An efficient claim management assurance utilizing monarch butterfly optimization approach based EPC model

Main Article Content

Mukilan K
Rameshbabu C
Velumani P


The Engineering Procurement Construction (EPC) contract frameworks have been broadly used to play out various developments works by the private sector. The aim of the study is to reduce the claim issues such as time and cost and increase the profizility and productivity one of the popular and important construction models is EPC that incorporates work among construction, procurement, and engineering in the single contract. Engineering Procurement Construction (EPC) utilizes the project's structure of contract systems. Based on large-scale infrastructure projects, the EPC contract models are utilized with a private zone to execute the construction work. This study proposes the methodology is Monarch Butterfly Optimization (MBO) algorithm-based claim management system via the EPC mechanism. The time and cost are the major objective functions to be solved in this paper. The construction techniques and design substitutes in which it satisfies the minimum requirements of the Engineer. Thereafter, the final decision is made with the project manager views the document via cost and time. The experimental analysis for the EPC approach is reviewed in terms of utilizing the risk level classification. By using the MBO algorithm to minimizes the cost and time for the EPC construction process. The claim management problems are effectively analyzed in the result section.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
K, M., C, R., & P, V. (2021). An efficient claim management assurance utilizing monarch butterfly optimization approach based EPC model. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 48(5), 570-580. Retrieved from


[1] Tavakolan M, Nikoukar S. Developing an optimization financing cost-scheduling trade-off model in construction project. Int J Construct Manag. 2019:1-16.

[2] Yang JB, Huang KM, Lee CH, Chiu CT. Incorporating lost productivity calculation into delay analysis for construction projects. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2014;18(2):380-8.

[3] Białas A. Cost-benefits aspects in risk management. Pol J Manag Stud. 2016;14(1):28-39.

[4] Merritt GM, Smith GP. Techniques for managing project risk. Field Guide Proj Manag. 2004;2:202-18.

[5] Prayogo D, Cheng MY, Wong FT, Tjandra D, Tran DH. Optimization model for construction project resource leveling using a novel modified symbiotic organisms search. Asian J Civ Eng. 2018;9(5):625-38.

[6] Leśniak A, Juszczyk M. Prediction of site overhead costs with the use of artificial neural network based model. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2018;18:973-82.

[7] Czajkowska A, Kadłubek M. Management of factors affecting quality of processes in construction enterprises. Pol J Manag Stud. 2015;11(1):28-38.

[8] Toan NQ, Tam NV, Hai DT, Quy NLD. Critical factors affecting labor productivity within construction project implementation: a project manager’s perspective. Enterpren Sustain. 2020;8(2):751-63.

[9] Ko CH, Liao HS. Reducing ineligible contractor disputes in government procurement: a lesson from Taiwan. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2014;18(2):409-18.

[10] Tochaiwat K, Chovichien V. Contractor’s construction claims and claim management process. Eng J Res Dev. 2004;15(4):66-76.

[11] Androniceanu A. Social responsibility, an essential strategic option for a sustainable development in the field of bio-economy. Amfiteatru Econ. 2019;21(52):503-19.

[12] Bozgulova N, Parmanova R, Abenova M, Ivanyuk T, Aryshev V. Calculation methods for cost management in the construction industry. Enterpren Sustain. 2019;7(2):1450-61.

[13] Khekale C, Futane N. Management of claims and disputes in construction industry. Int J Sci Res. 2015;4(5):848-56.

[14] Nurdiana A, Susanti R. Assessing risk on the engineering procurement construction (EPC) project from the perspective of the owner: a case study. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science; 2019 Oct 1-2; Surabaya, Indonesia. Bristol: IOP Publishing; 2020. p. 1-6.

[15] Waziri BS, Bala K, Bustani SA. Artificial neural networks in construction engineering and management. Int J Architect Eng Construct. 2017;16(1):50-60.

[16] Androniceanu A. The social sustainability of smart cities: urban technological innovation, big data management, and the cognitive internet of things. Geopolitics Hist Int Relat. 2019;11(1):110-5.

[17] Hasnain M, Thaheem MJ, Ullah F. Best value contractor selection in road construction projects: ANP-based decision support system. Int J Civ Eng. 2018;16(6):695-714.

[18] Koo C, Hong T, Kim S. An integrated multi-objective optimization model for solving the construction time-cost trade-off problem. J Civ Eng Manag. 2015;21(3):323-33.

[19] Rooholelm V, Aboumasoudi AS. Designing pattern for project delay analysis with several periods extension of time, continuous and discrete (Pr-to-Pr). Comput Ind Eng. 2020;146(10):106576.

[20] Park SH, Kim YS. An assessment of contract management capabilities for overseas construction projects. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2018;22(7):2148-58.

[21] Mohamed HH, Ibrahim AH, Soliman AA. Reducing construction disputes through effective claims management. Am J Civ Eng Architect. 2014;2(6):186-96.

[22] Lv X, Wang Y, Deng J, Zhang G, Zhang L. Improved particle swarm optimization algorithm based on last-eliminated principle and enhanced information sharing. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018;2018(14):1-17.

[23] Yao L. Research on collaborative design of traffic network and landscape construction on urban residential area. 2017 2nd International Conference on Education, Sports, Arts and Management Engineering (ICESAME 2017); 2017 Apr 29-30; Zhengzhou, China. Paris: Atlantis Press; 2017. p. 843-6.

[24] Bao S, Ebadi A, Toughani M, Dalle J, Maseleno A, Yıldızbasi A, et al. A new method for optimal parameters identification of a PEMFC using an improved version of monarch butterfly optimization algorithm. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2020;45(35):17882-92.

[25] Mukilan K, BalaNivetha M, Velumani P, Christopher GS. A qualitative study and analysis of causes and disputes in claims in construction industry. Int J Civ Eng Tech. 2019;10:951-7.

[26] Yoo WS, Yang J, Kang S, Lee S. Development of a computerized risk management system for international NPP EPC projects. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2017;21(1):11-26.

[27] Islam MS, Nepal MP, Skitmore M. Modified fuzzy group decision-making approach to cost overrun risk assessment of power plant projects. J Construct Eng Manag. 2019;145(2):04018126.

[28] Seo W, Kang Y. Performance indicators for the claim management process of construction projects. In: Cho YK, Leite F, Behzadan A, Wang C, editors. ASCE International conference on computing in civil engineering 2019; 2019 Jun 19; Atlanta, USA. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE); 2019. p. 611-7.

[29] Islam MS, Trigunarsyah B, Hassanain M, Assaf SA. Causes of delay in construction projects in Bangladesh. The 6th international conference on construction engineering and project management; 2015 Oct 11-14; Busan, Korea. Busan: Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management; 2015. p. 82-6.

[30] Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN'95-international conference on neural networks; 1995 Nov 27- Dec 1; Perth, Australia. New York: IEEE; 1995. p. 1942-8.

[31] Ansal V. ALO-optimized artificial neural network-controlled dynamic voltage restorer for compensation of voltage issues in distribution system. Soft Comput. 2020; 24(2):1171-84.

[32] Dorigo M, Stutzle T. Ant colony optimization: overview and recent advances. In: Gendreau M, Potvin JY, editors. Handbook of metaheuristics. 3rd ed. Boston: Springer; 2019. p. 311-51.

[33] Metawa N, Hassan MK, Elhoseny M. Genetic algorithm based model for optimizing bank lending decisions. Expert Syst Appl. 2017;80:75-82.