasing was 0% - 20.70% for immediate occupancy Level (IO), and percentage of increasing was 0% - 20.40% for life safety level (LS) compared with guideline of FEMA 356. Whereas, the acceptance criteria of performance level for a column on CP level based on the guideline of DPT.1303-57, percentage of decreasing was 0% - 13.33% compared with guideline of FEMA 356.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rungruang, S. ., & Arckarapunyathorn, W. . (2018). Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Building under Seismic Forces by Guideline of FEMA 356 and DPT.1303-57. Frontiers in Engineering Innovation Research, 16(2), 59–69. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jermutt/article/view/241948
Section
Research Articles

References

Ministry of Interior. Notification of Ministry of Interior No.49 (1997) Bearing Capacity, Resistance and Durability of Building to Resist Vibration & Earthquake. Bangkok; 1997. (in Thai)

Ministry of Interior. Notification of Ministry of Interior No.50 (2007) Bearing Capacity, Resistance and Durability of Building to Resist Vibration & Earthquake. Bangkok; 2007. (in Thai)

Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning. Standard for Building Design to Resist Vibration of Earthquake (DPT.1302). Bangkok; 2009. (in Thai)

Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning. Standard for Building Design to Resist Vibration of Earthquake (DPT.1301-54). Bangkok; 2011. (in Thai)

Nutalai P, Chintanapakdee C. Building Damage and Loss Assessment for Bangkok Area due to Earthquake. Proceedings of the 19th National Convention on Civil Engineering. 2014;19:351-358. (in Thai)

Federal emergency management agency (FEMA). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 356). Washington D.C.; 2000.

Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning. Standard for Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Building Structures in the District Vibration of Earthquake (DPT.1303-57). Bangkok; 2014. (in Thai)

Chananan W. Comparative Evaluation of Analysis Procedures for Seismic Evaluation of a Reinforced Concrete Building [master’s thesis]. Department of Civil Engineering: Faculty of Engineering: King Mongkut’t Institute of Technology North Bangkok; 2006. (in Thai)

Arckarapunyathorn W, Wongpiyaboworn S. Seismic Evaluation by Guideline of FEMA 356 and DPT.1303-57: Case Study of a Two-Story Reinforced Concrete Building in Chiang Mai. Proceedings of the 4th Suan Sunandha Academic National Conference on Research for Sustainable Development. 2016;4:55-66. (in Thai)