CFD-based stepwise integration and analysis of hull appendages on the resistance performance of a displacement vessel

Main Article Content

Chairat Napasaksri
Chalermkiat Nuchturee
Prin Kanyoo
Sarawuth Srinakaew

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive numerical investigation into the hydrodynamic effects of commonly adopted hull appendages, which are the bulbous bow, skeg, and sonar dome, on a displacement ship operating across a wide Froude number range (Fr = 0.16 to 0.41). Simulations were conducted using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations in combination with the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method to capture free-surface effects. A four-stage stepwise configuration scheme was employed: bare hull, hull with bulbous bow, with bulbous bow and skeg, and finally the fully appended hull including the sonar dome. Results indicate that the bulbous bow contributed the most significant reduction in total resistance, which is up to 8.62% at Fr = 0.26, through wave interference and improved pressure distribution. The skeg aided aft-body flow alignment while the sonar dome showed negligible effect on resistance within typical operating conditions. All appended configurations exhibited increased frictional resistance due to surface area growth, with the full configuration showing an average increase of 6.97%. However, these increases were offset by considerable reductions in pressure resistance, particularly in transitional speeds, with a maximum pressure drag reduction of 29.03% at Fr = 0.24. The novelty of this study lies in its systematic, configuration-based evaluation of multiple appendages under consistent CFD conditions, enabling clear quantification of trade-offs between frictional and pressure resistance. The findings offer practical insights into appendage integration strategies for performance optimization in displacement vessels and guidelines for naval architects in selecting and integrating appendages to optimize resistance characteristics during the early design stages of displacement vessels.

Article Details

How to Cite
Napasaksri, C., Nuchturee, C., Kanyoo, P., & Srinakaew, S. (2026). CFD-based stepwise integration and analysis of hull appendages on the resistance performance of a displacement vessel . Engineering and Applied Science Research, 53(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.64960/easr.2026.262451
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

References

Molland AF, Turnock SR, Hudson DA. Ship resistance and propulsion: practical estimation of ship propulsive power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974113

Carlton JS. Marine propellers and propulsion. 4th ed. UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100366-4.00002-X

Larsson L, Raven HC. Ship resistance and flow. New Jersey: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers; 2010.

Toxopeus S, Sadat-Hosseini H, Visonneau M, Guilmineau E, Yen TG, Lin WM, et al. CFD, potential flow and system-based simulations of fully appended free-running 5415M in calm water and waves. Int Shipbuild Prog. 2018;65(2):227-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/ISP-180147

Di Mascio A, Dubbioso G, Notaro C, Viviani M. Investigation of twin-screw naval ships maneuverability behavior. J Ship Res. 2011;55(4):1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5957/JOSR.55.4.090031

Díaz-Ojeda HR, Pérez-Arribas F, Turnock SR. The influence of dihedral bulbous bows on the resistance of small fishing vessels: A numerical study. Ocean Eng. 2023;281:114661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114661

Lu Y, Chang X, Hu AK. A hydrodynamic optimization design methodology for a ship bulbous bow under multiple operating conditions. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 2016;10(1):330-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2016.1159987

Wu PC, Chen JY, Liu XH, Wu CI, Lu CC. Sonar dome geometry design using CFD to reduce ship resistance at cruise speed. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(14):5342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145342

Pei J, Niu C, Qu J, Liu Y, Shang D. The suppression of hydrodynamic noise from underwater sonar domes by flow control. MATEC Web Conf. 2019;283:08008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928308008

Mandru A, Pacuraru F. The effect of appendages on ship resistance. ModTech International Conference: Modern Technologies in Industrial Engineering IX (ModTech 2021); 2021 Jun 23-26; Eforie Nord, Romania. UK: PURPOSE-LED; 2021. p. 1-9.

Ye T, Guan G, Liang G. Effect of multiple appendages on maritime surveillance ship resistance at various ship speeds. Ocean Eng. 2025;315:119852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119852

Fahrnholz SF, Caprace JD. A machine learning approach to improve sailboat resistance prediction. Ocean Eng. 2022;257:111642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111642

Hirdaris S, Zhang M, Tsoulakos N, Kujala P. A ship digital twin for safe and sustainable ship operations. In: Karakostas B, Katsoulakos T, editors. State-of-the-Art Digital Twin Applications for Shipping Sector Decarbonization. Hershey: IGI Global; 2024. p.192-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9848-4.ch009

Çelik C, Danişman DB, Khan S, Kaklis P. A reduced order data-driven method for resistance prediction and shape optimization of hull vane. Ocean Eng. 2021;235:109406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109406

White PF, Piro DJ, Knight BG, Maki KJ. A hybrid numerical framework for simulation of ships maneuvering in waves. J Ship Res. 2022;66(2):159-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5957/JOSR.06200037

Wang X, Zou Z, Fan T, Xia L, Liu W. Design and optimization of rudder bulb based on CFD and genetic algorithm. Ocean Eng. 2022;265:112601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112601

Çelik F. A numerical study for effectiveness of a wake equalizing duct. Ocean Eng. 2007;34(16):2138-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.04.006

Liu Z, Zhao W, Wan D. Resistance and wake distortion optimization of JBC considering ship-propeller interaction. Ocean Eng. 2022;244:110376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110376

Hu J, Wan Q, Li X, Zhang W, Ning X, Duan C. Propeller-rudder interaction under different rudder angle. Ocean Eng. 2024;306:118104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118104

Sharma R, Sha OP. Hydrodynamic design of integrated bulbous bow/sonar dome for naval ships. Def Sci J. 2005;55(1):21-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.55.1958

Shao Y, Chen Y, Zhu Z, Wu W. Hydrodynamic acoustic assessment on the sonar dome of ships. J Ship Mech. 2014;18(11):1386-96.

Hu J, Zhang Y, Wang P, Qin F. Numerical and experimental study on resistance of asymmetric catamaran with different layouts. Brodogradnja. 2020;71(2):91-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21278/brod71206

Korkut E. A case study for the effect of a flow improvement device (a partial wake equalizing duct) on ship powering characteristics. Ocean Eng. 2006;33(2):205-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.03.010

Yao R, Yu L, Fan Q, Wang X. Experimental and numerical resistance analysis for a cruise ship W/O fin stabilizers. J Mar Sci Eng. 2022;10(8):1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10081054

Sumarsono S, Cahyono B, Erwandi E, Baidowi A, Ali B. An experimental investigation into the effect of bilge keel position on landing craft utility vessels. Naše More. 2023;70(4):189-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17818/NM/2023/4.1

Villa D, Franceschi A, Viviani M. Numerical analysis of the rudder–propeller interaction. J Mar Sci Eng. 2020;8(12):990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8120990

Morales FAP, Serfaty R, Vedovotto JM, Cavallini A, Villar MM, Silveira-Neto AD. Fluid–structure interaction with a finite element–immersed boundary approach for compressible flows. Ocean Eng. 2023;290:115755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115755

Troll M, Shi W, Stark C, Atlar M. Vortex dynamics impact on the wake flow of a marine rudder with leading-edge tubercles. J Mar Sci Eng Technol. 2022;8:553-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-022-00262-x

Yang Y, Zhang Z, Zhao J, Zhang B, Zhang L, Hu Q, et al. Research on ship resistance prediction using machine learning with different samples. J Mar Sci Eng. 2024;12(4):556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12040556

Liang L, Zhao P, Zhang S, Ji M, Song J, Yuan J. Simulation and experimental study on control strategy of zero-speed fin stabilizer. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0204446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204446

Chen Q, Liu Z, Liu W, Zhao G. Design and principles analysis of hydrofoil appendages for reducing resistance of high-speed ships. J Mar Sci Eng. 2024;12(8):1394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081394

Song K, Gong J, Ma J, Xu Q, Shi Y, Xu F. Numerical study on the influence of interceptor and stern flap on ship resistance and motion response in regular waves. J Mar Sci Eng. 2024;12(6):929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12060929

Campana EF, Peri D, Tahara Y, Stern F. Shape optimization in ship hydrodynamics using computational fluid dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2006;196(1-3):634-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.06.003

Torckler R, Majidiyan H, Enshaei H. CFD-based design of novel drag-reducing appendages for container ships. Appl Ocean Res. 2025;158:104605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2025.104605

Menter FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 1994;32(8):1598-605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149

Wu PC, Chen JY, Wu CI, Lin JT. CFD investigation for sonar dome with bulbous bow effect. J Mar Sci Eng. 2023;11(2):58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions8020058

Tun TH, Htun YT. The experimental and numerical study of the appendage drag influence on resistance of ship. KMI Int J Marit Aff Fish. 2017;9(2):031-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54007/ijmaf.2017.9.2.31

Zhang S, Wu Q, Liu J, Li S, Yasukawa H. Impact of bulbous bow shapes on hydrodynamic derivatives due to hybrid drifting and circular motion tests. Ocean Eng. 2023;289:116182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116182

Majumdar S, Rajani BN, Kulkarni DS, Subrahmanya MB. Numerical simulation of incompressible turbulent flow using linear eddy viscosity-based turbulence models. Def Sci J. 2010;60(6):614-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.60.603