Evaluation of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and Thailand’s Department of Highways’ approaches to estimating the capacity of a multilane highway segment via the empirical method

Main Article Content

Punyaanek Srisurin
Chisanu Amprayn

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the methods used by the Thailand Department of Highways (DOH) and the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010 and HCM 2016) for estimating the capacity of an urban multilane highway segment in Thailand, by comparing these estimates with the empirical capacity derived from a speed-flow plot. Field data were collected from a six-lane urban highway segment in Thailand, followed by documentation of the roadway conditions and analysis of vehicle composition. Capacity estimates were calculated using the DOH and HCM methods prior to comparing them to the empirically measured capacity. The results showed that the empirical capacity was 1,619 pc/h/ln. The capacities estimated using the HCM 2010 and HCM 2016 methods were 34.8% and 35.3% greater than the empirically measured capacity, respectively, while the capacity estimated using the DOH method was 14.1% lower than the measured capacity. These findings indicate significant discrepancies in the estimates produced by the three models, when applied to the multilane highways segment. Given that the DOH model has not been updated in over two decades, this study concludes that its accuracy in capacity estimation may be compromised by evolving factors, such as driver behavior, traffic flow characteristics, vehicle types, and vehicle performance. Moreover, the DOH method's omission of variables (including access point density, median type, and terrain type) may further affect its accuracy. Similarly, since HCM 2010 and HCM 2016 are tailored to the United States, using both models to estimate the capacity of the multilane highway segment of interest may lead to errors due to differences in driver behaviors between Thai and American drivers, distinct traffic flow characteristics, the model’s omission of the percentage of motorcycles, and the overestimation of speed at capacity on the highway segment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Srisurin, P., & Amprayn, C. (2024). Evaluation of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and Thailand’s Department of Highways’ approaches to estimating the capacity of a multilane highway segment via the empirical method. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 51(6), 747–755. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/easr/article/view/257425
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

References

Asgharzadeh M, Kondyli A. Comparison of highway capacity estimation methods. Transp Res Rec. 2018;2672(15):75-84.

Modi V, Kondyli A, Washburn SS, McLeod DS. Freeway capacity estimation method for planning applications. J Transp Eng. 2014;140(9):05014004.

Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual: A guide for multimodal mobility analysis. 5th ed. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2010.

Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual: A guide for multimodal mobility analysis. 6th ed. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2016.

Prapongsena P, Kraisingson S, Pansiri K. Traffic congestion index and density analysis report in 2013. Thailand: Bureau of Highway Safety, Department of Highways; 2014. (In Thai)

Hamad K, Abuhamda H. Estimating base saturation flow rate for selected signalized intersections in Doha, Qatar. J Traffic Logist Eng. 2015;3(2):168-71.

Akçelik R. An assessment of the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 roundabout capacity model. TRB International Roundabout Conference; 2011 May 17-20; Carmel, USA.

Elefteriadou L, Kondyli A, Washburn S, Brilon W, Lohoff J, Jacobson L, et al. Proactive ramp management under the threat of freeway-flow breakdown. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;16:4-14.

Geistefeldt J. Empirical relation between stochastic capacities and capacities obtained from the speed-flow diagram. Transp Res Circular. 2011;(E-C149):147-56.

Alsharari A, Asgharzadeh M, Kondyli A. Estimation of the effect of rain and incidents on freeway capacity and free-flow speed. Transp Res Rec. 2020;2674(8):536-44.

Sysoev A, Anikienko T, Blyumin S. Highway capacity estimation: International regulation and neurostructural remodeling approach. Period Polytech Transp Eng. 2020;48(2):180-8.

Brilon W, Geistefeldt J, Regler M. Reliability of freeway traffic flow: a stochastic concept of capacity. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory; 2005 Jul 19-21; College Park, Maryland.

Kondyli A, Elefteriadou L, Brilon W, Hall FL, Persaud B, Washburn S. Development and evaluation of methods for constructing breakdown probability models. J Transp Eng. 2013;139(9):931-40.

Mehar A, Chandra S, Velmurugan S. Highway capacity through vissim calibrated for mixed traffic conditions. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2014;18:639-45.

Srisurin P. Microscopic simulation model for mixed traffic of connected automated vehicles and conventional vehicles on freeways [dissertation]. Lawrence (KS): University of Kansas; 2020.

Minderhoud MM, Botma H, Bovy PH. Assessment of roadway capacity estimation methods. Transpn Res Rec. 1997;1572(1):59-67.

Jayaratne DND, Pasindu HR. Empirical study on capacity evaluation of urban multi-lane roads under heterogeneous traffic conditions. Transp Res Proc. 2020;48:3595-606.

Bie J, Lo HK, Wong SC. Capacity evaluation of multi‐lane traffic roundabout. J Adv Transp. 2010;44(4):245-55.

Adnan MA, Sulaiman N, Tuan Besar TBH. Comparative evaluation of US HCM & Malaysian HCM for a multilane highway. Int J Res Innov Soc Sci. 2023;7(11):134-51.

Roh CG. Analysis of effects of heavy vehicles on urban freeway capacity: highway capacity manual estimations vs. observations in Seoul, Korea. Int J Adv Eng Manag Res. 2016;1(4):490-6.

Jain MP, Mane A, Arkatkar SS, Joshi GJ. Capacity estimation on two lane hilly roads under heterogeneous traffic condition in India. Transp Res Proc. 2020;48:3197-210.

Ringkananont, W, Siridhara S. Highway capacity assessment based on relationship between space mean speed and flow: a case study of Thanarat Road, Pak Chong, Nakhon Ratchasima. SWU Eng J. 2012;7(2):1-14. (In Thai)

Kim J, Elefteriadou L. Estimation of capacity of two-lane two-way highways using simulation model. J Transp Eng. 2010;136(1):61-6.

Tanwanichkul L, Pitaksringkarn J, Thongkrew P. The study of highway cross-section design criteria from traffic volume perspective using traffic micro-simulation. KKU Eng J. 2012;39(3):241-8.

Chaipanha W, Pitaksringkarn J, Tanwanichkul L. Use of the traffic micro-simulation model to estimate the capacity of rural 4-lane highway (raised median). KKU Res J (Graduate Studies). 2018;18(2):1-5. (In Thai)

Ghosh T, Roy SK, Gangopadhyay S. Capacity estimation of multilane highways under heterogeneous traffic conditions using micro-simulation technique. SAMRIDDHI. 2020;12(1):20-5.

Chaipanha W, Kaewwichian P. Development of equations to estimate the capacity of two-lane rural highways in Thailand by measuring the maximum capacity using the traffic model. J Sci Technol MSU. 2021;40(1):73-81. (In Thai)

Prapongsena P, Kraisingson S, Pansiri K. Traffic congestion index and density analysis report in 2011. Thailand: Bureau of Highway Safety, Department of Highways; 2012. (In Thai)

Roess RP, Prassas ES, McShane WR. Traffic engineering. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2011.

PlotDigitizer. PlotDigitizer: Version 3.1.5; 2024 [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 6]. Available from: https://plotdigitizer.com/app.

Aydin O, Yassikaya MY. Validity and reliability analysis of the PlotDigitizer software program for data extraction from single-case graphs. Perspect Behav Sci. 2022;45(1):239-57.

Ye L, Yamamoto T. Modeling connected and autonomous vehicles in heterogeneous traffic flow. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl. 2018;490:269-77.

Srisurin P, Kondyli A. Integrating car following and lane changing in a mixed traffic model of connected automated vehicles and conventional vehicles. Transportation Research Board 100th Annual Meeting; 2021 Jan 5-29; Washington, USA.

Liu P, Fan W. Exploring the impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on freeway capacity using a revised intelligent driver model. Transp Plan Technol. 2020;43(3):279-92.

Lewis A, Azoulay R, David E. Machine learning for predicting traffic and determining road capacity. The 16th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence; 2024 Feb 24-26; Rome, Italy. p. 1162-9.

Huo J, Wu X, Lyu C, Zhang W, Liu Z. Quantify the road link performance and capacity using deep learning models. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2022;23(10):18581-91.

Departemen Pekerjaan Umum. Indonesian highway capacity manual. Indonesia: Ministry of Public Work; 1993. Report no.: 09/T/BNKT/ 1993.

Srisurin P, Chalermpong S. Analyzing human, roadway, vehicular and environmental factors contributing to fatal road traffic crashes in Thailand. Eng J. 2021;25(10):27-38.

Bassani M, Catani L, Cirillo C, Mutani G. Night-time and daytime operating speed distribution in urban arterials. Transp Res F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 2016;42:56-69.