Enhancing identified circular economic benefits related to the deployment of the Solrød biogas plant
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper investigates how experiences from the deployment of the Solrød biogas plant in Denmark - a large scale centralized biogas plant - can assist future biogas technologies in achieving circular economic benefits. Departing from a theoretical understanding of a circular economy provided by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, the paper analyzes three areas: 1) biogas production, 2) nitrogen, phosphorous & green house gas (GHG) emissions, and 3) re-cycle/cascade materials. It consequently elaborates on the environmental benefits obtained, in terms of CO2 emission from biogas production substituted for fossil fuels, improved water quality and hence reduced GHG emissions due to lower nitrogen effluents, and re-cycling of nutrients on farmland thereby recovering finite resources and improving crop yield. Economic spin-off effects are presented, including new jobs created in the local community. Learning from Solrød Biogas, this paper further proposes to include the following activities when planning for future biogas plants: waste-stream identification and coupling in the local community, measuring the value of digestate as a fertilizer, short distance to farmers delivering manure, and plant design adapted to the local energy market.
Finally, the paper suggests how to qualify the circular economic concept based on the findings from the Solrød biogas plant. It is here concluded, that emphasis should be on cascading energy from biogas production by means of combined heat and power (CHP), district heating or process heat to industry. Besides this, cascades in the manufacturing chain must also be intensified, allowing a more efficient materials and energy utilization and re-cycling in this part of the production chain. This will consequently reduce the total quantity of waste being generated by manufacturing industries, and thus benefit re-cycling strategies that only capture and seek to re-use a limited fraction of the waste being generated from industry.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
European Commission. Communication from the Commission Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussel: European Commission; 2010.
European Commission. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, The council, The European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe, COM (2011) 571 final. Brussels: European Commission; 2011.
European Commission. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, The European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: Towards a circular economy: A zero waste program for Europe, COM (2014) 398 Final/2. Brussels: European Commission; 2014.
European Commission. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, The European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the circular economy. COM (2015) 614 final. Brussels: European Commission; 2015.
European Commission. Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council; Laying down rules on the making available on the market of CE marked fertilizing products and amending regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EC) No 1107/2009. COM (2016) 157 final. Brussels: European Commission; 2016.
Genovese A, Acquaye AA, Figueroa A, Koh L. Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence of some applications. Omega. 2017;66:344-57.
Jelenski LW, Graedel TE, Laudise RA, McCall DW, Patel CKN. Industrial ecology: Concepts and approaches. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 1992;89(3): 793-7.
Lowe EA, Moran SR, Warren JL. Discovering industrial ecology. USA: Battelle Press; 1997.
Erkman S. Industrial ecology: An historical view. J Cleaner Prod. 1997;5(1-2):1-10.
Ayres R, Ayres L. A handbook of industrial ecology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2002.
Lybæk R. Guideline for implementing co-generation based on biomass waste from Thai industries - through implementation and organization of industrial materials networks [PhD dissertation]. Roskilde, Denmark: University of Roskilde; 2004.
McArthur Foundation. Towards the circular economy - Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Cowes, UK: Ellen McArthur Foundation; 2013.
Li Y, Ma C. Circular economy of papermaking in China: A case study. J Cleaner Prod. 2015;92: 65-74.
Zabaniotou A, Rovas D, Libutti A, Monteleone M. Boosting circular economy and closing loop in agriculture: Case study of small-scale pyrolysis-biochar based system integrated in an olive farm in symbiosis with an olive mill. Environ Dev. 2015;14:22-36.
Folkecentret.net [Internet]. Denmark: Nordvestjysk Folkecenter for vedvarende energy [cited 2016 Mar 10]. Available from: http://www.folkecenter.net.
Lybæk R. Development, operation, and future prospects for implementing biogas plants: The case of Denmark. In: Sanz-Bobi MA, editor. Use, operation and maintenance of renewable energy systems. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2014. p. 111-44.
Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresource Technol. 2009;100(22):5478-84.
Jørgensen P. Biogas - Green Energy. 2nd ed. Aarhus, Denmark: Faculty of Agricultural Science, Aarhus University; 2009.
Solrød Biogas [Internet]. Denmark: 2016. What is biogas from Solrød Biogas [cited 2016 Mar 10]. Available from: http://www.solrodbiogas.dk/en.aspx.
Retsinformation.dk [Internet]. Denmark: Order on the use of waste for agricultural purposes (Sludge Order) [cited 2016 Mar 10]. Avaliable from: http://www.eu.dk/samling/20081/kommissionsforslag/kom(2008)0811/bilag/3/657181.pdf. [In Danish].
Bigadan.com [Internet]. Denmark: The Bigadan biogas technology [cited 2016 Mar 10]. Available from http://bigadan.com.
McArthur Foundation. Towards the circular economy - Opportunities for the consumer goods sector. Cowes, UK: Ellen McArthur Foundation; 2013.
Palsberg A, Kjær T. Utilization of the region's untapped straw resources. Research report. Roskilde, Denmark: University of Roskilde; 2015. [In Danish].
Sathre R, Gustavsen L. Energy and carbon balances of wood cascade chains. Resour Conservat Recycl. 2006;47(4):332-55.
Teuber L, Osburg VS, Toporowski W, Millitz H. 2015. Wood polymer composites and their contribution to cascading utilization. J Cleaner Prod. 2015;110: 9-15.
Foglini F, Campiani E, Trincardi F. 2015. The reshaping of the Souht West Adratic Margin by cascading of dense shelf waters. Mar Geol. 2016;375:64-81.
Korhonen J. 2002. A material and energy flow model for co-production of heat and power. J Cleaner Prod. 2002;10(6):537-44.
Sirkin T, ten Houten M. The cascade chain: a theory and tool for achieving resource sustainability with application for product design. Resour Conservat Recycl. 1994;10(3):213-76.
covenantofmayors.eu [Internet]. Belgium: Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy [cited 2016 Mar 10]. Available from: http://www.covenantofmayors.eu/in
dex_en.html.
Kaspersen BS, Christensen TB, Fredenslund AM, Møller HB, Butts MB, Jensen NH, Kjær T. Linking climate change mitigation and coastal eutrophication management through biogas technology: Evidence from new Danish bioenergy concept. Sci Total Environ. 2016;541:1124-31.
EU WFD (Water Framework Directive) [Internet]. Belgium: For an introduction to the directive [cited 2016 Mar 10] Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/ environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html.
Fredenslund AM, Christensen TB, Kjær T, Danielsen S, Møller HB, Kjær LL, et al. Utilization of cast seaweed and waste from pectin production for anaerobic digestion. In: Cossu R, He P, Kjeldsen P, Matsufuji Y, Reinhart D, Stegman R, editors. Proceedings to the Thirteenths International waste management and landfill symposium; 2011 Oct 3-7; Cagliari, Italy. Italy: CISA Publisher; 2011. p. 1-8.
Kjær T. The benefits of Solrød biogas plant. [Presentation]. University of Roskilde, Denmark. 2015.
Holm K. Director of Solrød Biogas Plant. Personal communication. 2016 Apr 7.
Brown S. Single-Site and Industrial scale schemes. Appl Energ. 1996;53:149-55.
Lundsgård E. Plant manager of Solrød Biogas Plant. Personal communication. 2016 Apr 7.
Lybæk R. Strategies for implementing co-generation based on biomass waste from Thai industries [dissertation]. Roskilde, Denmark: Department of Environment, Technology and Social Studies, Roskilde University; 2004.
Lybæk R, Kjær T. Regional Supply of Energy from Small Scale Biogas Plants - Discovering Alternative Heat Markets in Denmark. GMSARN Int J. 2015;9: 1-10.
Energinet.dk. Local use of biogas versus upgrading to the natural gas system. Fredericia: Energinet.dk; 2010.
Kjær T. Associate Professor of Roskilde University. Personal communication. 2016.
Petek J, Glavik P. An integral approach to waste minimization in process industry. Resour Conservat Recycl. 1996;17(3):169-88.